Role of Callosal Connections in the Representation of the Visual Field in the Primary Visual Cortex of the Cat

  • G. Berlucchi
  • A. Antonini
  • G. G. Mascetti
  • G. Tassinari
Part of the Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series book series (WGS)


Current ideas about the functional significance of the corpus callosum and other commissures are chiefly derived from studies of the behavioral deficits following commissural sections in both man and experimental animals. The main conclusion supported by these studies is that the forebrain commissures are essential for unifying and coordinating cognitive processes that take place separately and independently in the right and left cerebral hemispheres (Sperry, 1982). Attempts at analyzing this conclusion at the anatomical and physiological levels have provided a considerable amount of data, but the interpretation of the findings has often met with the difficult problem of establishing a common principle of commissural organization within an overall theory of the brain. We believe that the ‘principle of supplemental complementarity’ proposed many years ago by Sperry (1962) is best suited for understanding the available evidence on the anatomy and the physiology of the interhemispheric connections of the cerebral cortex (Berlucchi, Tassinari and Antonini, 1986). In brief, the principle states that the commissural connections are organized in such a way as to allow the activity of each hemisphere to be supplemented with different and complementary information about concurrent activities in the other hemisphere. For example, the representation of each hand in the contralateral somesthetic cortex via the specific sensory pathways can be supplemented and complemented by a representation of the other hand transmitted to the same hemisphere via the corpus callosum. This arrangement is both supplementary, because the representations of the two hands add to one another in each hemisphere, and complementary, because this addition can provide a unitary substrate for the control of bimanual activities.


Corpus Callosum Receptive Field Vertical Meridian Visual Cortical Area Binocular Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albus, K. and Beckmann, R. (1980). Second and third visual areas of the cat: interindividual variability in retinotopic arrangement and cortical location. J. Physiol, (London) 299, 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonini, A., Berlucchi, G. and Lepore, F. (1983). Physiological organization of callosal connections of a visual lateral suprasylvian area in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 49, 902–921.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonini A., Berlucchi, G., Marzi, C.A. and Sprague, J.M. (1979). Importance of corpus callosum for visual receptive fields of single neurons in cat superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 42, 137–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonini A., Berlucchi, G. and Sprague, J.M. (1978). Indirect, across-the-midline retinotectal projections and representation of ipsilateral visual field in superior colliculus of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 41, 285–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonini, A., Di Stefano, M., Minciacchi, D. and Tassinari, G. (1985). Interhemispheric influences on area 19 in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 59, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlucchi, G. and Antonini, A. (in press). The role of the corpus callosum in the representation of the visual field in cortical areas. In Brain Circuits and Functions of the Mind. (ed. C. Trevarthen) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Berlucchi, G. and Marzi, C.A. (1982). Interocular and interhemispheric transfer of visual discrimination in the cat. In Analysis of Visual Behavior (eds. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale and R.J.W. Mansfield) MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  8. Berlucchi, G. and Rizzolatti, G. (1968). Binocularly driven neurons in visual cortex of split-chiasm cats. Science 159, 308–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Berlucchi, G., Tassinari, G. and Antonini, A. (1986). The organization of the callosal connections according to Sperry’s principle of supplemental complementarity. In Two Hemispheres — One Brain (eds. F. Lepore, M. Ptito and H.H. Jasper) Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Blakemore, C. (1969). Binocular depth discrimination and the nasotemporal division. J. Physiol. (London) 205, 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blakemore, C., Diao, Y., Pu, M., Wang, Y. and Xiao, Y. (1983). Possible functions of the interhemispheric connexions between visual cortical areas in the cat. J. Physiol. (London) 337, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choudhury, B.P., Whitteridge, D. and Wilson, M.E. (1965). The function of the callosal connexions of the visual cortex. Quart. J. Exp. Physiol. 50, 214–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, M.L. and Pettigrew, JTD. (1979). A neurophysiological determination of the vertical horopter in the cat and owl. J. Comp. Neurol. J84, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cynader, M., Gardner, J., Dobbins, A., Lepore, F. and Guillemot, J.P. (1986). Interhemispheric communication and binocular vision: Functional and developmental aspects. In Two Hemispheres — One Brain (eds. F. Lepore, M. Ptito and H.H. Jasper) Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Dow, B.M. and Dubner, R. (1971). Single-unit responses to moving stimuli in middle suprasylvian gyrus in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 34, 47–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dreher, B. and Cottee, L.J. (1975). Visual receptive-field properties of cells in area 18 of cat’s cerebral cortex before and after acute lesions in area 17. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 735–750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elberger, A. and Smith, E.L. (1985). The critical period of corpus callosum section to affect cortical binocularity. Exp. Brain Res. 57, 213–223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross, C.G., Bender, D.B. and Mishkin, M. (1977). Contribution of the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure to visual activation of inferior temporal neurons. Brain Res. 131, 227–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey, A.R. (1980). A physiological analysis of subcortical and commissural projections of areas 17 and 18 in the cat. J. Physiol. (London) 302, 507–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubel, D.H. and Wiesel, T.N. (1967). Cortical and callosal connections concerned with the vertical meridian of the visual field. J. Neurophysiol. 30, 1561–1573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirk, D.L., Levick W.R., Cleland, B.G. and Wassle, H. (1976) Crossed and uncrossed representation of the visual field by brisk-sustained and brisk-transient cat retinal ganglion cells. Vision Res.16, 225–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leicester, J. (1968). Projection of the visual vertical meridian to cerebral cortex of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 31, 371–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lepore, F. and Guillemot, J.P. (1982). Visual receptive field properties of cells innervated through the corpus callosum. Exp. Brain Res. 46, 413–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lepore, F., Ptito, M. and Guillemot J.P. (1986). The role of the corpus callosum in midline fusion. In Two Hemispheres — One Brain (eds. F. Lepore, M. Ptito and H.H. Jasper) Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Lepore, F., Ptito, M. and Lassonde, M. (1986). Stereoperception in cats following section of the corpus callosum and/or the optic chiasma. Exp. Brain Res. 61, 258–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Maffei, L., Berardi, N. and Bisti, S. (1986). Interocular transfer of adaptation after effect in neurons of area 17 and 18 of split chiasm cats. J. Neurophysiol. 55, 966–976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marzi, C.A., Antonini, A., Di Sefano, M. and Legg C.R. (1982). The contribution of the corpus callosum to receptive fields in the lateral suprasylvian visual area of the cat. Behav. Brain Res. 4, 155–176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Minciacchi, D. and Antonini, A. (1984). Binocularity in the visual cortex of the adult cat does not depend on the integrity of the corpus callosum. Behav. Brain Res. 13, 183–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers, R.E. (1956). Function of corpus callosum in interocular transfer. Brain 79, 358–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikara, T., Bishop, P.O. and Pettigrew, J.D. (1968). Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 353–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Payne, B.R. (1986). Role of callosal cells in the functional organization of cat striate cortex. In Two Hemispheres — One Brain (eds. F. Lepore, M. Ptito and H.H. Jasper) Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Rocha-Miranda C.E., Bender, D.B., Gross, C.G. and Mishkin, M. (1975). Visual activation of neurons in inferotemporal cortex depends on striate cortex and forebrain commissures. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 475–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sperry, R.W. (1952). Neurology and the mind-brain problem. Am. Sci. 40, 291–312.Google Scholar
  34. Sperry, R.W. (1962). Some general aspect of interhemispheric integration. In Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (ed. V.B. Mountcastle) The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  35. Sperry, R.W. (1982). Some effects of disconnecting the cerebral hemispheres. Science 217, 1223–1226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stone, J. and Fukuda, Y. (1974). The naso-temporal division of the cat’s retina re-examined in terms of Y-, X- and W-cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 155, 377 394.Google Scholar
  37. Timney, B., Elberger, A. and Vandewater, M.L. (1985). Binocular depth perception in the cat following early corpus callosum section. Exp. Brain Res. 60, 19–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tusa, R.J., Palmer, L. and Rosenquist, A.C. (1978). The retinotopic organization of area 17 (striate cortex) in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 177, 213–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tusa, R.J., Rosenquist, A.C. and Palmer, L. (1979). Retinotopic organization of areas 18 and 19 in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 185, 657–678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Von der Heydt, R., Adorjani, C., Hanny, P. and Baumgartner, G. (1978). Disparity sensitivity and receptive field incongruity of units in cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 31, 523–545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitteridge, D. and Clarke, P.G.H. (1982). Ipsilateral visual field represented in the cat’s visual cortex. Neurosci. 7, 1855–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Wenner-Gren Center 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Berlucchi
  • A. Antonini
  • G. G. Mascetti
  • G. Tassinari

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations