Abstract
In our view, the balance of power is a means to an end in international politics, not an end in itself. It is the means by which a state can prevent another from dominating world politics. At the same time, a balance of power creates a situation which allows a state to ensure its own safety and to promote its own interests and objectives. This system imposes limits on the degree and the range of objectives which a state can pursue, and this is true even if a state does not self-consciously pursue a balance of some sort. A balance of power is inherently self-limiting. It prevents hegemony by any single Power, and operates within the context of political pluralism.
Fortunately as regards other states, we [in the United States] are an island power, and can find our best precedents in the history of the people to whom the sea has been a nursing mother.
A. T. Mahan
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Carsten Holbraad, The Concert of Europe: A Study in German and British International Theory 1815–1914 (London, 1970), p. 7.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 John B. Hattendorf and Robert S. Jordan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hattendorf, J.B., Jordan, R.S. (1989). Conclusions Maritime Strategy and National Policy: Historical Accident or Purposeful Planning?. In: Hattendorf, J.B., Jordan, R.S. (eds) Maritime Strategy and the Balance of Power. St Antony's. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09392-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09392-2_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09394-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09392-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)