NATO Doctrine and National Operational Priorities: The Central Front and the Flanks: Part II

  • Peter Stratmann
Part of the International Institute for Strategic Studies Conference Papers book series (IISSCP)

Abstract

Even at the risk of straying from the given subject, it must be pointed out right away why the national operational priorities of the NATO countries are considerably less important than their national political and strategic priorities. Definitive decisions made at these higher levels determine the interpretation of NATO doctrine and condition the operational choices made in view of its implementation. This applies to the fixing of budgetary priorities, levels and composition of forces, and especially to the importance attributed to the tasks of NATO defence in Europe compared with other national objectives and requirements.

Keywords

Europe Coherence Assure Turkey Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    General Sir Nigel Bagnall, ‘Concepts of Land/Air Operations in the Central Region’, RUSI Journal, September 1984, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    Ibid; see also General Leopold Chalupa, The Defence of Central Europe: Implications of Change’, RUSI Journal, March 1985, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for Strategic Studies 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Stratmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations