Skip to main content

Imprisonment — in the Victim’s Interest?

  • Chapter
Imprisonment Today
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

Until as recently as the last 10 years the response to crime in Britain has focused largely on the offender. The major pre-occupation has been with whether deterrence or control of criminal activity can be achieved through the punishment, treatment or rehabilitation of offenders by the State. Responding to crime in this way has resulted in little attention being focused on the other party involved in crime, namely the victim.1 The low status afforded to victims by the criminal justice system appears somewhat paradoxical in view of the fact that it is the victim usually who bears the impact of criminal activity and, significantly for the criminal justice system, it is often the victim who determines whether an activity is officially labelled as a crime by deciding to make a report to the police.2 Victim assistance is frequently crucial to criminal justice agents during the investigation of a crime and furthermore, prosecuting and securing a conviction would be very difficult without the co-operation and testimony of a victim as a witness at a court hearing. Yet, despite the obvious usefulness of victims to the criminal justice system recent research on victims has documented how the victim is largely ‘forgotten’ by the system and how his involvement with the system can in fact lead to a ‘secondary victimisation’.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Ashworth, A. (1982), ‘Punishment and Compensation: Victims, Offenders and the State’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 6, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1975), in J. Hudson and B. Galaway (eds), ‘Political Remedies for the Evil of Offences in Considering the Victim’ (Illinois: Thomas).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A. E. (1983), ‘Neglected Features of Contemporary Penal Systems’ in Power to Punish, D. Garland and P. Young (eds), London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, D. (1984), ‘In the Name of Reparation’, Probation Journal, vol. 31, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, G. and Millar, A. (1983), Investigating Sexual Assault, a Scottish Office Social Research Study (Edinburgh: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, G. and Tombs, J. (1984), (eds), The British Crime Survey, Scotland, a Scottish Office Social Research Study (Edinburgh: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1977), ‘Conflicts as Property’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • CICB (1985), Twenty-First Report, Cmnd 9684 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1979), ‘Community Control — A New Utopia!’, New Society, 15 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Justice (1984), A Working Paper by The Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguid, G. (1982), Community Service in Scotland: the First Two Years (Central Research Unit: Scottish Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, M. (1951), Arms of the Law (London: Victor Gollancz).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallaway, B. and Hudson, J. (1978). (eds), Offender Restitution in Theory and Action (Lexington: D. C. Heath and Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaway, B. and Hudson, J. (1980). (Eds), Victims, Offenders and Alternative Sanctions (Lexington: D. C. Heath and Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M. and Mayhew, P. (1984), The British Crime Survey: First Report. Home Office Research Study no. 76 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M. and Mayhew, P. (1985), Taking Account of Crime: Key Findings from the 1984 British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study No. 85 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M. and Moxon, D. (1985), ‘Dealing with Offenders: Popular Opinion and the Views of Victims’, The Howard Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulsman, L. (1982), ‘Penal Reform in the Netherlands: Part 1 — Bringing the Criminal Justice System Under Control’, The Howard Journal, vol. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launay, G. (1985), ‘Bringing Victims and Offenders Together’. Comparison of Two Models’, The Howard Journal

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. (1982), Burglary in a Dwelling (London: Heinemannvol. 24, no. 3.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, G. (1986), The Use of Compensation Orders in Scotland Central Research Unit Working Papers (Edinburgh).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. F. (1984), ‘Reparation, Conciliation and Mediation’, Research and Planning Unit Paper 27 (London: Home Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. F. and Walpole, M. (1985), Bringing People Together: Mediation and Reparation Projects in Great Britain, Research and Planning Unit Paper 33 (London: Home Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. F. (1985), British Initiatives in Mediation and Dispute Resolution in Home Office Research and Planning Unit, Research Bulletin no. 19. (London: HORPU).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miers, D. (1978), Responses to Victimisation (Abingdon: Professional Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, S. R. and Tombs, J. (1982), Prosecution in the Public Interest (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Probation Officers (1983), Reparation: Policy document (London: NAPO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary All-Party Penal Affairs Group (1984), A New Deal for Victims (London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, H. (1984), ‘The Victim and Reparation’, The Probation Journal, vol. 31, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J., Willmore, J. and Duff, D. (1985), Victims in the Criminal Justice System (1985), Cambridge Studies in Criminology (Aldershot: Gower Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Blagg, H. and Demcourt, N. (1984), ‘Does Mediation Work in Practice?’, Probation Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Softley, P. (1977), Compensation Orders in Magistrates Courts, Home Office Research Studies, no. 43 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennard, J. (1976), ‘Justice and Recompense for Victims of Crime’, New Society (19 February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. (1982), Making Good: Prisons Punishment and Beyond. (London: Burnett Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Simon Backett, John McNeill and Alex Yellowlees

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Millar, A. (1988). Imprisonment — in the Victim’s Interest?. In: Backett, S., McNeill, J., Yellowlees, A. (eds) Imprisonment Today. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08897-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics