The Use of Indicators and Measures of the R & D Process in Evaluating Science and Technology Programmes

  • Albert H. Rubenstein
  • Eliezer Geisler
Part of the Policy Studies Organization Series book series (PSOS)


In the past decade there has been an increase in the demands imposed on R & D performing units and organizations, in both industry and government, to evaluate the contribution of R & D to longer-term organizational goals. Decisionmakers in the R & D units and in other parts of the organization are aware of the complexity of the R & D process and of the inadequacy of routine evaluation methods when transposed to the R & D innovation area.


Flow Model Technical Field Downstream Flow Output Indicator Technical Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Geisler, E. and M. Radnor (1976) ‘An Operational Approach to Monitoring Change in Organization Design’, ch. 9 in The Management of Organization Design, Part 2, Research and Methodology. New York/Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Geisler, E., A. H. Rubenstein and J. Soderstrom (1978) ‘Analysis of Q-Sort of Priorities of Environmental R & D Objectives by the Technical Advisory Group.’ Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  3. Ling, J. G. et al. (1978) Evaluative Study of the Materials Research Laboratory Program: Summary Report. Mclean, VA: The MITRE Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. MacAulay, J. (1980) ‘A Family of Research Indicators Derived from a Bibliometric Analysis’, paper prepared for OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.Google Scholar
  5. Martin, B. R. and J. Irvine (1980) ‘Assessing Basic Research: Some Partial Indicators of Scientific Progress in Radio-Astronomy’, paper presented at the Science and Technology Indicators Conference, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Martin, B. R. and J. Irvine (1983) ‘Assessing Basic Research: The Case of the Isaac Newton Telescope’, Social Studies of Science, 13, (1), 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rubenstein, A. H. (1979) ‘Industry-Government Interaction Affecting the Industrial Research and Development (RD/I) Process’, in A. Gerstenfeld and R. Brainard (eds) Government/Industry Cooperation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Rubenstein, A. H. (1978b) ‘The Role of Imbedded Technology in the Industrial Innovation Process’, paper prepared for the US Congress Joint Economic Committee.Google Scholar
  9. Rubenstein, A. H. (1980) ‘Research and Development Issues in Developing Countries’, in B. V. Dean and J. D. Goldhar (eds), Management of Research and Innovation. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  10. Rubenstein, A. H. and E. Geisler (1978a) ‘Potential Indicators and Measures of Downstream Outputs of the R & D/Innovation Process in Several Sectors of Science and Technology’, paper presented to the American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  11. Rubenstein, A. H. and E. Geisler (1978b) Selection and Monitoring of Science and Technology Projects in Brazil. Brazil: Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos.Google Scholar
  12. Rubenstein, A. H. and E. Geisler (1979) ‘A Pilot Study on R & D Output Indicators for Selected Program of the National Bureau of Standards,’ Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  13. Terleckyj, N. E. (1974) Effects of R & D on the Productivity Growth of Industries: An Exploratory Study. Washington DC: National Planning Association.Google Scholar
  14. Walsh, J. (1976) ‘R & D and Economic Growth: Renewed Interest in Federal Role’, Science, 193, 1101–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Policy Studies Organization 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert H. Rubenstein
  • Eliezer Geisler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations