Abstract
The second condition of a work of fine art being an exemplar is that it should be beautiful. Kant does not explicitly say that this beauty is dependent and not free beauty; but that appears to be a direct consequence of what he does say. Something has ‘dependent’ rather than ‘free’ beauty, when what that thing is intended to be, and its perfection, enter into the judgement of its beauty. Since Kant explicitly states that they do so in the case of fine art, it seems to follow that the beauty of fine art is dependent beauty. Kant says,
since the agreement of the manifold in a thing with an inner character belonging to it as its end constitutes the perfection of the thing, it follows that in estimating beauty of art the perfection of the thing must be also taken into account — a matter which in estimating a beauty of nature, as beautiful, is quite irrelevant.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 173; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §48, p. 311, lines 24–9.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 72; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 229, line 10-p. 230, line 20.
Meredith, Teleological Judgement, p. 24; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §65, p. 375, line 26-p. 376, line 2.
Kant’s emphasis.
Meredith, Teleological Judgement, p. 23; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §65, p. 375, lines 7–10.
Meredith, Teleological Judgement, p. 23; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §65, p. 375, lines 10–14.
Meredith, Teleological Judgement, pp. 20–1; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §65, p. 373, lines 6–13.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 21–4.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 16–18.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 80; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §17, p. 235, lines 17–25.
Bosanquet, History of Aesthetics, p. 406.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 74; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 231, lines 3–10.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 21–31.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 14–20.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 73; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §16, p. 230, lines 14–20.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 167; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §45, p. 306, lines 27–34.
Plato, Phaedrus, 259b-c.
Goya, The Disparates or Proverbios.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 175; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §49, p. 313, lines 30–4.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 183; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §50, p. 319, lines 24–7.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 174; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §48, p. 312, line 28-p. 313, line 2.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 179–80; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §49, p. 317, lines 6–19.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 175; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §49, p. 313, lines 30–4.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 174; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §48, p. 312, line 28-p. 313, line 2.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 171–2; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §47, p. 310, lines 20–3.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 182; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §50, p. 319, lines 15–17.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 183; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §50, p. 319, lines 24–7.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 186–7; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §51, p. 321, line 36-p. 323, line 3.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 171–2; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §47, p. 310, lines 20–3.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 182–3; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §50, p. 319, lines 17–34.
Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 31; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, Einleitung vn, p. 190, lines 13–21.
Copyright information
© 1987 Mary A. McCloskey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCloskey, M.A. (1987). Exemplars of Fine Art and Taste. In: Kant’s Aesthetic. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08796-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08796-9_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08798-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08796-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)