Abstract
Imre Salusinszky’s Criticism in Society is the post-modern moment in the history of the “function of criticism at the present time” polemic: politically correct, theoretically extreme, relentlessly dialogic, and self-congratulatory in its self-reference. A series of interviews conducted by Salusinszky with nine members of the literary-theoretical establishment (Jacques Derrida, Northrop Frye, Harold Bloom, Geoffrey Hartman, Frank Kermode, Edward Said, Barbara Johnson, Frank Lentricchia, and J. Hillis Miller), Criticism in Society undertakes both to answer the ever-vexed question of criticism’s social role and to enact a response. This is to be achieved by two means. First, as the interviews progress, each critic is shown the dialogues which have taken place before his or her own, resulting in a kind of interweaving of voices, commentaries on commentaries. Further, the interviewees are asked to comment on Wallace Stevens’ “Not Ideas about the Thing but the Thing Itself”, in order to demonstrate “some of the practical consequences of different theoretical positions” (p. 5). The former strategy reveals a great deal about the interviewees; the latter about the concerns of the interviewer, with whom the success or failure of this book lies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cf. Jacques Derrida, “Plato’s Pharmacy”, in Dissemination tr. with an introduction and additional notes by Barbara Johnson (London: Athlone Press, 1981) pp. 61–171, esp. pp. 169–71.
Louis Althusser, quoted in W. T. J. Mitchell, Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, (1986) p. 206.
George Bornstein, Poetic Remaking: The Art of Browning, Yeats and Pound (University Park, Pa, and London: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1988) p. 58.
Wayne Booth, “M. H. Abrams: Historian as Critic, Critic as Pluralist”, Critical Inquiry, 2:3 (Spring 1976) 426. Cf. also
Jerome McGann, “Romanticism and the Embarrassments of Critical Tradition”, Modern Philology, 70:3 (Feb 1973) 243–57; and
J. Hillis Miller, “Tradition and Difference”, Diacritics, 2:4 (Winter 1972) 6–13.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stoudt, C. (1991). Imre Salusinszky, Criticism in Society; M. H. Abrams, The Correspondent Breeze: Essays on English Romanticism. In: Gould, W. (eds) Yeats Annual No. 8. Yeats Annual. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08861-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08861-4_26
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08863-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08861-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)