Skip to main content
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

Northanger Abbey is the most text-dominated of Austen’s novels. As a parody of the Gothic and sentimental novels popular in Austen’s day it traces the education of Catherine Morland, a young girl enmeshed in her favourite fictions, these same novels of Gothic horror and sentiment. Catherine must not only escape her reliance on popular fiction; she must also escape her reliance on language as an absolute. At the beginning of the novel, Catherine is a literal reader, both of her favourite novels and of the words of the other characters she encounters. She is entrapped by the fictions which other characters choose to tell about her as well as by those they tell about themselves. In a sense, Catherine’s education in Northanger Abbey consists of learning to be a good reader, to recognize that it is dangerous to expect language or its fictional constructs to offer a one-to-one correspondence with real life. Northanger Abbey is structured like a Chinese box of fictions within fictions within fictions; Catherine’s education consists of breaking through each layer of fabrication into a closer approximation of ‘reality’.1 The beginning of the novel features the parodic description of Catherine’s qualifications as a heroine and establishes her as an anti-heroine. The end of the novel is equally self-conscious. Austen collapses the fictional design by calling attention to her own role as author and creator and to Catherine’s role as character and creation. But between these two points, Catherine learns to be a good eighteenth century empiricist, judging actions instead of words. Her judgment of Henry Tilney provides the one significant exception — as we later shall see.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cf. Katrin Ristok Burlin: ‘Every character in this novel is implicated in the fictive process. Its heroine is a novel-reader, its hero an inveterate inventor of fictions, its villains liars, contrivers of fiction. The complicated plot is based totally on fictions, each of its major crises being precipitated by a fiction.’, ‘ “The Pen of the Contriver”: The Four Fictions of Northanger Abbey’ in Bicentennary Essays, ed. John Halperin (Cambridge University Press, 1975) p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  2. As D. D. Devlin in Jane Austen and Education (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1975) p. 42, notes, Catherine is nonetheless lucky to be the only one of Austen’s heroines to have two loving and essentially responsible parents.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kenneth L. Moler in his Jane Austen’s Art of Allusion (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1968) p. 36

    Google Scholar 

  4. and Barbara Hardy in her A Reading of Jane Austen (New York University Press, 1979) p. 88, both conclude that Catherine is fooled partly because ‘she judges the world by her own standards of honesty and fidelity’.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See C. S. Lewis in ‘A Note on Jane Austen’, in Jane Austen, ed. Ian Watt (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963) pp. 26–7, on the essential innocence of Catherine’s errors.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stuart Tave, Some Words of Jane Austen (University of Chicago Press, 1973) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anne Ehrenpries (ed.), Northanger Abbey (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972) p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See B. C. Southam, ‘“Regulated Hatred” Revisited’ in Jane Austen: Northanger Abbey and Persuasion, ed. B. C. Southam (London: The Macmillan Press, 1976) pp. 125–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mary Lascelles, Jane Austen and Her Art (Oxford University Press, 1939) p. 39

    Google Scholar 

  10. observes that in Regina Marie Roche’s Clermont (1798), the heroine learns of her father’s guilt ‘by observing him look pointedly at a picture of Cain killing Abel’. In such a world, expression is fact.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Juliet McMaster in her Jane Austen on Love, English Literary Studies, ed. Samuel Macey (University of Victoria, 1978) pp. 47–8, notes that Henry shares some characteristics with Henry Higgens.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Such critics include Andrew Wright, Jane Austen’s Novels (London: Chatto & Windus, 1954), p. 102

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marvin Mudrick, Jane Austen (Princeton University Press, 1952) pp. 49–51, who states that Henry seems almost wholly immune from criticism by the narrator; and

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Walton Litz, Jane Austen (London: Chatto & Windus, 1965), p. 69, who speaks of Henry as Austen’s ‘spokesman’.

    Google Scholar 

  15. But see also Alastair Duckworth for a discussion of some of Henry’s limitations in The Improvement of the Estate (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971) pp. 95–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Karl Kroeber, who notes, in criticism of Henry, that Austen’s more impressive heroes are not talkers. ‘Subverting a Hypocrite Lecteur’ in Jane Austen Today, ed. Joel Weinsheimer (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1975), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Laura G. Mooneyham

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mooneyham, L.G. (1988). Northanger Abbey: an Escape from Fiction?. In: Romance, Language and Education in Jane Austen’s Novels. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09242-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics