Skip to main content

Abstract

On 28 June 1914 the unpopular heir-apparent to an ancient but unsteady throne was shot dead in a backward provincial capital of the empire he expected some day to inherit. In these inglorious cir cumstances began the final chain of events which prefaced the Great War.1 Archduke Franz Ferdinand was brutally murdered by Serbian- trained nationalists, whose transparent plot gave Austria-Hungary the reason she sought to crush Serbia, drive back Russian ambitions in the Balkans and attempt a consolidation of her tottering and disparate empire. With full German support, she moved, but only very slowly. Revealing before the world what she considered to be the conclusive proofs of Serbian perfidy, on 23 July she issued to Belgrade an ultimatum designed to be a made-to-order causus belli. Acting finally a full month after the terrible event, Austria-Hungary had waited too long in carrying out her plan to wage a punitive war while world opinion was still on her side. She stood virtually alone, except for her constant friend, Germany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See Joachim Remak, Serajevo, The Story of a Political Murder (New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vladamir Dedijer, The Road to Serajevo (New York, 1966), for the place of the assassination in the coming of the World War.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Earl of Oxford and Asquith, Memories and Reflections, 1852–1927, (London, 1928) vol. II, pp. 10,12 and 25–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paul Hayes, The Twentieth Century, 1880–1939 (London, 1970) p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Fritz Fischer, Germany’s Aims in the First World War (New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sir Philip Magnus, Kitchener: Portrait of an Imperialist (London, 1959) pp. 276–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See also George H. Casser, Kitchener: Architect of Victory (London, 1977) pp. 170–77.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lady Violet Bonham Carter, Winston Churchill As I Knew Him (London 1959) p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. J. P. Taylor, English History, 1914–1945 (London, 1965) p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Winston S. Churchill, The World Crisis, 1914–1918, vol. I (London, 1923) p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Viscount Grey of Fallodon, Twenty-Five Years, 1892–1916, vol. II (London, 1925) p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan Crow, A Man of Push and Go: The Life of George Macauley Booth (London, 1965) p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sir George Arthur, The Life of Lord Kitchener, vol. III (London, 1920) p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See John Morton Osborne, The Voluntary Recruiting Movement in Britain, 1914–1916 (New York, 1982) ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See the War Office Regulations for Recruiting for the Regular Army and the Special Reserve (London, 1912).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Kitchener Divisions were numbered 9 to 26, and 30 to 41. Twenty-two of these served their entire wartime duty on the Western Front. See Howard Green, The British Army in the First World War (London, 1968) p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gen. The Rt Hon. Sir Nevil Macready, Annals of an Active Life (London, 1925) vol. I, p. 245. The sole defence among contemporary historians of Kitchener’s decision to raise the New Armies independently is found in Casser, Kitchener, pp. 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Basil W. Williams, Raising and Training the New Armies (London, 1918) p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. B. Dearie, The Labour Cost of the World War to Great Britain, 1914–1918 (London, 1922) p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. The minutes of the various meetings of the main and sub-committees of the PRC are preserved in the British Library, Add. MSS. 54192. See Roy Douglas, ‘Voluntary Enlistment in the First World War and the Work of the Parliamentary Recruiting Committee’, Journal of Modern History, December 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For the pioneering role of advertising professionals in the recruitment campaigns both before and during the War, see Eric Field, Advertising: The Forgotten Years (London, 1959) pp. 27–30. All reactions to the publicity campaign of those who supported enthusiastic pursuit of the War were not positive. See Oliver, Ordeal by Battle, pp. 256–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The Parliamentary Labour Party formed its own recruiting committee, which merged with the PRC in October 1915. Perhaps the most colourful recruiter was Horatio Bottomley, editor and proprietor of the jingoistic John Bull and, for a time, an independent MP. He was the darling of the patriotic working class for most of the War period, and his rallies invariably raised large sums in contributions ‘for the lads’ — which frequently never left Bottomley’s pockets. He later was tried, convicted and imprisoned for fraud. See J. Symons, Horatio Bottomley (London, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Diary entry of 25 August 1914, quoted in Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill (London, 1973) companion vol. III, part 2, p. 54. Charles Hobhouse noted in his diary on the same day: I said a proposal of F.E. Smith to explain, through M.P.’s, the reasons for … the war should be accepted and put into force now. If it caught on K. would get a second 100,000 voluntarily and then we could fall back on conscription. However, the P.M. was determined that only his eloquence and that of Grey could rouse the country to a sense of duty and peril, and that neither could spare time for speeches. Edward David (ed.), Inside Asquith’s Cabinet: From the Diaries of Charles Hobhouse (London, 1977) pp. 184–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Prime Minister’s correspondence with Miss Stanley is revealing both about him and those whom he knew. He kept virtually nothing back from her, and she was a loyal guardian of his secrets. His letters to her have recently been published: see Michael and Eleanor Brock (eds) H. H. Asquith: Letters to Venetia Stanley (Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. See R. J. Q. Adams, Arms and the Wizard (London, 1978) ch. 2, for this committee stage of recognition of the munitions shortage.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. A. S. Hewins, The Apologia of an Imperialist: Forty Years of Empire Policy (London, 1929) vol. II, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See the excerpts ‘copied from an old diary’ of Austen Chamberlain, entry of 14 May 1915, Austen Chamberlain Papers, AC 12/37. See also Sir Charles Petrie, The Life and Letters of the Right Honourable Sir Austen Chamberlain, K.G., P.C., M.P. (London, 1940) vol. II, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reginald Pound and Geoffrey Harmsworth, Northcliffe (London, 1959) p. 475.

    Google Scholar 

  29. This memorandum is printed in Viscount French, 1914 (London, 1919) pp. 358–61.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fisher, having addressed the envelope in his unmistakable hand, mailed an old cutting from the Pall Mall Gazette to Bonar Law stating that ‘Lord Fisher was received in audience of the King and remained there about half an hour’, which the latter received on Saturday 15 May. Lord Beaverbrook, Politicans and the War (London, 1960) pp. 105–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. In this regard, see Gerald Henry Starbuck Jordan, ‘The Politics of Conscription in Britain, 1905–1916’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine, 1974, pp. 85–6; and Hazlehurst, Politi cians at War, pp. 265–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill: The Challenge of War, 1914–1916, vol. III (London, 1971) p. 447.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ian Colvin, Sir Edward Carson (London, 1933) vol. III, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Paul Guinn, British Strategy and Politics, 1914 to 1918 (Oxford, 1965) p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Beatrice Webb’s Diaries, 1912–1924, ed. Margaret I. Cole (London, 1952) pp. 37–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. In this regard, see C. J. Wrigley, David Lloyd George and the British Labour Movement, Peace and War (Hassocks, Sussex, 1976) ch. 8, and Adams, Arms and the Wizard, chs 6 and 7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Humbert Wolfe, Labour Supply and Regulation (London, 1923) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Trevor Wilson, The Political Diaries of C. P. Scott, 1911–1928 (London, 1970) p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  39. The Rt Hon. Christopher Addison, Politics from Within (London, 1924) vol. I, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 R. J. Q. Adams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adams, R.J.Q., Poirier, P.P. (1987). The Lamps Go Out. In: The Conscription Controversy in Great Britain, 1900–18. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08787-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics