Skip to main content

The Effects of Taxing Unemployment Insurance Benefits Accounting For Induced Labor Supply Responses

  • Chapter
The Distributional Impacts of Public Policies

Abstract

Taxation of Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits has been a topic of debate for more than a decade. Arguments for and against taxation revolve around issues of equity, efficiency, and redistributive objectives. The debate bore fruit in 1979 with the passage of legislation which provides for partial taxation of UI benefits. Because the legislation falls short of total taxation and leaves unsettled most of the analytic issues, this paper adds to this debate by presenting new estimates of tax induced changes in total revenues which account for the potential labor force responses to taxation of UI. Estimates of the impact of full taxation are compared to similar estimates for a world in which UI benefits are totally excluded from the tax base (the recent past), and also to the situation which prevails under current law. New information regarding the income replacement function and work disincentive effects of UI under alternative tax schemes is also presented. All of the estimates are based on data from the Survey of Income and Education (SIE). The method of analysis is microsimulation.

This research was supported in part by funds granted to the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare pursuant to the provisions of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964. The authors are grateful to Daniel Hamermesh and Olivia Mitchell for helpful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BETSON, D., GREENBERG, D. and KASTEN, R. (1980) ‘A Micro-Simulation Model for Analyzing Alternative Welfare Reform Proposals: An Application to the Program for Better Jobs and Income’, in R. HAVEMAN and K. HOLLENBECK (eds) (1980) Microeconomic Simulation Models for Public Policy Analysis (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BURGESS, P. L. and KINGSTON, J. L. (1976) ‘The Impact of Unemployment Insurance Benefits on Reemployment Success’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30 (1): 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EHRENBERG, R. G. and OAXACA, R. L. (1976) ‘Unemployment Insurance, Duration of Unemployment, and Subsequent Wage Gain’, American Economic Review 66 (5): 754–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • FELDSTEIN, M. (1974) ‘Unemployment Compensation: Adverse Incentives and Distributional Anomalies’, National Tax Journal, 27 (2): 231–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • HALPIN, T. C. (1979) ‘The Effects of Unemployment Insurance on Seasonal Fluctuations in Employment’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 32 (3): 353–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAMERMESH, D. (1977) Jobless Pay and the Economy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAMERMESH, D. (1982) ‘What is an Appropriate Benefit Level for the Unemployed?’, in P. M. Sommers (ed.) (1982) Welfare Reform in America (Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • HUTCHENS, R. (1979) ‘The Effect of Policy Parameters Changes and the Distribution of Unemployment Insurance Benefits’, National Tax Journal, 32 (4): 513–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIEFER, N. and NEUMAN, G. R. (1978) ‘Structural and Reduced Form Analyses of the Duration of Unemployment’, NBER Conference on Low Income Labor Markets. 9 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIEFER, N. and NEUMAN, G. R. (1979) ‘An Empirical Job Search Model, with a Test of the Constant Reservation Wage Hypothesis’, Journal of Political Economy, 87 (1): 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LANCASTER, T. (1979) ‘Econometric Methods for the Duration of Unemployment’, Econometrica, 47 (4): 939–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MUNTS, R. (1976) ‘Policy Developments in Unemployment Insurance’, Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper, No. 361–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • MUSGRAVE, R. and MUSGRAVE, P. (1980) Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • NICKELL, S. (1979) ‘Estimating the Probability of Leaving Unemployment’, Econometrica, 47 (5): 1249–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SANDELL, S. (1980) ‘Job Search by Unemployed Women: Determinants by Asking Wages’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 33 (3): 368–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SUNLEY, E. (1977) ‘Employee Benefits and Transfer Payments’, In J. A. Pechman (ed.) Comprehensive Income Taxation (Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution) 75–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Us Congress 1978 House. A Bill to Amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (95th Congress, 2nd Session, HR12078: 129–31).

    Google Scholar 

  • WARNER, J., POINDEXTER, J. and FEARN, R. (1980) ‘Employer-Employee Interaction and the Duration of Unemployment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94 (2): 213–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WELCH, F. (1977) ‘What Have We Learned from Empirical Studies of Unemployment Insurance?’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 36 (4): 451–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Policy Studies Organization

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Betson, D.M., Warlick, J.L., Smeeding, T.M. (1988). The Effects of Taxing Unemployment Insurance Benefits Accounting For Induced Labor Supply Responses. In: Danziger, S.H., Portney, K.E. (eds) The Distributional Impacts of Public Policies. Policy Studies Organization Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08888-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics