Advertisement

Role of Selected Lobules of the Cerebellum in the Control of Locomotion

  • Masao Udo
Part of the Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series book series (WGS)

Abstract

It is remarkable that classical studies on the cerebellum which were based solely on the “destruction” gross-lesion approach yielded such meaningful and still appropriate answers to the question “what does the cerebellum do”? For example, from observation of locomotor disturbances arising from cerebellar lesions, Flourens (1824) concluded that an animal with a damaged cerebellum could still initiate and execute a movement, but only in a clumsy manner. He concluded that this clumsiness arose from difficulties in coordinating the contraction of numerous muscles and the movements of various bodily parts. Similarly, Holmes classical (1922a,b) description of cerebellar “signs” in human patients has remained essentially unmodified and, indeed, his work is difficult to extend upon, despite much substantial effort and much technical progress in the field of clinical neurophysiology (for review: Brooks and Thach, 1982).

Keywords

Purkinje Cell Stance Phase Complex Spike Locomotor Control Cerebellar Lobule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, G. and Oscarsson, O. (1978). Climbing fibre miorozones in cerebellar vermis and their projection to differenc groups of cells in the lateral vestibular nucleus. Exp. Brain Res. 32:565–579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks, V.B. and Thach, T. (1982). Cerebellar control of pustur.e and movement. In Handbook of’Physiology, Section I, Vol. II, The Nervous System. Motor Control, Part2. (ed. V.B. Brooks). Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, pp. 877–946.Google Scholar
  3. Dow, R.S. and Morüzzi, G. (1958). The Physiology and Pathology of the Cerebellum. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  4. Ekerot, C-F. and Larson, B. (1980). Termination in overlapping sagittal zones in cerebellar anterior lobe of mossy and climbing fibre paths activated from dorsal funiculus. Exp. Brain Res: 38:163–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliott, R.M.J, and Jordan, L.M. (1985), Initiation of locomotion from the mesencephalic locomotor region: Effects of selective brain stem lesions. Brain Res. 328:121–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Flourens, P. (1824). Recherches experimentales sur les proprietes et les fonctions du systeme nerveux dans les animaux vertebres. Edition 1, Crevot, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Holmes, G., (1922a,b). The clinical symptoms of cerebellar disease and their interpretation. Lancet I: 1177–1182, 1231–1237 and II: 59–65, 111–115.Google Scholar
  8. Hongo, T., Jankowska, E. and Lundberg, A. (1969). The rubrospinal tract. I. Effects on alpha-motoneurones innervating hindlimb in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 7:344–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ito, M. (1984). The Cerebellum and Neural Control. Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Matsukawa, K., Kamei, H., Mínoda, K. and Udo, M. (1982). Interlimb coordination in cat locomotion investigated with perturbation. I. Behavioral and electromyographic study on symmetric limbs of decerebrate and awake walking cats. Exp. Brain Res. 46:425–437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsukawa, K. and Udo, M. (1985). Responses of cerebellar Purkinje cells to mechanical perturbations during locomotion of decerebrate cats. Neurosci. Res. 2, in press.Google Scholar
  12. Mori, S., Kawahara, K., Sakamoto, T., Aoki, M. and Tomiyama, T. (1982). Setting and resetting of level of postural muscle tone in decerebrate cata by stimulation of brain stem. J. Neurophysiol. 48:737–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Orlovsky, G.N., Severin, F.V. and Shik, M.L. (1966). Effect of damage to the cerebellum on the coordination of movement in the dog on running. Biophysics 11:578–588.Google Scholar
  14. Toyama, K., Tsukahara, N. and Udo, M. (1968). Nature of the cerebellar influences upon the red nucleus neurones. Exp. Brain Res. 4:292–309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Udo, M., Oda, Y., Tanaka, K. and Horikawa, J. (1976). Cerebellar control of locomotion investigated in cats: Discharges from Deiters neurones, EMG and limb movements during local cooling of the cerebellar cortex. In Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 44. (ed. S. Homma). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 445–459.Google Scholar
  16. Udo, M., Matsukawa, K. and Kamei, H. (1979). Effects of cooling of cerebellar cortex at lobules’ V and IV of the intermediate part in the decerebrate walking cats under monitoring vertical floor reaction forces. Brain Res. 160:559–564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Udo, M., Matsukawa, K, Kamei, H. and Oda, Y. (1980). Cerebellar control of locomotion: Effects of cooling cerebellar intermediate cortex in high decerebrate and awake walking cats. J. Neurophysiol. 44:119–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Udo, M., Matsuk’awa, K., Kamei, H., Minoda, K. and Oda, Y. (1981). Simple and complex spike activities of Purkinje cells during locomotion in the cerebellar vermal zones of decerebrate cats. Exp. Brain Res. 41:292–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Udo, M., Kamei, H., Matsukawa, K. and Tanaka, K. (1982). Interlimb coordination in cat locomotion investigated with perturbation. II. Correlates in neuronal activity of Deiters’ cells of decerebrate walking cats. Exp. Brain Res. 46:438–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yu, J. and Eidelberg, E. (1981). Effects of vestibulospinal lesions upon locomotor function in cats. Brain Res. 220 :179–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Wenner-Gren Center 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masao Udo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations