Skip to main content

Dying with Dignity: A United States View

  • Chapter
Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care
  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

Most Americans want to make decisions about their terminal care, and discussions between patients, families and physicians about death and terminal illness are much more open than they were 10 years ago. Discussions of ethical dilemmas about life-sustaining treatment and about terminal care are frequent in medical journals and in the lay press. Most hospitals have medical staff policies about ‘do not resuscitate’ orders, and many hospitals have established ethics committees to facilitate discussions and decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bedell, S. E., Pelle, D., Maher, P. L. and Cleary, P. (1986) Do not resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 256, 233–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniels, N. (1986) Why saying no to patients in the United States is so hard. New Engl. J. Med., 314, 1380–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraser, I. (1985) Medicare reimbursement for hospice care: ethical and policy implications of cost-containment strategies. J. Health Politics, Policy and Law, 10, 565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonsen, A. R. (1983) A concord in medical ethics. Ann. Intern. Med., 99, 261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kane, R. L., Wales, J., Bernstein, L., Leibowitz, A. and Kaplan, S. (1984) A randomized controlled trial of hospice care. Lancet, i, 890–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kane, R. L., Bernstein, L., Wales, J. and Rothenberg, R. (1985) Hospice effectiveness in controlling pain. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 253, 2683–2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapp, M. and Lo, B. Legal perceptions and medical decision making. Milbank Memorial Quarterly, in press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lo, B., Saika, G., Strull, W., Thomas, E. and Showstack, J. (1985) Do not resuscitate decisions: a prospective study at three teaching hospitals. Arch. Intern. Med., 145, 1115–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lo, B., McLeod, G. and Saika, G. (1986) Patient attitudes towards discussing life-sustaining treatment. Arch. Intern. Med., 146, 1613–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983) Deciding to Forego Life-sustaining Treatment, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scitovsky, A. A. and Capron, A. M. (1986) Medical care at the end of life: The interaction of economics and ethics. Ann. Rev. Public Health, 7, 59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Society for the Right to Die, New York (1987) Handbook of Living Will Laws (1987 edition), Handbook of Living Will Laws: 1981–1984; Fact Sheets on Major Right to Die Decisions 1976–1987

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wanzer, S. H., Adelstein, S. J., Cranford, R. E. et al. (1984) The physician’s responsibility towards hopelessly ill patients. New Engl. J. Med., 310, 955–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 The Editor and the Contributors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lo, B., Rouse, F. (1988). Dying with Dignity: A United States View. In: Stoll, B.A. (eds) Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09296-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09296-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09298-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09296-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics