Advertisement

Introduction: The Distributional Impacts of Public Policies

  • Sheldon H. Danziger
  • Kent E. Portney
Part of the Policy Studies Organization Series book series (PSOS)

Abstract

Over the past 20 years economists, political scientists, sociologists, and other social scientists have put substantial effort into examining the different kinds of ‘distributional impacts’ of various public policies. The disciplines begin with different underlying theories and notions of what are the interesting and important questions. For example, economists often study the trade-offs between efficiency and the achievement of a particular distribution of benefits (Okun, 1975; Thurow, 1980), sociologists are more interested in a policy’s implications for the perpetuation and modification of class differences in society (Parkin, 1971; Heller, 1972), and political scientists focus on theories of power and regime stability (Russett, 1964; Midlarksy and Tanter, 1967) and more recently on the nature of domestic policy-making processes (Lowi, 1964; Lowi, 1972; Ripley and Franklin, 1980).

Keywords

Child Support Income Class Absent Father Social Security Benefit Reagan Administration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DANZIGER, S. H. and PLOTNICK, R. (1982) ‘The War on Income Poverty: Achievements and Failures’, in P. M. Sommers (ed.) (1982) Welfare Reform in America, p. 31–52 (Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff).Google Scholar
  2. HELLER, C. (ed.) (1972) Structured Social Inequality: A Reader in Comparative Social Stratification (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  3. JONES, B. D. (1981) ‘Assessing the Products of Government: What Gets Distributed?’ Policy Studies Journal, 9 (7): 963–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. LOWI, T. (1964) ‘American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory’, World Affairs, 16 (4): 677–715.Google Scholar
  5. LOWI, T. (1972) ‘Four Systems of Politics, Policy, and Choice’, Public Administration Review, 32: 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. MIDLARSKY, M. and TANTER, R. (1967) ‘Toward a Theory of Political Instability in Latin America’, Journal of Peace Research, 3: 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. OKUN, A. M. (1975) Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
  8. PARKIN, F. (1971) Class Inequality and Political Order: Social Stratification in Capitalist and Communist Societies (London: MacGibbons & Kee).Google Scholar
  9. PECHMAN, J. A. and OKNER, B. A. (1974) Who Bears the Tax Burden? (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
  10. RIPLEY, R. B. and FRANKLIN, G. A. (1980) Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey).Google Scholar
  11. RUSSETT, B. M. (1964) ‘Inequality and Instability: The Relation of Land Tenure to Politics’, World Politics, 16 (3): 442–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. SMEEDING, T. M. (1982) ‘The Antipoverty Effects of In-Kind Transfers’, Policy Studies Journal, 10: 499–521.Google Scholar
  13. STEINER, G. (1971) The State of Welfare (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
  14. STOREY, J. (1983) Older Americans in the Reagan Era: Impacts of Federal Policy Changes (Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute).Google Scholar
  15. THUROW, L. (1980) The Zero Sum Society: Distribution and the Possibilities for Economic Change (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Policy Studies Organization 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheldon H. Danziger
  • Kent E. Portney

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations