Skip to main content
  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

The Commission was, after the state, the largest employer in Great Britain, its staffrising to a total of 880 503 by 1953. The range of skills and occupations it covered was enormous, and it had inherited a great variety of labour relationships, including both statutory and nonstatutory negotiating machinery. It had to deal with a large number of trade unions, and there were no exclusive relationships between individual Executives and individual unions. The National Union of Railwaymen, for instance, had members among the staffs of each of the Executives.1 In some cases unions were federated for negotiating purposes, as in the Railway Shopmen’s National Council: in others, a single grade of worker might be in either of two unions, as in the case of railway footplate staff. The great majority of the labour force was unionised; but acquisition of some road haulage businesses had swelled the element of non-union labour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Bagwell, The Railwaymen, vol. 1 (London, 1963) p. 604.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Section 5(9)(b).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Section 95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bagwell, The Railwaymen, vol. 1, p. 639.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BTC AR 1948, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a detailed account of these negotiations, see Bagwell, The Railwaymen, vol. 1, pp. 605–616.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 623.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 603.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barker and Robbins, History of London Transport, vol. 2, p. 352.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. A. Clegg, Labour Relations in London Transport, (Oxford, 1950) p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  11. BTC AR 1948, p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GWR drivers had retired under company rules at 60; the Railway Executive raised the age to 65, to conform with the general practice — not improving the image of nationalisation!

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bagwell, The Railwaymen, vol. 1, p. 660.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. R. Bonavia, The Birth of British Rail, London, 1979, p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. S. McLeod, All Change (London, 1970) p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bagwell, The Railwaymen, vol. 1, p. 616.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barker and Robbins, History of London Transport, vol. 2, p. 352.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Michael R. Bonavia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonavia, M.R. (1987). Labour Relations. In: The Nationalisation of British Transport. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08793-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics