Skip to main content

Productivity and Social Goals: A Case Study from Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Chapter
Promoting Productivity in the Public Sector

Part of the book series: Policy Studies Organization Series ((PSOS))

  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

This study looks at the tension between productivity and social goals as they are manifested in procurement processes in local government. The renewed interest in productivity (primarily an ‘efficiency’ goal) and programs designed to achieve social goals provides us with an opportunity to reassess some of the criticisms made by the New Public Administration group in the late 1960s.

The author thanks Professor Michael A. Pagano of Miami University for assistance in clarifying some of the ideas presented herein and for reviewing earlier drafts of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • City of Cincinnati (1982), Ordinance #61–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Cincinnati (1983a), Ordinance # 32–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Cincinnati (1983b), Resolution # R139/1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, R. (1920), Governmental Purchasing ( New York: Harper and Bros Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, H. G. (1971), ‘Toward a new public administration’, in Frank Marini (ed.), Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective, pp. 309–31 ( New York: Chandler Publishing Co. ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, M. M. (1971), ‘Normative theory and public administration: Some suggestions for a redefinition of administrative responsibility’, in Frank Marini (ed.), Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective, pp. 172–89 ( New York: Chandler Publishing Co. ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, N. S. (1980), ‘The productivity challenge’, in Charles H. Levine (ed.), Managing fiscal stress: The crisis in the public sector, p. 260 ( Chatham: Chatham House Publishers, Inc. ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. M. (1975), Equality and Efficiency: The Big Trade Off ( Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, R.et al. (1977), ‘Public sector productivity: Background and analysis with special attention to state governments’ (Austin: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • US General Accounting Office (1983), ‘Increased use of productivity management can help control government costs’ (Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Policy Studies Organization

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shumavon, D.H. (1988). Productivity and Social Goals: A Case Study from Cincinnati, Ohio. In: Kelly, R.M. (eds) Promoting Productivity in the Public Sector. Policy Studies Organization Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08885-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics