Displacement by Technological Progress in the USSR (Social and Educational Problems and their Treatment)

  • Anna-Jutta Pietsch
  • Heinrich Vogel
  • Gertrude Schroeder


The labour force of industrialized nations is subject to a constant process of restructuring. This is true for Western industrialized societies as well as for the Soviet Union. The origins of this process are to be found in two interrelated developments:
  1. (1)

    Technological progress leads to an increase in labour productivity. This means that the same quantity of goods is produced with fewer workers because the output capacity of capital equipment is increased, or certain jobs are no longer needed due to mechanization and automation.

  2. (2)

    The increasing national product brought about mostly by rising labour productivity is, as a rule, not used in the same way as the national product generated in the past. As individual and collective prosperity of the nation increases, the structure of demand for goods and services changes likewise.

Under ideal circumstances, the jobs lost as a result of the two processes described above are compensated by the creation of new jobs in the same or other production units. In most cases, however, this process does not run smoothly. In Western industrialized nations, demand cannot expand fast enough to keep up with the increase in labour productivity.


Labour Force Technical Change Technological Progress Young Worker Labour Shortage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    This rate must not be confused with the potential rate of displacement, deduced for many countries by input-output analysis (e.g. D. M. Gallik et al., ‘The 1972 input-output table and the changing structure of the Soviet economy’, in Soviet Economy in a Time of Change (Washington, DC, 1979) pp. 423–71). These studies indicate the number of workers who would be displaced by technical progress if production remained constant. This figure is compared with manpower needs resulting from the expansion of output calculated for constant technology. However, the difference between the two figures does not correspond to the real amount of displacement, because in reality the two processes are correlated. The increase in labour productivity brought about, e.g., by the introduction of a more productive machine need not result in any displacement at all, if production of the corresponding goods is expanded simultaneously.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    N. A. Aitov, Tekhnicheskii progress i dvizhenie rabochikh kadrov (Moscow, 1972) p. 21.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    T. A. Baranenkova, Vysvobozhdenie rabochei sily i uluchshenie ee ispol’ zovaniia pri sotsialisme (Moscow, 1974) p. 105.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    B. Lutz and F. Weltz, Der zwischenbetriebliche Arbeitsplatzwechsel (Frankfurt Main, 1966) p. 67.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    A. J. Pietsch, in W. Gumpel (ed.), Arbeits-und Sozialpolitik in der Sowjetunion (Munich, 1976) p. 102.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    E. Mueller et al., Technological Advance in an Expanding Economy: its Impact on a Cross Section of the Labour Force (Ann Arbor, 1969) p. 10.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    R. Uffhausen, Die Auswirkungen der demographischen Entwicklung auf das Wirtschaftswachstum und die Effizienz der sektoralen Arbeitskrafte-Allokation in der Sowjetunion (Research paper of Osteuropa-Institut no. 76) (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    M. Sonin, Sotsialisticheskii trud, no. 3 (1977) p. 100.Google Scholar
  9. 25.
    V. Sozinov, Sotsialisticheskii trud, no. 10 (1976) p. 91.Google Scholar
  10. 26.
    V. I. Terebilov, Kommentarii k zakonodatel’stvu o trude (Moscow, 1975) p. 93.Google Scholar
  11. 28.
    Cf. A. I. Stavceva, Pravovye voprosy pereraspredeleniia trudovykh resursov (Moscow, 1974) p. 17.Google Scholar
  12. 29.
    ‘Reallocation plans’ are developed on the basis of plans for the introduction of labour-saving measures into the enterprises and from individual interviews with the workers liable to displacement (cf. B. D. Breev, Methods of Planning Employment in the USSR (Moscow, 1979) pp. 57–9).Google Scholar
  13. 30.
    Already in 1975 the proportion of charges against displacement in the total number of legal cases because of termination of employment before the respective courts was 16.9 per cent (cf. O. Luchterhandt, UN-Menschenrechtskonventionen, Sowjetrecht — Sowjetwirklichkeit (Baden-Baden, 1980) p. 43).Google Scholar
  14. 31.
    A. E. Kotliar and V. V. Trubin, Problemy regulirovaniia pereraspredeleniia rabochei sily (Moscow, 1978) pp. 38–40.Google Scholar
  15. 34.
    P. Stiller, ‘Probleme und Methoden der Arbeitskraftelenkung’ (unpublished manuscript, Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
  16. 35.
    E. Smirnov, Sotsialisticheskii trud, no. 3 (1978) p. 110.Google Scholar
  17. 39.
    J. Delamotte, Shchekino, entreprise sovietique pilote (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
  18. 41.
    For example, R. Blauner, Alienation and Freedom (Chicago/London, 1964);Google Scholar
  19. A. Touraine, L’evolution du travail ouvrieur aux usines Renault (Paris, 1955).Google Scholar
  20. 42.
    H. Kern and M. Schumann, Industriearbeit und Arbeiterbewusstsein (Frankfurt/Main, 1970).Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    For example, S. Ia. Batushev. Sovetskaia pedagogica, no. 8 (1971) pp. 11 et seq.;Google Scholar
  22. W. N. Turtshenko, Sowjetwissenschaft, Gesellschaftswissen-schaftliche Beitrage, no. 8 (1973) pp. 11 et seq.;Google Scholar
  23. M. N. Rutkevich and F. P. Filippov, Sotsial’ naia struktura razvitogo sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva v SSSR (Moscow, 1970).Google Scholar
  24. 46.
    H. Wiegmann, Die Entwicklung der sowjetischen Berufsstruktur, Research paper of the Osteuropa-Instituta, Munchen (1975).Google Scholar
  25. 50.
    Cf. e.g. G. M. Safranov, Trudovye reservy (Kisinev, 1972) p. 56.Google Scholar
  26. 51.
    M. Baethge et al., Produktion und Qualifikation (Hannover, 1976) p. 112.Google Scholar
  27. 52.
    V. A. Jadov, in M. Yanowitch (ed.), Soviet Work Attitudes (New York, 1979) p. 8.Google Scholar
  28. 53.
    V. G. Aseev, Preodelenie monotonnosti truda v promysh’lennosti (Moscow, 1974) p. 7.Google Scholar
  29. 56.
    M. Feshbach, ‘The structure and composition of the Soviet industrial labour force’, The USSR in the 1980’s (Brussels, NATO, 1978) p. 59.Google Scholar
  30. 57.
    A.-J. Pietsch, Die Interdependenz von Qualifikarionsbedarf und Arbeitsorganisation, Research paper for Osteurope-Institut, Munchen, no. 63 (1980).Google Scholar
  31. 58.
    Studies carried out in Leningrad have already shown that graduates of intermediate vocational schools in jobs that are not commensurate with their qualifications have a poorer performance record than the less highly qualified graduates from the traditional type of vocationaltechnical schools (cf. O. O. Shkaratan, O. V. Stakanova and O. V. Filipovna, Sotsiologicheskie isledovaniia, no. 4 (1977) pp. 39 et seq.).Google Scholar
  32. 59.
    Cf. M. Tatur, in Leviathan, no. 3 (1979)Google Scholar
  33. 60.
    Cf. M. Tatur, ‘Vergleich der Politiken zur Modernisierung der Arbeitsorganisation in der UdSSR, Polen und der CSSR’ (unpublished manuscript, 1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jan Adam 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna-Jutta Pietsch
  • Heinrich Vogel
  • Gertrude Schroeder

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations