Advertisement

Political Parties and Electoral Politics

  • John J. Bailey

Abstract

Mexican authorities after 1983 repeatedly invoked bipartidismo, roughly two-party competition, as an undesirable, exotic notion promoted largely by the United States and other hostile forces to eliminate the left and undermine national sovereignty. The historical record — not only in Mexico but in other countries of the region as well — shows that the United States sees no inconsistency in both favouring democratisation and using out-parties to pressure governments. Throughout the Mexican Revolution the United States played one faction off against another, now granting or now withholding recognition, in order to advance its interests. Although this vivid memory coincides nicely with the PRI-government’s project of maintaining hegemonic power, realism suggests that the United States would work through a major opposition party in Mexico. This should be kept in mind when we consider the PRI’s special efforts to prop up the partisan left as a political counterweight to the PAN and the threat from the right.

Keywords

Political Party Federal District Voter Turnout Political Reform Local Election 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 2.
    Baer, D. and Bailey, J. ‘Mexico’s 1985 Midterm Elections: A Preliminary Assessment’, LASA Forum (Fall 1985), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Krauze, E. ‘Por una democracia sin adjetivos’, Vuelta, 85 (January 1985), 4–13;Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meyer, L.‘La democracia como proyecto’, Excélsior, 21 November 1985, p. 74Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Paz, O. ‘Hora cumplida, 1929–1985’, Vuelta, 9: 103 (June 1985) 7–12.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Loaeza, S. ‘El llamado de las urnas: para que sirven las elecciones en México?’ Nexos, 90 (June 1985) 13–19.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Padgett, V. (1976) The Mexican Political System, 2nd edn (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin) p. 115.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Craig, A.L. and Cornelius, W.A. ‘Political Culture in Mexico: Continuities and Revisionist Interpretations’, in Almond, G.A. and Verba, S. (eds) (1980) The Civic Culture Revisited: An Analytic Study (Boston: Little, Brown) p. 367.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Booth, J. and Seligson, M. ‘The Political Culture of Authoritarianism in Mexico: A Reexamination’, Latin American Research Review, 19: 1 (1984), 106–24.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    J. Molinar H., ‘La costumbre electoral mexicana’, Nexos, 85 (Jan. 1985) 19–21.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Segovia, R. ‘Las elecciones federales de 1979’, Foro Internacional, 20:3 (January–May 1980), p. 408, mentions re-districting in Puebla and Culiacán designed to dilute the PAN’s strength in the urban vote by adding rural constituencies.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Arreola, A. ‘1981: elecciones en el Estado de México’, Estudios políticos (nueva epoca), 1:1 (October–December 1982), 25–32;Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Vernon, R. (1965) The Dilemma of Mexico’s Development: The Roles of the Private and Public Sectors (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press) p. 135.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    C. Domínguez M., ‘Quién es quién en la izquierda mexicana’, Nexos, 54 (June 1982), 28–32;Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    C. Dominguez M., Razones, 58 (22 March- 4 April, 1982), 30–33;Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Segovia, R. ‘Las elecciones federales de 1979’; Excélsior, 15 April 1985, 10F.Google Scholar
  16. 30.
    Garza Ramírez, E. (coord.) (1985) Nuevo León 1985 (Monterrey: Nacional Monumel) p. 140.Google Scholar
  17. 35.
    Loaeza, S. ‘Bursting the Bubble: Mexico’s Electoral Process and PAN’s Image Were Overblown’, The Arizona Republic, 28 July 1985, p. C2.Google Scholar
  18. 41.
    See P. Fernandez Christlieb, ‘Elecciones federales 1985: los partidos de izquierda ante la “unidad”’, Rev. mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, 31–120 (April–June 1985), 13–48, for a more complete analysis of the left.Google Scholar
  19. 48.
    Riding, A. (1985) Distant Neighbors: A Portrait of the Mexicans (New York: Alfred A. Knopf) pp. 79–82.Google Scholar
  20. 50.
    J.G. Castañeda, ‘Elecciones: tres ideas sin saña’, Proceso, 451, 24 June 1985, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John J Bailey 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • John J. Bailey
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgetown UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations