Skip to main content

Lenin’s Plan for the Reorganization of Rabkrin (1922–3)

  • Chapter
State Control in Soviet Russia

Part of the book series: Studies in Russian and East European History and Society ((SREEHS))

  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

The stabilisation of NEP in 1922 allowed for a more considered examination of policy. Socially isolated, the regime constituted, in M. Lewin’s phrase, ‘a dictatorship in the void’, its survival guaranteed only by the power of the party-state administration.1 The effectiveness of that apparatus became a major preoccupation of an insecure leadership. In the final months of his active life Lenin initiated a major reappraisal of the regime’s policies. A cornerstone of this legacy was his celebrated and ambitious plan to reorganize Rabkrin, an attempt fundamentally to rethink the organization of the proletarian dictatorship and to develop mechanisms to combat the tendencies towards authoritarianism and bureaucratic degeneration already manifest in the Soviet one-party state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. M. Lewin, Lenin’s Last Struggle (London, 1973) ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Deutscher, The Prophet Unarmed (Oxford, 1970) pp. 35–7; 48–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Davydov, A.D. Tsyurupa (M., 1961) pp. 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stalin took with him some control workers from NKRKI to the Secretariat including L.Z. Mekhlis. See Who Was Who in the USSR (Metuchen, N.J., 1972) p. 378.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.N. Ikonnikov, Sozdanie i deyatel’nost’ ob”edinennykh organov TsKK-RKI v 1923–1934 gg. (M., 1971) p. 54;

    Google Scholar 

  6. N.A. Voskresenskaya, V.I. Lenin — organizator sotsialisticheskogo kontrolya (M., 1970) p. 232–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.D. Trotsky. The Real Situation in Russia (London, n.d.) pp. 304–5, Trotsky, My Life (New York, 1970), pp. 478–9. Deutscher, The Prophet Unarmed, pp. 48–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. On the origin and history of TsKK, see: I.M. Moskalenko, TsKK v bor’be za edinstvo i chistotu partinnykh ryadov (M., 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. English see P.M. Cocks, Politics of Party Control: The Historical and Institutional Role of Party Control Organs in the CPSU, unpublished Ph.D. thesis (Harvard University, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See also M. Neuveld, ‘The Origin of the Communist Control Commission’, The American Slavic and East European Review, vol. xviii, no. 3 (October 1959), pp. 315–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. PSS, vol. 45, p. 389. For Lenin’s earlier clashes with Proletkult on the question of the ‘cultural revolution’, see C. Claudin-Urondo, Lenin and the Cultural Revolution (Brighton, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L.D. Trotsky, The Challenge of the Left Opposition 1923–1925 (New York, 1975) pp. 61–2. Trotsky, The Real Situation in Russia, pp. 301–2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trotsky, The Stalin School of Falsification (New York, 1972) pp. 72–3; 75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.V. Daniels, The Conscience of the Revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1960) pp. 190–1; 473–4. Other historians mistakenly argue that it was Lenin’s second article ‘Better fewer, but better’, which the Politburo tried to suppress. Deutscher, The Prophet Unarmed, p. 88, Lewin, Lenin’s Last Struggle, p. 120; Carr, Interregnum, p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.D. Trotsky, Zadachi XII s”ezda RKP(b) (M., 1923) pp. 26–36; 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See S. Lovell (ed.), Leon Trotsky Speaks (New York, 1972) pp. 155–8; 166.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E.F. Rozmirovich, V chem sushchnost’ reformy Rabkrina (M., 1923) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ikonnikov, Sozdanie i deyatel’nost’, p. 62 cites the unpublished thesis by F.I. Potashev, Obsuzhdenie predlozhenii V.I. Lenina ob ob”edinenii TsKK i RKI v period podgotovki i na XII s”ezde partii-Tezisy dokladov k nauchnoi konferentsii Rostovskoi vysshei partiinoi shkoly Oktyabr’ 1965 g, 1965, p. 51. See also Dvenadtsatyi s”ezd RKP(b), p. 886.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G.V. Kuibysheva et al., V.V. Kuibyshev (M., 1966) pp. 194–5; this commission included V.V. Kuibyshev, E.M. Yaroslavskii and N.M. Shvernik.

    Google Scholar 

  20. V.V. Kuibyshev, Zadachi TsKK i RKI (M., 1925) pp. 46–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 E.A. Rees

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rees, E.A. (1987). Lenin’s Plan for the Reorganization of Rabkrin (1922–3). In: State Control in Soviet Russia. Studies in Russian and East European History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09299-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics