Skip to main content
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

During the nineteenth century a number of authorities pointed out the drawbacks of mortality data; one outcome of this was that at the beginning of the present century attempts were made to collect cancer morbidity data. This was initially done by carrying out a census of patients with the disease; estimates of the prevalence of cancer were obtained for Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and Hungary in the first few years of the century. Such a method of data collection was open to considerable error, owing to the difficulty of obtaining the co-operation of all the doctors involved (Dollinger, 1907). Registration of patients treated with radium began in Great Britain in 1928, by the National Radium Commission. Between the two world wars regional cancer registries were set up in various countries; these provided morbidity data of value. In 1942, despite enemy occupation, Denmark became the first country to establish a national registry (Clemmesen, 1965). The other Scandinavian countries soon followed, with registries based on lines practically identical with those of the Danish one. With the inception of the National Health Service, the national cancer registry scheme was launched in England and Wales. It was not until 1962 that all the regions of the country were covered by the scheme (Registrar General, 1968). A scheme for registration was introduced in Scotland in 1958.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

4.4 Bibliography 4.4.1 Incidence not Covered by IARC

4.4.2 International Survival Statistics

  • Bailar et al. (1966) mounted a special study to identify possible reasons for the difference in survival between England and Wales and the US for cervical cancer. Detailed examination was made of records for a regional register in each of the countries: no bias in method of preparing incidence and survival data was identified which could account for the persistent differences in the results.

    Google Scholar 

  • Data for various countries have been published as follows (the years indicate the period of recording incidence involved in the material): 8 countries for 30 sites Logan (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgium 1964–5: National Confederation of Christian Sickness Funds (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Finland 1953–74: Hakulinen et al. (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain 1960–74: Cancer Research Campaign (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norway 1953–67: Norwegian Cancer Society (1975) 1968–75: Cancer Registry of Norway (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • United States 1940–64: Axtell et al. (1972) 1950–69: Axtell et al. (1976) 1960–73: Myers and Hankey (1980) 1977–82: (Hodgkin’s disease): Davis et al. (1987)

    Google Scholar 

4.4.3 Clustering

  • Bailar et al. (1970), Barton et al. (1965), Ederer et al. (1964), Gunz and Speirs (1968), Klauber (1971), Knox (1963, 1964), Mantel (1967), Ohno et al. (1979), Pearson (1913), Pike and Smith (1968), Smith (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt’s lymphoma East Africa: Williams et al. (1978)

    Google Scholar 

4.4.4 Prediction

  • Hakama et al. (1986); Hakulinen and Pukkala (1982); Sandstad (1982); Boyle and Robertson (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Michael Alderson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alderson, M. (1988). Cancer Registration. In: Mortality, Morbidity and Health Statistics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09068-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09068-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09070-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09068-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics