Skip to main content

The Land of Israel: Sanctified Matter or Mythic Space?

  • Chapter
Book cover Three Faiths — One God

Part of the book series: Library of Philosophy and Religion ((LPR))

  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

The central issue to be faced as we confront the doctrine of the Land in Jewish tradition is that we have been led to believe that as an historical religion Judaism manifests a marked preference for sacred time over sacred space. Having been nurtured by A. J. Heschel’s lyrical prose that declares unequivocally, ‘Judaism is a religion of time aiming at the sanctification of time … to the Bible it is holiness in time, the Sabbath, which comes first … The sanctity of the time came first, the sanctity of man came second, and the sanctity of space last. Time was hallowed by God; space, the Tabernacle, was consecrated by Moses’,1 we are astonished by the realisation that space occupies a far more prominent place in our theology than we were, heretofore, prone to admit. One must wonder aloud as to whether Heschel himself conceded this point by devoting one of his last books, Israel: An Echo of Eternity, to the Land. Beyond this concern with holy territory, we, children of modernity, are offended and alienated by the ‘scandal of particularity’ that emanates from the twin concepts of Jewish peoplehood and nationhood. Finally, our Christian brethren have, over the years, viewed the land-centred-ness of ‘Israel of the flesh’ with some considerable scepticism, especially when juxtaposed with the immaterial sanctity of ‘Israel of the spirit’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Consider, for example, the doctrine of shelilat hagolah (negation of the exile) that has been a consistent theme in Zionist thought.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Vital, The Origins of Zionism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975) p.1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James Sanders, Torah and Canon (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1972) pp. 25–48. Sanders’s observation is most interesting in light of the land-law dichotomy posited in the main body of the chapter. Perhaps the Torah is itself the best evidence of the inherent correctness of the RaMBaM-Hartman approach; the narrative description of the Kibbush is separated from the Torah and its laws.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacob Neusner, ‘Sympesium and the Territorial Dimension of Judaism’, Midstream (March 1983), pp. 38–9,

    Google Scholar 

  5. and ‘Map Without Territory: Mishna’s System of Sacrifice and Sanctuary’, History of Religions 19 (1979) pp. 103–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ‘Map Without Territory’.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ‘Map Without Territory’.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Avot d’Rabbi Natan, ch. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tanhuma, Vayera 1, Buber edn, p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. T. Megillah 16b.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Neusner, ‘Map Without Territory’, p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maggid Devarar l’Yaakov (Koretz) p. 9b quoted in G. Scholem, ‘Neutralization of Messianism in Early Hasidism’, The Messianic Idea in Judaism, and other essays on Jewish Spirituality (New York: Schocken, 1971), p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Degel Machaneh Ephraim (Jerusalem), pp. 135–6. A full discussion of this beautiful passage is to be found in Art Green, ‘Sabbath as Temple: Some Thoughts on Space and Time in Judaism’, in Go and Study: Essays Presented to Alfred Jospe, (edited by Raphael Jospe and Samuel C. Fishman (Washington, DC: B’nai B’rith Hillel Foundations, c. 1980) pp. 301–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nachmanides, Commentary to Genesis 1:1, Charles Chavel, (trans.), pp. 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nachmanides, Commentary to Genesis 1:1, pp. 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Commentary to Psalms, Mikraot Gedulot.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a full discussion of all the issues pertaining to Nachmanides see Uriel Simon, ‘Religion, Morality and Politics’, in Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kedushat Levi (Warsaw) p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Although I argued above that Nachmanides’s relationship to the Land is that of the mythic-messianist, his mythically mystical inclinations cannot override the moral-ethical considerations of the law. He is, after all, thoroughly committed to Talmudic law and ethics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Chaim Seidler-Feller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seidler-Feller, C. (1989). The Land of Israel: Sanctified Matter or Mythic Space?. In: Hick, J., Meltzer, E.S. (eds) Three Faiths — One God. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09434-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics