Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Contemporary Interpretations of Shakespeare ((CIS))

Abstract

Two assumptions are apt to be made about Elizabethan revenge plays: first, that all of them, except for Hamlet, are unproblematic in structure to the point of naïveté; and, second, that all of them, including Hamlet, are concerned centrally with the ethical dilemma of revenge. Both assumptions are incorrect, and the source of endless misleading critical labour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. T. S. Eliot, ‘Hamlet’, in Selected Essays (London, 1932) p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fredson Bowers, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy (Princeton, NJ, 1940) p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See J. Huizinga, The Waning of the Middle Ages (1924; Harmondsworth, Middx, 1955);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Willard Farnham, The Medieval Heritage of Elizabethan Tragedy (Oxford, 1956);

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Peter, Complaint and Satire in Early English Literature (Oxford, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, L. B. Campbell, ‘Theories of Revenge in Renaissance England’, in Modern Philology, XXVIII (1931), and

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes: Slaves of Passion (Cambridge, 1930);

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. T. Bowers, ‘The Audience and the Revenger of Elizabethan Tragedy’, Studies in Philology, XXXI (1934), and Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roy Walker, The Time is out of joint (London, 1948);

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. R. Elliott, Scourge and Minister (Durham, NC, 1951);

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Vyvyan, The Shakespearean Ethic (London, 1959);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Irving Ribner, Patterns in Shakespearean Tragedy (New York, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helen Gardner, The Business of Criticism (Oxford, 1959);

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eleanor Prosser, Hamlet and Revenge (Stanford, Calif. 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. M. Frye, The Renaissance Hamlet (Princeton, NJ, 1984) ch. 2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. G. K. Hunter, Dramatic Identities and Cultural Tradition (Liverpool, 1978) p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Peter Mercer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mercer, P. (1987). Introduction. In: Hamlet and the Acting of Revenge. Contemporary Interpretations of Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09217-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics