Abstract
Northanger Abbey is the most text-dominated of Austen’s novels. As a parody of the Gothic and sentimental novels popular in Austen’s day it traces the education of Catherine Morland, a young girl enmeshed in her favourite fictions, these same novels of Gothic horror and sentiment. Catherine must not only escape her reliance on popular fiction; she must also escape her reliance on language as an absolute. At the beginning of the novel, Catherine is a literal reader, both of her favourite novels and of the words of the other characters she encounters. She is entrapped by the fictions which other characters choose to tell about her as well as by those they tell about themselves. In a sense, Catherine’s education in Northanger Abbey consists of learning to be a good reader, to recognize that it is dangerous to expect language or its fictional constructs to offer a one-to-one correspondence with real life. Northanger Abbey is structured like a Chinese box of fictions within fictions within fictions; Catherine’s education consists of breaking through each layer of fabrication into a closer approximation of ‘reality’.1 The beginning of the novel features the parodic description of Catherine’s qualifications as a heroine and establishes her as an anti-heroine. The end of the novel is equally self-conscious. Austen collapses the fictional design by calling attention to her own role as author and creator and to Catherine’s role as character and creation. But between these two points, Catherine learns to be a good eighteenth century empiricist, judging actions instead of words. Her judgment of Henry Tilney provides the one significant exception — as we later shall see.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cf. Katrin Ristok Burlin: ‘Every character in this novel is implicated in the fictive process. Its heroine is a novel-reader, its hero an inveterate inventor of fictions, its villains liars, contrivers of fiction. The complicated plot is based totally on fictions, each of its major crises being precipitated by a fiction.’, ‘ “The Pen of the Contriver”: The Four Fictions of Northanger Abbey’ in Bicentennary Essays, ed. John Halperin (Cambridge University Press, 1975) p. 89.
As D. D. Devlin in Jane Austen and Education (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1975) p. 42, notes, Catherine is nonetheless lucky to be the only one of Austen’s heroines to have two loving and essentially responsible parents.
Kenneth L. Moler in his Jane Austen’s Art of Allusion (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1968) p. 36
and Barbara Hardy in her A Reading of Jane Austen (New York University Press, 1979) p. 88, both conclude that Catherine is fooled partly because ‘she judges the world by her own standards of honesty and fidelity’.
See C. S. Lewis in ‘A Note on Jane Austen’, in Jane Austen, ed. Ian Watt (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963) pp. 26–7, on the essential innocence of Catherine’s errors.
Stuart Tave, Some Words of Jane Austen (University of Chicago Press, 1973) p. 41.
Anne Ehrenpries (ed.), Northanger Abbey (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972) p. 251.
See B. C. Southam, ‘“Regulated Hatred” Revisited’ in Jane Austen: Northanger Abbey and Persuasion, ed. B. C. Southam (London: The Macmillan Press, 1976) pp. 125–6.
Mary Lascelles, Jane Austen and Her Art (Oxford University Press, 1939) p. 39
observes that in Regina Marie Roche’s Clermont (1798), the heroine learns of her father’s guilt ‘by observing him look pointedly at a picture of Cain killing Abel’. In such a world, expression is fact.
Juliet McMaster in her Jane Austen on Love, English Literary Studies, ed. Samuel Macey (University of Victoria, 1978) pp. 47–8, notes that Henry shares some characteristics with Henry Higgens.
Such critics include Andrew Wright, Jane Austen’s Novels (London: Chatto & Windus, 1954), p. 102
Marvin Mudrick, Jane Austen (Princeton University Press, 1952) pp. 49–51, who states that Henry seems almost wholly immune from criticism by the narrator; and
A. Walton Litz, Jane Austen (London: Chatto & Windus, 1965), p. 69, who speaks of Henry as Austen’s ‘spokesman’.
But see also Alastair Duckworth for a discussion of some of Henry’s limitations in The Improvement of the Estate (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971) pp. 95–8.
See Karl Kroeber, who notes, in criticism of Henry, that Austen’s more impressive heroes are not talkers. ‘Subverting a Hypocrite Lecteur’ in Jane Austen Today, ed. Joel Weinsheimer (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1975), p. 39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Laura G. Mooneyham
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mooneyham, L.G. (1988). Northanger Abbey: an Escape from Fiction?. In: Romance, Language and Education in Jane Austen’s Novels. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09242-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09242-0_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09244-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09242-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)