Abstract
The first half of the 1980s has been a particularly volatile period for state government finance. In 1980 and 1981, a large number of states reduced taxes in response to the ‘tax revolt’ movement initiated by California’s Proposition 13. In 1982 and 1983 the trend towards lower taxes was reversed, as many states battled recession-induced fiscal crises by raising tax rates. In 1985 the trend was again reversed, as 14 states lowered their personal income taxes and one lowered its sales tax (Gold, 1986). The future direction of state tax policy is particularly uncertain given the possibility of federal tax reform, especially if it includes the elimination of state and local tax deductibility, and the likelihood of major cuts in funding of federal domestic spending programs and grants.
I would like to acknowledge the generous assistance of Heather Pritchard. Without her advice and guidance in building the simulation model this research could not have been carried out. The Massachusetts Income Tax Simulation Model is a direct outgrowth of models of the California state tax system which were developed with Howard Chernick. I relied heavily on his support and advice in developing the Massachusetts model. Daniel Pliskin provided able research assistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
CHERNICK, H. and RESCHOVSKY, A. (1982) ‘The Distributional Impact of Proposition 13: A Microsimulation Approach’, National Tax Journal, 35 (2): 149–70.
CHERNICK, H. and RESCHOVSKY, A. (1985) ‘The Taxation of Social Security’, National Tax Journal, 38 (2): 141–52.
CHERNICK, H. and RESCHOVSKY, A. (1986) ‘Federal Tax Reform and the Financing of State and Local Governments’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5 (4): 683–706.
GOLD, S. D. (1986) ‘State and Local Tax Systems in the Mid-1980s’, Legislative Finance Paper, No. 52, National Conference of State Legislatures, Denver, Colorado.
HAVEMAN, R. H. and HOLLENBECK, K. (EDS) (1980) Microsimulation Models for Public Policy Analysis 2 Volumes (New York: Academic Press).
MUSGRAVE, R. A., CASE, K. E. and LEONARD, H. (1974) ‘The Distribution of Fiscal Burdens and Benefits’, Public Finance Quarterly, 2: 259–311.
ORCUTT, G., CALDWELL, S. and WERTHEIMER, R. (1976) Policy Exploration through Microanalytic Simulation (Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute).
PECHMAN, J. and OKNER, B. A. (1974) Who Bears the Tax Burden? (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution).
PHARES, D. (1980) Who Pays State and Local Taxes? (Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain).
RESCHOVSKY, A., TOPAKIAN, G., CARRE, F., CRANE, R., MILLER, P., and SMOKE, P. (1983) State Tax Policy: Evaluating the Issues (Cambridge, Mass.: Joint Center for Urban Studies of MIT and Harvard University).
WEINBERG, D. H. (1985) ‘Who Doesn’t Bear the Tax Burden? The Distribution of Tax Expenditures’, Technical Analysis Paper, No. 31, Office of Income Security Policy, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C..
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Policy Studies Organization
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reschovsky, A. (1988). Microsimulation Models and State Tax Reform: The Case of Massachusetts. In: Danziger, S.H., Portney, K.E. (eds) The Distributional Impacts of Public Policies. Policy Studies Organization Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08888-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08888-1_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08890-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08888-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)