The Economists, the Corn Laws and Commercial Policy

  • Leonard Gomes

Abstract

The repeal of the English Corn Laws on 26 June 1846 was an epoch-making event in the history of international economic policy. The decision was significant, perhaps more because of its symbolic value than for any dramatic impact on international economic relationships.

Keywords

Sugar Corn Depression Europe Income 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Thweatt, op. cit. p. 208.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    William D. Grampp, ‘Economic Opinion when Britain turned to Free Trade’, History of Political Economy, vol. 14, no. 4 (1982) p. 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sir James Graham, M.P., Corn and Currency: in an Address to the Landowners (London: Ridgway, 1826) p. 21.Google Scholar
  4. The attitude of one of these landowners, Lord Sheffield: ‘I know nothing of Ricardo, nor of Hume, nor of any of the other writers, nor of their works’ was fairly typical. Remark quoted in Boyd Hilton, Corn, Cash and Commerce: The Economic Policies of the Tory Governments, 1815–1830 (Oxford: Oxford U.P., 1977) p. 9.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    G. J. Stigler, ‘Do Economists Matter?’ Southern Economic Journal, vol. 42, no. 3 (Jan 1976) pp. 347–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    Asa Briggs, The Age of Improvement (London: Longmans, 1959) p. 201.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Gertrude Himmelfarb, The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age (London: Faber & Faber, 1984) p. 101.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Cobbett’s Political Register, issues for November and December 1807.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    See Mill’s review of Spence’s pamphlet in Eclectic Review 3 (Dec 1807) p. 1056 and Commerce Defended in D. Winch (ed.) James Mill: Selected Economic Writings (Edinburgh, 1966) pp. 23–35.Google Scholar
  10. See J. S. Chipman, ‘Balance of Payments Theory’, in J. Creedy and D. P. O’Brien (eds) Economic Analysis in Historical Perspective (London: Butterworths, 1984) pp. 209–10.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Torrens, The Economists Refuted, pp. 15–26, 30–1, 50–1.Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    Spiegel, op. cit. p. 199.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Leonard Horner (ed.) Memoirs and Correspondence of Francis Horner, M.P. 2 vols. (London, 1843) vol. II, p. 227.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Malthus, Essay on Population, 5th ed. pp. 408–9.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Ibid. pp. 426–7.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Malthus, Essay on Population, 2nd ed., p. 166.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Idem. 3rd ed. (1806) vol. II, p. 237.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    The full title of Ricardo’s pamphlet is An Essay on the Influence of a low Price of Corn on the Profits of Stock; shewing the Inexpediency of Restrictions on Importations: with Remarks on Mr Malthus’s two last PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    Hollander’s interpretation is contained in his The Economics of David Ricardo, op. cit. pp. 599–642, and ‘Ricardo and the Corn Laws: A Revision’, History of Political Economy, vol. 9, no. 1 (Spring 1977) pp. 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. For the traditional view that Ricardo’s profit theory originated in concern over the Corn Laws see Blaug, Ricardian Economics: A Historical Study (New Haven, Conn.: Yale U.P. 1958) pp. 31–2;Google Scholar
  21. Maurice Dobb, Theories of Production and Distribution Since Adam Smith (Cambridg U.P., 1973) pp. 89–90;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. D. P. O’Brien, J. R. McCulloch: A Study in Classical Economics (London, 1970) p. 296.Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    Ricardo, Works, vol. VI, p. 104.Google Scholar
  24. 19.
    R. L. Meek, ‘The Decline of Ricardian Economics in England’, Economica, vol. 17 (1950) p. 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. See Anthony Arblaster, The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984) p. 249.Google Scholar
  26. 20.
    Edwin Cannan, History of the Theories of Production and Distribution in English Political Economy from 1776 to 1848, 3rd ed. (London: Staples Press, 1953) p. 391.Google Scholar
  27. 21.
    Ricardo, Works, vol. IV, p. 26 n.Google Scholar
  28. 22.
    Ibid. vol. VI, p. 109.Google Scholar
  29. 23.
    Ibid. vol. IV, p. 179.Google Scholar
  30. 24.
    Ibid. vol. IV, p. 41.Google Scholar
  31. 25.
    ‘Mr Owen’s Plans for Relieving the National Distress’, Edinburgh Review, 32 (Oct 1819) p. 459. All articles in the Edinburgh were unsigned, but the work has been attributed to Torrens although McCulloch is sometimes mentioned as being the author.Google Scholar
  32. 26.
    Torrens, Essay on the Production of Wealth (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme & Brown, 1821) pp. 252–60.Google Scholar
  33. 27.
    Ibid. p. 119.Google Scholar
  34. 28.
    Torrens, Essay Upon the External Corn Trade, p. 257.Google Scholar
  35. 29.
    Ibid. p. 256.Google Scholar
  36. 30.
    Ibid. p. 235, 331–2.Google Scholar
  37. 31.
    Torrens, Tracts on Trade and Finance, no. II (London, 1852) pp. 48–9.Google Scholar
  38. 32.
    Eclectic Review, n.s. 2 (July 1814) pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  39. 33.
    Andrea Maneschi, ‘Dynamic Aspects of Ricardo’s International Trade Theory’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 35, no. 1 (Mar 1983) p. 79.Google Scholar
  40. See also the article by Vivian Walsh, ‘Ricardian Foreign Trade Theory in the Light of the Classical Revival’, Eastern Economic Journal, vol. 5, no. 3 (Oct 1979) pp. 421–7Google Scholar
  41. 34.
    Ricardo, Works, vol. I, p. 132.Google Scholar
  42. 35.
    Hollander, Economics of Ricardo, op. cit. p. 604.Google Scholar
  43. 36.
    D. P. O’Brien, ‘Ricardian Economics and the Economics of David Ricardo’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 33, no. 3 (Nov 1981) p. 376.Google Scholar
  44. 37.
    Blaug, Ricardian Economics, op. cit. pp. 31–2. Joan Robinson said: ‘He used it as a horror story.’ Robinson, op. cit. vol. V, p. 141.Google Scholar
  45. 38.
    For a critique of Berg’s interpretation see the review of her book by Gregory Claeys and Prue Kerr, ‘Mechanical Political Economy’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 5 (1981) pp. 251–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 39.
    O’Brien, ‘Ricardian Economics …’ (1981) op. cit. p. 381.Google Scholar
  47. 40.
    Ibid. p. 251.Google Scholar
  48. 41.
    Blaug, Ricardian Economics, op. cit. p. 211.Google Scholar
  49. 42.
    Ricardo, Works, vol. V, pp. 187–8.Google Scholar
  50. 43.
    Ibid. vol. IV, p. 243. See also idem, Ricardo to McCulloch (Mar 1821) vol. VIII, pp. 355–60.Google Scholar
  51. 44.
    William D. Grampp, ‘Economic Opinion and Free Trade’, op. cit. p. 510.Google Scholar
  52. 45.
    Ricardo, Works, vol. VIII, p. 208.Google Scholar
  53. 46.
    Ibid. vol. I, p. 343.Google Scholar
  54. 47.
    Ibid. p. 340.Google Scholar
  55. 48.
    See the interesting paper by William Grampp, ‘Scots, Jews, and Subversives among the Dismal Scientists’, Journal of Economic History vol. 36, no. 3 (Sep 1976) pp. 543–71, on the lampooning of the classical economists at the hands of popular, xenophobic writers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 49.
    Ricardo, Works, vol. I, p. 94.Google Scholar
  57. 50.
    J. M. Letiche, ‘Adam Smith and David Ricardo on Economic Growth’, in Bert F. Hoselitz, J. J. Spengler et al., Theories of Economic Growth (Glenco, Ill.: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1960) p. 80.Google Scholar
  58. 51.
    Ricardo, Works, vol. I, pp. 137–8.Google Scholar
  59. 52.
    J. S. Mill commented on the issue in two articles for the Westminster Review — ‘The Corn Laws’, Apr 1825 and ‘The New Corn Law’, January 1827 reprinted in Collected Works, op. cit.Google Scholar
  60. 53.
    Mill, Collected Works, op. cit. vol. IV, p. 47.Google Scholar
  61. 54.
    Ibid. p. 64.Google Scholar
  62. 55.
    Ibid. p. 143. For an excellent account of the arguments used in the parliamentary debates on the Corn Laws during 1824–30 see Barry Gordon, Economic Doctrine and Tory Liberalism 1824–30 (London, Macmillan: 1979) pp. 52–66.Google Scholar
  63. 56.
    Melvyn Krauss, The New Protectionism (New York, 1979) p. XXIII, also p. 6.Google Scholar
  64. 57.
    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) 1: col. 673 (30 May 1820).Google Scholar
  65. 58.
    See the reference in Grampp, ‘Scots, Jews, and Subversives’, op. cit. p. 565.Google Scholar
  66. 59.
    Annual Register, 1820 (London, 1822) vol. I, p. 70.Google Scholar
  67. 60.
    For a revealing discussion of the analytical issues and personalities involved in the Australian case for protection see the exchanges between Paul A. Samuelson and Gary J. Manger in Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 96, no. 1 (Feb 1981) pp. 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 61.
    Torrens, Tracts on Finance and Trade, vol II (London: Chapman & Hall, 1852) p. 32.Google Scholar
  69. 62.
    Malthus, Essay on Population, 5th ed. ii, pp. 409–10.Google Scholar
  70. 63.
    Ibid. pp. 403–4.Google Scholar
  71. 64.
    Ricardo to Malthus, 16 Sep 1814, Works, vol. VI, p. 134, andGoogle Scholar
  72. Works, vol. VIII, p. 22.Google Scholar
  73. 65.
    J. C. L. Simonde de Sismondi, Nouveau Principes d’Economie politique (1819) (Paris: Caiman-Levy, 1971 pp. 265–6.Google Scholar
  74. 66.
    Jean-Baptiste Say, Letter to Mr Malthus on Several Subjects of Political Economy, and on the Cause of the Stagnation of Commerce, trans. John Richter (London: Sherwood, Neely & Jones, 1821) p. 8.Google Scholar
  75. 67.
    Robinson, op. cit. vol. I, p. 189.Google Scholar
  76. 68.
    Chipman, op. cit. pp. 711 and 713. Part 2 The Neo-Classical Theory’.Google Scholar
  77. 69.
    R. Torrens, A Letter to the Right Honourable Lord John Russell, (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green, 1837) p. 143.Google Scholar
  78. 70.
    Malthus, Principles of Political Economy (London: John Murray, 1820) p. 329.Google Scholar
  79. 71.
    Sir W. Sleeman, On Taxes, or Public Revenue (London: Elder & Co., 1829) p. 198.Google Scholar
  80. 72.
    G. Poulett Scrope, Principles of Political Economy (London: Longman, Rees, 1833) pp. 378–82.Google Scholar
  81. 73.
    G. Poulett Scrope, ‘The Political Economists’, Quarterly Review, vol. 44 (1831) p. 24.Google Scholar
  82. 74.
    Arthur I. Bloomfield, ‘Effect of Growth on the Terms of Trade: Some Earlier Views’, Economica, vol. 51 (May 1984).Google Scholar
  83. 75.
    Torrens, Letter to Lord John Russell, op. cit. pp. 132–3.Google Scholar
  84. 76.
    Frank Whitson Fetter, ‘Robbins on Torrens’, Economica (Nov 1958) p. 346.Google Scholar
  85. 77.
    For Senior’s criticism see his article ‘Free Trade and Retaliation’, Edinburgh Review, vol. LXXVIII (July 1843) pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
  86. 78.
    Ibid. p. 42.Google Scholar
  87. 79.
    McCulloch’s critique is to be found on pp. 166–8 of the 1849 ed. of his Principles.Google Scholar
  88. 80.
    McCulloch, Principles (1849) p. 166 and pp. 151–2. O’Brien’s comments are in J. R. McCulloch: A Study in Classical Economics, op. cit. pp. 227–8.Google Scholar
  89. 81.
    For a good discussion of the controversy between Senior and Torrens, see Marian Bowley, op. cit. pp. 225–8.Google Scholar
  90. 82.
    Torrens, The Budget, op. cit. pp. 177 and 66.Google Scholar
  91. 83.
    Torrens, A Letter to Lord John Russell, op. cit. p. 133.Google Scholar
  92. 84.
    Colonel Torrens, Speech in the House of Commons on the Motion for a Reappointment of a Select Committee on Emigration, February 15 1827 (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green, 1828).Google Scholar
  93. Quoted in S. A. Meenai, ‘Robert Torrens 1780–1864’, Economica (Feb 1956) p. 55.Google Scholar
  94. 85.
    R. Davis, The Industrial Revolution and British Overseas Trade (Leicester: Leicester U.P., 1979) p. 75.Google Scholar
  95. 86.
    John Craig, Remarks on Some Fundamental Doctrines of Political Economy (Edinburgh, 1821) pp. 101–2.Google Scholar
  96. 87.
    Hansard, n.s. 18 (1828) cols 1553–5.Google Scholar
  97. 88.
    Torrens’s speech 15 Feb 1827 quoted in F. W. Fetter, op. cit. p. 163.Google Scholar
  98. 89.
    On colonisation schemes and the economists’ involvement in the debate, see R. N. Ghosh, Classical Macroeconomics and the Case for Colonies (Calcutta: New Age, 1967) pp. 25–38 and 228–45.Google Scholar
  99. 90.
    J. S. Mill, Collected Works, op. cit. vol. IV, p. 258.Google Scholar
  100. 91.
    Ibid. p. 251.Google Scholar
  101. 92.
    Ibid. p. 258.Google Scholar
  102. 93.
    Ibid. p. 55.Google Scholar
  103. 94.
    Ibid. p. 70.Google Scholar
  104. 95.
    J. S. Mill, Principles (1852) 5th ed. vol II, p. 163.Google Scholar
  105. 96.
    Mill, Principles (W. J. Ashley ed.) p. 739.Google Scholar
  106. 97.
    Mill, Some Unsettled Questions, op. cit. p. 45.Google Scholar
  107. 98.
    Donald N. McCloskey, ‘Magnanimous Albion: Free Trade and British National Income, 1841–1881’, Explorations in Economic History, vol. 17 (1980) pp. 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. See also criticisms of McCloskey by P. J. Nain in Explorations in Economic History, vol. 19, pp. 201–7, and McCloskey’s reply, ibid. pp. 208–10.Google Scholar
  109. 99.
    See C. P. Kindleberger, Comparative Studies in Trade, Finance and Growth (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P. 1978) p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 100.
    Torrens, An Essay on the Production of Wealth (1821) pp. 288–9.Google Scholar
  111. 101.
    W. Sombart, Die deutsche Volkswirtschaft im neunzehnten Jahrhundert (Berlin, 1913) ch. 14.Google Scholar
  112. 102.
    Hansard, n.s. 12 (1825) col. 1213. When the U.S. Congress increased tariffs sharply in 1828 Huskisson called for retaliation. See Hansard, n.s. 19 (1828) cols 1768–70.Google Scholar
  113. 103.
    J. H. Clapham, An Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. 1 (Cambridge U.P., 1939) p. 479.Google Scholar
  114. 104.
    Lord Welby, Cobden’s Work and Opinions, p. 18, quoted in J. A. Hobson, Richard Cobden: The International Man (London, 1919) p. 20.Google Scholar
  115. 105.
    Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan vol. I, pp. 422–3.Google Scholar
  116. 106.
    Hamilton’s argument was presented in his Report on the Subject of Manufactures (1791) andGoogle Scholar
  117. List’s in The National System of Political Economy (1841) (London: Longman, 1928).Google Scholar
  118. See A. Emmanuel, Profit and Crises (London: Heinemann, 1984) p. 3 n. 4.Google Scholar
  119. 107.
    Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis, op. cit. p. 505.Google Scholar
  120. 108.
    Mill, Principles (W. J. Ashley ed.) (London: Longmans Green, 1909) p. 922.Google Scholar
  121. 109.
    M. C. Kemp, ‘The Mill-Bastable Infant-Industry Dogma’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 68 (Feb 1960), pp. 65–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 110.
    Cobden Club Pamphlet, John Stuart Mill on the Protection of Infant Industries (London, 1911) pp. 11, 13–15, 17.Google Scholar
  123. See also J. S. Mill, Collected Works, vol. 16, ed. F. E. Mineka and D. W. Lindley (Toronto U.P., 1972) pp. 1043–4, 1150–1, 1419–20 and 1520–1.Google Scholar
  124. 111.
    Harry Johnson, ‘A New View of the Infant Industry Argument’, in I. A. McDougall and Richard H. Snape (eds) Studies in International Economics: Monash Conference Papers (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1970) p. 60.Google Scholar
  125. 112.
    Mill, Principles (1848) (W. J. Ashley ed.) p. 581.Google Scholar
  126. 113.
    For a good summary of writings on this and other nineteenth-century issues about trade, technology and growth see Arthur I. Bloomfield, ‘The Impact of Growth and Technology on Trade in Nineteenth-century British Thought’, History of Political Economy, vol. 10, no. 4 (1978) pp. 608–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 114.
    Ricardo, Works, vol. V, pp. 302–3.Google Scholar
  128. 115.
    Ibid. vol. I, pp. 396–7.Google Scholar
  129. 116.
    Ibid. vol. V, p. XX.Google Scholar
  130. 117.
    Hansard, n.s. 13 (1825) col. 1233.Google Scholar
  131. 118.
    Malthus, Additions to the Fourth and Former Editions of Essay on Population (London: John Murray, 1817) p. 108;Google Scholar
  132. 119.
    J. R. McCulloch, On Commerce (London, 1833) p. 9.Google Scholar
  133. 120.
    William Playfair, An Inquiry into the Permanent Causes of the Decline and Fall of Powerful and Wealthy Nations (London, 1805) pp. 212, 203.Google Scholar
  134. 121.
    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Second Series, vol. XVI, (6 Dec 1826) cols 294–5. Alexander Baring (the banker), who introduced Torrens to the House, congratulated him afterwards on his speech: ‘It had been for so long a time the habit to look upon any man as a Goth who dissented from the modern doctrine of political economy’, that it was indeed a pleasure to welcome Torrens to the House. Ibid. col. 296.Google Scholar
  135. 122.
    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Third Series, vol. xxiv, 2 July 1834, col. 1088; vol. XXV, (2 Aug 1834) col. 908.Google Scholar
  136. 123.
    F. W. Fetter, ‘Robert Torrens: Colonel of Marines and Political Economist’, Economica (May 1962) p. 165.Google Scholar
  137. 124.
    Nassau Senior, Three Lectures on the Cost of Obtaining Money and Some Effects of Private and Government Paper Money (1830) op. cit. pp. 25–6, 30.Google Scholar
  138. 125.
    Lord King’s Speech, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) n.s. vol. xxiii (29 Mar 1830) cols 969–70, 969–70, 973–4.Google Scholar
  139. 126.
    For McCulloch’s and Malthus’s testimony before the Committee see Select Committee on Combination Laws, Artisans and Machinery, Parliamentary Papers (1824) vol. V, cols, 592, 596 and 598.Google Scholar
  140. 127.
    H. R. C. Wright, Free Trade and Protection in the Netherlands, 1816–39; A Study of the First Benelux (Cambridge U.P., 1955) p. 130.Google Scholar
  141. 128.
    Report of the Select Committee on the Laws Relating to the Export of Tools and Machinery (30 June 1825) no. 504, p. 15.Google Scholar
  142. 129.
    J. Kennedy, On the Exportation of Machinery (London, 1824) p. 17.Google Scholar
  143. 130.
    J. S. Mill, ‘Of the Laws of Interchange Between Nations’ in Essays on Some Unsettled Questions (London: John Parker, 1844) op. cit. pp. 31–2.Google Scholar
  144. 131.
    ‘Exportation of Machinery’, Westminster Review, III (Apr 1825) pp. 386–94.Google Scholar
  145. 132.
    Mill, op. cit. p. 32.Google Scholar
  146. 133.
    Parliamentary Papers (1841) vol. VII. Testimony of Holland Hooke, p. 52.Google Scholar
  147. 134.
    P. J. Cain, Economic Foundations of British Overseas Expansion 1815–1914 (London: Macmillan, 1980) p. 20.Google Scholar
  148. For a detailed account of the restrictions and the role of Manchester manufacturers see A. E. Musson, ’The “Manchester School” and Exportation of Machinery’, Business History (Jan 1972) pp. 17–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Leonard Gomes 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard Gomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Middlesex PolytechnicLondonUK

Personalised recommendations