Skip to main content

Did High-Powered Money Rule the Roost? Monetary Policy, Private Behaviour and the Structure of Interest Rates in the United Kingdom: 1972–77

  • Chapter
The Operation and Regulation of Financial Markets

Part of the book series: Studies in Monetary Economics ((STUDMOECO))

Abstract

Asset Price Expectation Formation (APEX) equations are derived by inverting theoretically plausible asset demand functions under the maintained assumptions of continuous market clearing and unbiased expectations. In this paper, I argue that APEX equations can be used in empirical research aimed at circumventing the Lucas critique. The results of this work suggest that the mean-variance model with rational expectations can explain a significant proportion of the movement in UK asset returns during 1972–7. The results also suggest that the authorities’ avowed strategy of pegging short-term interest rates was correctly perceived by private agents and incorporated into their estimate of the covariance matrix of asset returns. A by-product of this study is that descriptive models of the variance of a time series do not necessarily contain any information about the risks and welfare losses actually incurred by agents facing this data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bank of England (1982) ‘The role of the Bank of England in the money market’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, March, pp. 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. R. and Savin, N. E. (1977) ‘Conflict among criteria for testing hypotheses in the multivariate linear regression model’, Econometrica, 45: 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley, R. A. (1983) ‘Tests of restrictions in large demand systems’, European Economic Review, 20: 257–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, W. C. (1964) ‘Financial intermediaries and a theory of monetary control’, Yale Economic Essays 4(1). Reprinted as Chapter 4 in Hester, D. D. and Tobin, J. (eds) (1967) Financial Markets and Economic Activity (London: Wiley, pp. 91–141).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, B., Rieder, B. and Tintner, G. (1980) ‘A system of demand equations for Austria’, Empirical Economics, 5: 129–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. (1983) ‘Estimates of the variance of US inflation based upon the ARCH model’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 15: 286–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. A. (1982) ‘In search of the exchange risk premium: a six-currency test assuming mean-variance optimization’, Journal of International Money and Finance, 1: 255–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. A. (1984) ‘Portfolio shares as ‘beta-breakers’: a test of CAPM’, Journal of Portfolio Management, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. A. and Dickens, W. T. (1984) ‘Are asset demand functions mean-variance efficient?’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 1113 (revised).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B. M. (1977) ‘Financial flow variables and the short-run determination of long-term interest rates’, Journal of Political Economy, 85: 661–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. J. (1982) ‘Monetary policy and the structure of interest rates in the United Kingdom: a flow of funds model 1971–77’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. J. (1984a) ‘Preliminary results from a five-sector flow of funds model of the United Kingdom 1972–77’, Economic Modelling, 1: 304–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. J. (1984b) ‘Interest parity: a time series approach’, Manchester University Department of Economics, Discussion Paper, No. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. J. (1985) ‘Asset demands and asset prices in the UK: there is a risk premium’, Paper presented at The Money Study Group Conference, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. J. and Keating, G. B. (1985) ‘Capital asset pricing under alternative policy regimes’, London Business School, Discussion Paper, 157 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, G. B. (1986) ‘The financial sector of the LBS model’, in Currie, D. (ed.) Advances in Monetary Economics (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1976) ‘Econometric policy evaluation: a critique’, Journal of Monetary Economics (supplement) 5: 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehans, J. (1978) The Theory of Money (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, M. J. (1970) ‘Discount house portfolio and debt selection’, Review of Economic Studies, 37: 469–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964) ‘Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk’, Journal of Finance, 19: 425–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1969) ‘A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1: 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. and Brainard, W. C. (1968) ‘Pitfalls in financial model building’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 57: 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

I thank Juliette Thomas for excellent secretarial assistance.

Copyright information

© 1987 The Money Study Group

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Green, C.J. (1987). Did High-Powered Money Rule the Roost? Monetary Policy, Private Behaviour and the Structure of Interest Rates in the United Kingdom: 1972–77. In: Goodhart, C., Currie, D., Llewellyn, D.T. (eds) The Operation and Regulation of Financial Markets. Studies in Monetary Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09287-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics