Basil

Abstract

It is interesting to attempt to reconstruct some notion of the aesthetic of the novel at the time of writing Basil. It soon becomes clear that Collins’ intention is other than that espoused by the reviewers of his novel in 1852. Indeed what they prescribe, and what is disputed by Collins is the function of the novelist and the social role of literature. In October, 1853, the Westminster Review published a long article on the history of the novel and Collins was taken to task for his unsavoury choice of subject matter in Basil.

There are some subjects on which it is not possible to dwell without offence; and Mr. Collins having first chosen one which could neither please nor elevate, has rather increased the displeasure it excites, by his resolution to spare us no revolting detail…. Mr. Collins … dwells on the details of animal appetite with a persistency which can serve no moral purpose, and may minister to evil passions even while professing condemnation of them.¹