Abstract
Until as recently as the last 10 years the response to crime in Britain has focused largely on the offender. The major pre-occupation has been with whether deterrence or control of criminal activity can be achieved through the punishment, treatment or rehabilitation of offenders by the State. Responding to crime in this way has resulted in little attention being focused on the other party involved in crime, namely the victim.1 The low status afforded to victims by the criminal justice system appears somewhat paradoxical in view of the fact that it is the victim usually who bears the impact of criminal activity and, significantly for the criminal justice system, it is often the victim who determines whether an activity is officially labelled as a crime by deciding to make a report to the police.2 Victim assistance is frequently crucial to criminal justice agents during the investigation of a crime and furthermore, prosecuting and securing a conviction would be very difficult without the co-operation and testimony of a victim as a witness at a court hearing. Yet, despite the obvious usefulness of victims to the criminal justice system recent research on victims has documented how the victim is largely ‘forgotten’ by the system and how his involvement with the system can in fact lead to a ‘secondary victimisation’.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Ashworth, A. (1982), ‘Punishment and Compensation: Victims, Offenders and the State’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 6, no. 1.
Bentham, J. (1975), in J. Hudson and B. Galaway (eds), ‘Political Remedies for the Evil of Offences in Considering the Victim’ (Illinois: Thomas).
Bottoms, A. E. (1983), ‘Neglected Features of Contemporary Penal Systems’ in Power to Punish, D. Garland and P. Young (eds), London: Heinemann.
Burnham, D. (1984), ‘In the Name of Reparation’, Probation Journal, vol. 31, no. 4.
Chambers, G. and Millar, A. (1983), Investigating Sexual Assault, a Scottish Office Social Research Study (Edinburgh: HMSO).
Chambers, G. and Tombs, J. (1984), (eds), The British Crime Survey, Scotland, a Scottish Office Social Research Study (Edinburgh: HMSO).
Christie, N. (1977), ‘Conflicts as Property’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 17.
CICB (1985), Twenty-First Report, Cmnd 9684 (London: HMSO).
Cohen, S. (1979), ‘Community Control — A New Utopia!’, New Society, 15 March.
Criminal Justice (1984), A Working Paper by The Home Office.
Duguid, G. (1982), Community Service in Scotland: the First Two Years (Central Research Unit: Scottish Office).
Fry, M. (1951), Arms of the Law (London: Victor Gollancz).
Gallaway, B. and Hudson, J. (1978). (eds), Offender Restitution in Theory and Action (Lexington: D. C. Heath and Co.).
Galaway, B. and Hudson, J. (1980). (Eds), Victims, Offenders and Alternative Sanctions (Lexington: D. C. Heath and Co.).
Hough, M. and Mayhew, P. (1984), The British Crime Survey: First Report. Home Office Research Study no. 76 (London: HMSO).
Hough, M. and Mayhew, P. (1985), Taking Account of Crime: Key Findings from the 1984 British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study No. 85 (London: HMSO).
Hough, M. and Moxon, D. (1985), ‘Dealing with Offenders: Popular Opinion and the Views of Victims’, The Howard Journal.
Hulsman, L. (1982), ‘Penal Reform in the Netherlands: Part 1 — Bringing the Criminal Justice System Under Control’, The Howard Journal, vol. 20.
Launay, G. (1985), ‘Bringing Victims and Offenders Together’. Comparison of Two Models’, The Howard Journal
Maguire, M. (1982), Burglary in a Dwelling (London: Heinemannvol. 24, no. 3.).
Maher, G. (1986), The Use of Compensation Orders in Scotland Central Research Unit Working Papers (Edinburgh).
Marshall, T. F. (1984), ‘Reparation, Conciliation and Mediation’, Research and Planning Unit Paper 27 (London: Home Office).
Marshall, T. F. and Walpole, M. (1985), Bringing People Together: Mediation and Reparation Projects in Great Britain, Research and Planning Unit Paper 33 (London: Home Office).
Marshall, T. F. (1985), British Initiatives in Mediation and Dispute Resolution in Home Office Research and Planning Unit, Research Bulletin no. 19. (London: HORPU).
Miers, D. (1978), Responses to Victimisation (Abingdon: Professional Books).
Moody, S. R. and Tombs, J. (1982), Prosecution in the Public Interest (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press).
National Association of Probation Officers (1983), Reparation: Policy document (London: NAPO).
Parliamentary All-Party Penal Affairs Group (1984), A New Deal for Victims (London).
Reeves, H. (1984), ‘The Victim and Reparation’, The Probation Journal, vol. 31, no. 4.
Shapland, J., Willmore, J. and Duff, D. (1985), Victims in the Criminal Justice System (1985), Cambridge Studies in Criminology (Aldershot: Gower Press).
Smith, D., Blagg, H. and Demcourt, N. (1984), ‘Does Mediation Work in Practice?’, Probation Journal.
Softley, P. (1977), Compensation Orders in Magistrates Courts, Home Office Research Studies, no. 43 (London: HMSO).
Vennard, J. (1976), ‘Justice and Recompense for Victims of Crime’, New Society (19 February).
Wright, M. (1982), Making Good: Prisons Punishment and Beyond. (London: Burnett Books).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Simon Backett, John McNeill and Alex Yellowlees
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Millar, A. (1988). Imprisonment — in the Victim’s Interest?. In: Backett, S., McNeill, J., Yellowlees, A. (eds) Imprisonment Today. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08897-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08897-3_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08899-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08897-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)