Abstract
Romanian political leaders and diplomats have always relied heavily on historical arguments to justify their aims in foreign policy. The emphasis on historic rights and continuous residence has caused the most controversy in the question of the possession of Transylvania, but it has also been a major element in each stage of the national movement. Because of the close link between past and present in Romanian national ideology and the importance of the historical heritage, it can be understood why historians have played such a major role in politics and diplomacy. Men such as Nicolae Bălcescu, Nicolae Iorga and Mihail Kogălniceanu not only wrote about their nation’s past, but they helped shape the course of its development. The importance of the historical element in the national idea and the presence of notable historians in the political leadership explains why Romanian leaders have placed such an emphasis on historic rights even when justifying their claims to areas, such as Transylvania, where the majority of the population is Romanian.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For Kogălniceanu’s life and career see: N. Ciachir and C. Bu§e, Mihail Kogălniceanu (Bucharest, 1967);
R. Dragnea, Mihail Kogălniceanu (Bucharest, 1926);
D. Hîncu, Kogălniceanu (Bucharest, 1960);
A. Oţetea, ‘Un créateur de la Roumanie moderne: Mihail Kogălniceanu’, Revue roumaine d’histoire, vol VII, no. 1 (1968) pp. 3–15;
Al. Zub, Mihail Kogălniceanu: Istoric (Iaşi, 1974) and Mihail Kogălniceanu; un fondateur de la Roumanie moderne (Bucharest, 1978). See also
Al. Zub, Mihail Kogălniceanu: Biobibliografie (Bucharest, 1971).
The eastern crisis of 1875–8 from the Romanian standpoint is discussed in N. Ciachir, Războiul pentru independenşa României în contextul european, 1875–1878 (Bucharest, 1977) and
N. Corivan, Lupta diplomatică pentru cucerirea independenţei României (Bucharest, 1977). See also
B. Jelavich, Russia and the Formation of the Romanian National State, 1821–1878 (Cambridge, 1983) pp. 215–91.
Kogălniceanu to Savfet Pasha, Bucharest, 25 June/6 July 1876, in G. Macovescu, Mihail Kogălniceanu: documente diplomatice (Bucharest, 1972) pp. 120–3.
On Russo-Romanian relations and the problem of Bessarabia see B. Jelavich, ‘Russia and the Reacquisition of Southern Bessarabia, 1875–1878’, Südost-Forschungen, vol. XXVIII (1969) pp. 199–237.
D. A. Sturdza, Charles Ier: Roi de Roumanie: Chronique-Actes-Documents (Bucharest, 1904) vol. II, pp. 536–41.
See Kogălniceanu’s statement to a secret session of the assembly and senate in February 1878. G. Penelea (ed.), Mihail Kogălniceanu: Opere (Bucharest, 1978) vol. IV, no. 4, pp. 526–9.
C. C. Giurescu, Ion C. Brătianu: Acte şi Cuvântări (Bucharest, 1930), vol. III, p. 167.
Kogălniceanu to Ghica, Bucharest, 24 January/5 February 1878, in General R. Rosetti, Corespondenţa Generalului Iancu Ghica, 2 aprilie 1877–8 aprilie 1878 (Bucharest, 1930) pp. 136–7.
Kogălniceanu to Ghica, Bucharest, 15/27 January 1878, in Vasile M. Kogălniceanu, Acte şi documente din corespondenţa diplomatică a lui Mihail Kogălniceanu (Bucharest, 1893) vol. I, p. 24.
See B. Jelavich, ‘Romania at the Congress of Berlin: Problems of Peacemaking’, in Ralph Melville and Hans-Jürgen Schröder (eds), Der Berliner Kongress von 1878 (Wiesbaden, 1982) pp. 189–204.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jelavich, B. (1988). Mihail Kogălniceanu: Historian as Foreign Minister, 1876–8. In: Deletant, D., Hanak, H. (eds) Historians as Nation-Builders. Studies in Russia and East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09647-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09647-3_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09649-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09647-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)