Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s/Macmillan Series ((STANTS))

  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

The promulgation of Institutional Act Number 5 inaugurated the third political cycle of the ‘1964 revolution’. It started a period in which the resort to repression in all its dimensions and the exercise of arbitrary powers would reach the highest level ever seen in Brazilian political history. In contrast to earlier Institutional Acts issued by the regime to block and purge the ‘adverse forces of the revolution’, the new Act indicated (by the absence of an expiry date) that the so-called ‘Revolution’ had become permanent. If the AI-1 decreed in 1964 and the AI-2 of 1966 limited the President’s exercise of arbitrary power to a definite period of time, the AI-5 meant that exceptional powers were to be used, not only as a corrective measure but also as a preventive instrument to retain the ‘revolutionary process’ along its course. Thus the AI-5 provided clear indications that from then on the power of the ‘revolution’ was to last until the revolutionary command decided that the country was prepared for a return to democracy. The ‘ideals of the revolution’ would again be recalled to justify repression. As the prologue of the AI-5 restated, the ‘revolutionary process’ aimed at

giving the country a regime which, taking into consideration the requirements of a juridical and political system, would assure an authentic democratic order based on freedom, on the respect for human dignity, on the fight against subversion and ideologies contrary to the traditions of our people, on the fight against corruption, thereby searching for the indispensable means for the economic, financial, political and moral reconstruction of Brazil.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Quoted in C. C. Branco’s article of 6 March 1969, republished in C. C. Branco, Os Militares no Poder, vol. 3 (Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1979), p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Schneider, The Political System of Brazil, p. 291. On the armed struggle actions see João Quartim, Dictatorship and Armed Struggle in Brazil (London: NLB, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  3. and Fernando Portela, Guerra de guerrilhas no Brasil (São Paulo: Global, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. There is a vast literature about the class nature of the state and on the role of the technocracy. The main works are: Florestan Fernandes, A Revolução Burguesa no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Octavio Ianni, Estado e Planejamento Economico no Brasil (1930–1970) (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 3rd edn 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fernando H. Cardoso, O Modelo Politico Brasileiro e outros Ensaios (São Paulo: DIFEL, 1972), and Autoritarismo e Democratização (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 3rd edn, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sérgio Abranches, ‘The Divided Leviathan: State and Economic Policy Formation in Authoritarian Brazil’ (Cornell University Ph.D. thesis, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peter Evans, Dependent Development: the alliance of Multi-national, State and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Renato Boschi and Eli D. Cerqueira, O Empresariado Nacional e o Estado no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carlos E. Martins, Capitalismo de Estado e Modelo Politico no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carlos E. Martins (org.), Estado e Capitalismo no Brasil (São Paulo: Hucitec/CEBRAP, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luis C. Bresser Pereira, Estado e Subdesenvolvimento Industrializado (São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1977); Tecnoburocracia e Contestação (Petrdpolis: Vozes, 1972); and O Colapso de uma Aliança de Classes (São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carlos E. Martins, Tecnocracia e Capitalismo (São Paulo, Brasiliense/CEBRAP, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alexandre Barros, ‘The Changing Role of the State in Brazil: the technocratic military alliance’, paper, Georgia, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barry C. Ames, ‘Bureaucratic Policy Making in a Militarized Regime: Brazil after 1964’ (Stanford University Ph.D. thesis, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. For details see R Schneider, The Political System of Brazil, and S. Velasco e Cruz and C. Estevão Martins, ‘De Castelo a Figueiredo: Uma Incursão na Pré-História da Abertura’, in B. Sorj and M. H. Tavares de Almeida (eds), Sociedade e Politica no Brasil pós-64 (São Paulo, Ed. Brasiliense, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quoted in I. M. Magalhdes et al., ‘Cronologia — Segundo e Terceiro Ano do Governo Costa e Silva’, Dados, no. 8, 1971, p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Interview on 7 May 1982. The terms contestação and sistema had a special connotation at that time. Contestação was a much stronger word which meant opposition behaviour beyond the limits tolerated by the regime. Sistema became the current word to name the regime’s strict circle of power in which the military and the technocracy controlled the decision-making process. On the so-called sistema see S. C. Velasco e Cruz and C. E. Martins, ‘De Castelo a Figueiredo’, and C. Lafer, O Sistema Politico Brasileiro (São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Maria D’Alva Gil Kinzo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kinzo, M.D.G. (1988). 1969–74: From Retreat to Rebuilding. In: Legal Opposition Politics under Authoritarian Rule in Brazil. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08790-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics