Skip to main content

Exemplars of Fine Art and Taste

  • Chapter
Kant’s Aesthetic
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

The second condition of a work of fine art being an exemplar is that it should be beautiful. Kant does not explicitly say that this beauty is dependent and not free beauty; but that appears to be a direct consequence of what he does say. Something has ‘dependent’ rather than ‘free’ beauty, when what that thing is intended to be, and its perfection, enter into the judgement of its beauty. Since Kant explicitly states that they do so in the case of fine art, it seems to follow that the beauty of fine art is dependent beauty. Kant says,

since the agreement of the manifold in a thing with an inner character belonging to it as its end constitutes the perfection of the thing, it follows that in estimating beauty of art the perfection of the thing must be also taken into account — a matter which in estimating a beauty of nature, as beautiful, is quite irrelevant.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 173; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §48, p. 311, lines 24–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 72; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 229, line 10-p. 230, line 20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meredith, Teleological Judgement, p. 24; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §65, p. 375, line 26-p. 376, line 2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kant’s emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meredith, Teleological Judgement, p. 23; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §65, p. 375, lines 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meredith, Teleological Judgement, p. 23; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §65, p. 375, lines 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meredith, Teleological Judgement, pp. 20–1; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §65, p. 373, lines 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 80; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §17, p. 235, lines 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bosanquet, History of Aesthetics, p. 406.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 74; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 231, lines 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 167; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §45, p. 306, lines 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Plato, Phaedrus, 259b-c.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goya, The Disparates or Proverbios.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 175; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §49, p. 313, lines 30–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 183; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §50, p. 319, lines 24–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 174; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §48, p. 312, line 28-p. 313, line 2.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 179–80; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §49, p. 317, lines 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 175; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §49, p. 313, lines 30–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 174; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §48, p. 312, line 28-p. 313, line 2.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 171–2; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §47, p. 310, lines 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 182; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §50, p. 319, lines 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 183; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §50, p. 319, lines 24–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 186–7; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §51, p. 321, line 36-p. 323, line 3.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 171–2; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §47, p. 310, lines 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 182–3; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §50, p. 319, lines 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 31; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, Einleitung vn, p. 190, lines 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Mary A. McCloskey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCloskey, M.A. (1987). Exemplars of Fine Art and Taste. In: Kant’s Aesthetic. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08796-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics