Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
Kant’s Aesthetic
  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this book is to show that the Critique of Aesthetic Judgement is not a set of disconnected remarks about aesthetic matters more interesting because of the distinction of their author and their place in the history of the subject than in their own right. That work can be seen to present an integrated theory whose scope, depth and suggestive power mark it as deserving of study by all who work in the field of philosophical aesthetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Richard Wollheim, Art and Its Objects; an Introduction to Aesthetics (New York and Evanston, 1968), sections 42–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art — an Approach to the Theory of Symbols (Indianapolis, New York, 1969) ch. vi, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. G. Collingwood, The Principles of Art (Oxford, 1938) ch. v.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James Creed Meredith, Kant’s The Critique of Judgement, translated with Analytical Indexes (Oxford, 1952, originally published 1911) p. 62; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §11, p. 221, lines 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall Cohen, ‘Aesthetic Essence’, in Philosophy in America ed. Max Black (London, 1964) pp. 115–33;

    Google Scholar 

  6. ‘Appearance and the Aesthetic Attitude’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 56 (1959) pp. 915–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. George Dickie, The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 1 (1964) pp. 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meredith, Critique of Judgement, Part I, Critique of Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 146–7; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §38, p.289, line 30-p.290, line 14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 175–6; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §49, p. 313, line 35-p. 314, line 8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, pp. 168–9, 181; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §46, p. 308, lines 1–5; §49, p. 318, lines 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 168; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, §46, p. 307, lines 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meredith, Aesthetic Judgement, p. 31; Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, Einleitung vn, p. 190, lines 20–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Mary A. McCloskey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCloskey, M.A. (1987). Introduction. In: Kant’s Aesthetic. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08796-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics