Abstract
The promulgation of Institutional Act Number 5 inaugurated the third political cycle of the ‘1964 revolution’. It started a period in which the resort to repression in all its dimensions and the exercise of arbitrary powers would reach the highest level ever seen in Brazilian political history. In contrast to earlier Institutional Acts issued by the regime to block and purge the ‘adverse forces of the revolution’, the new Act indicated (by the absence of an expiry date) that the so-called ‘Revolution’ had become permanent. If the AI-1 decreed in 1964 and the AI-2 of 1966 limited the President’s exercise of arbitrary power to a definite period of time, the AI-5 meant that exceptional powers were to be used, not only as a corrective measure but also as a preventive instrument to retain the ‘revolutionary process’ along its course. Thus the AI-5 provided clear indications that from then on the power of the ‘revolution’ was to last until the revolutionary command decided that the country was prepared for a return to democracy. The ‘ideals of the revolution’ would again be recalled to justify repression. As the prologue of the AI-5 restated, the ‘revolutionary process’ aimed at
giving the country a regime which, taking into consideration the requirements of a juridical and political system, would assure an authentic democratic order based on freedom, on the respect for human dignity, on the fight against subversion and ideologies contrary to the traditions of our people, on the fight against corruption, thereby searching for the indispensable means for the economic, financial, political and moral reconstruction of Brazil.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Quoted in C. C. Branco’s article of 6 March 1969, republished in C. C. Branco, Os Militares no Poder, vol. 3 (Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1979), p. 90.
R. Schneider, The Political System of Brazil, p. 291. On the armed struggle actions see João Quartim, Dictatorship and Armed Struggle in Brazil (London: NLB, 1971)
and Fernando Portela, Guerra de guerrilhas no Brasil (São Paulo: Global, 1979).
There is a vast literature about the class nature of the state and on the role of the technocracy. The main works are: Florestan Fernandes, A Revolução Burguesa no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1974)
Octavio Ianni, Estado e Planejamento Economico no Brasil (1930–1970) (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 3rd edn 1979)
Fernando H. Cardoso, O Modelo Politico Brasileiro e outros Ensaios (São Paulo: DIFEL, 1972), and Autoritarismo e Democratização (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 3rd edn, 1975)
Sérgio Abranches, ‘The Divided Leviathan: State and Economic Policy Formation in Authoritarian Brazil’ (Cornell University Ph.D. thesis, 1978)
Peter Evans, Dependent Development: the alliance of Multi-national, State and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979)
Renato Boschi and Eli D. Cerqueira, O Empresariado Nacional e o Estado no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1978)
Carlos E. Martins, Capitalismo de Estado e Modelo Politico no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1977)
Carlos E. Martins (org.), Estado e Capitalismo no Brasil (São Paulo: Hucitec/CEBRAP, 1977)
Luis C. Bresser Pereira, Estado e Subdesenvolvimento Industrializado (São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1977); Tecnoburocracia e Contestação (Petrdpolis: Vozes, 1972); and O Colapso de uma Aliança de Classes (São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1978)
Carlos E. Martins, Tecnocracia e Capitalismo (São Paulo, Brasiliense/CEBRAP, 1974)
Alexandre Barros, ‘The Changing Role of the State in Brazil: the technocratic military alliance’, paper, Georgia, 1976
Barry C. Ames, ‘Bureaucratic Policy Making in a Militarized Regime: Brazil after 1964’ (Stanford University Ph.D. thesis, 1972).
For details see R Schneider, The Political System of Brazil, and S. Velasco e Cruz and C. Estevão Martins, ‘De Castelo a Figueiredo: Uma Incursão na Pré-História da Abertura’, in B. Sorj and M. H. Tavares de Almeida (eds), Sociedade e Politica no Brasil pós-64 (São Paulo, Ed. Brasiliense, 1983).
Quoted in I. M. Magalhdes et al., ‘Cronologia — Segundo e Terceiro Ano do Governo Costa e Silva’, Dados, no. 8, 1971, p. 182.
Interview on 7 May 1982. The terms contestação and sistema had a special connotation at that time. Contestação was a much stronger word which meant opposition behaviour beyond the limits tolerated by the regime. Sistema became the current word to name the regime’s strict circle of power in which the military and the technocracy controlled the decision-making process. On the so-called sistema see S. C. Velasco e Cruz and C. E. Martins, ‘De Castelo a Figueiredo’, and C. Lafer, O Sistema Politico Brasileiro (São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva, 1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Maria D’Alva Gil Kinzo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kinzo, M.D.G. (1988). 1969–74: From Retreat to Rebuilding. In: Legal Opposition Politics under Authoritarian Rule in Brazil. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08790-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08790-7_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08792-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08790-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)