Fundamentalism as Counter-culture: Protestants in Urban South India

  • Lionel Caplan

Abstract

The term ‘fundamentalism’ is said to have first seen the light of day in 1920 when the editor of a prominent Baptist paper, alarmed at what he saw as the ‘havoc ’wrought by ‘rationalism’ and ‘worldliness’ in American Protestant churches, coined the term and defined fundamentalists as ‘those ready to do battle royal for the Fundamentals of Protestantism’ (Sandeen, 1970, p. 246; also Marsden, 1980, p. 159).l These fundamentals have from time to time been reiterated by the orthodox Protestant churches. In 1910, for example, the northern Presbyterian General Assembly adopted a declaration of Essential Doctrines: (i) Biblical inerrancy; (ii) Virgin Birth of Jesus Christ; (iii) His substitutionary atonement; (iv) His bodily resurrection; and (v) the factuality or authenticity of miracles. Richard Niebuhr, in the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences (1937), listed these same beliefs as the ‘five points of fundamentalism’. It is worth noting, however, that in some proclamations of the core doctrines prior to 1910 the Second Coming was included, and Sandeen insists that earlier fundamentalists showed ‘no particular preference for five rather than fourteen, nine, or seven articles’ (1970, p. xiv). So the basic fundamentals themselves are periodically re-constituted — the ‘sacred history’ re-constructed (Sami Zubaida in this volume, Chapter 2). More importantly for our present purposes, the ‘essentials’ may also be re-formulated in as much as in certain periods and contexts some doctrines are left unstressed, while others are elaborated.

Keywords

Clay Migration Europe Assure Infertility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barr, J. (1977), Fundamentalism (London: SCM Press).Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. (1963), ‘Charisma and religious innovation: the social location of Israelite prophecy’, Amer. Soc. Rev., 28, pp. 940–50.Google Scholar
  3. Berreman, G. D. (1964), ‘Brahmins and shamans in Pahari religion’, J. Asian. Stud., 23, pp. 53–69.Google Scholar
  4. Caldwell, R. (1886), ‘On demonolatry in southern India,’ Journ. Anth. Soc. Bombay, 2, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar
  5. Caplan, L. (1985), ‘The popular culture of evil in urban south India’, in D. J. Parkin (ed.), The Anthropology of Evil (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, S. (1980), Let the Indian Church be Indian (Madras: Christian Literature Society).Google Scholar
  7. Daniel, J. (1980), Another Daniel (Madras: The Laymen’s Evangelical Fellowship).Google Scholar
  8. David, I. (1983), God’s Messengers: Reformed Church in America Missionaries in South India, 1839–1938, Doctor of Theology Thesis, Lutheran School of Theology, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings 19721977 (ed. C. Gordon) (Brighton: Harvester).Google Scholar
  10. George, T. C. (1975), The Growth of Pentecostal Churches in South India, M. A. thesis in Missiology, Fuller Theological Seminary, California.Google Scholar
  11. Gilsenan, M. (1982), Recognizing Islam: an Anthropologists Introduction (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
  12. Hall, S. (1981), ‘Notes on deconstructing “the popular”’, in R. Samuel (ed.) People’s History and Socialist Theory (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  13. Hill, C. (1983), ‘Science and magic in seventeenth-century England’, in R. Samuel and G. Stedman Jones (eds), Culture, Ideology, and Politics (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  14. Hollenweger, W. J. (1972), The Pentecostals (London: SCM Press).Google Scholar
  15. Kiernan, J. P. (1982), ‘Authority and enthusiasm: the organization of religious experience in Zulu Zionist churches’, in J. Davis (ed.), Religious Organization and Religious Experience (London: Academic).Google Scholar
  16. Kurien, G. (1981), Mission and Proclamation: the Church in India Today and other pieces (Madras: Christian Literature Society).Google Scholar
  17. Macfarlane, A. (1985), ‘The root of all evil’, in D. J. Parkin (ed.) The Anthropology of Evil (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  18. Marsden, G. (1980), Fundamentalism and American Culture: the Shaping of Twentieth-century Evangelicalism 1870–1925 (Oxford University Press). Neill, S. (1964), A History of Christian Missions (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
  19. Niebuhr, H. R. (1937), ‘Fundamentalism’, Encycl. Soc. Sc., 6, pp. 526–7.Google Scholar
  20. Norman, E. (1981), Christianity in the Southern Hemisphere: the Churches in Latin America and South Africa (Oxford: Clarendon).Google Scholar
  21. Sandeen, E. (1970), The Roots of Fundamentalism: British and American Millenarianism 1800–1930 (London: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  22. Sargunam, E. (1974), Multiplying Churches in Modern India (Madras: Evangelical Church of India).Google Scholar
  23. Sharpe, E. (1965), Not to Destroy but to Fulfil: the Contribution of J. N. Farquhar to Protestant Missionary Thought in India before 1914 (Uppsala: Gleerup).Google Scholar
  24. Shaw, B. (1946), Saint Joan (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, D. (1985) ‘Theological thoughts about evil’, in D. J. Parkin (ed.), The Anthropology of Evil (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  26. Turton, A. (1984), ‘Limits of ideological domination and the formation of social consciousness’, in A. Turton and S. Tanabe (eds), History and Peasant Consciousness in South East Asia (Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology).Google Scholar
  27. Weber, M. (1964), The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (London: Collier-Macmillan).Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, B. (1973), Magic and the Millenium (London: Paladin).Google Scholar
  29. Worsley, P. (1970), The Trumpet Shall Sound: a Study ofCargo Cults’ in Melanesia (London: Paladin).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lionel Caplan 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lionel Caplan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations