Abstract
‘Capacity utilisation’, ‘capital utilisation’ (or whatever) is a decision by a firm to operate at different levels of activity. Questions about utilisation thus become questions about how firms or industries operate. This was recognised by Winston and McCoy (1974), who considered optimal idleness in a model in which the cost of labour varied over the 24 hours of a day. These changes in wage rates produced a rhythm which will be reflected in when machines are used. In their model, machines are homogeneous and output and labour combine through a neo-classical production function to determine the output level. So in order to produce a given output per day it is possible to vary the capital—labour ratio across the day whilst installing sufficient machines to generate the desired output overall.
The work is financed by a grant from the Department of Energy for a study on Demand for Energy by United Kingdom Manufacturing. We are grateful for their support. They should not be held responsible or seen as agreeing with the methods and views contained in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BEENSTOCK, M., DALZIEL, A. and WARBURTON, P. (1984) ‘Aggregate Investment and Output in the UK’, Recherches Economiques de Louvain. 50.
BERNDT, E. and WOOD, D. (1975) ‘Technology, Prices and the Derived Demand for Energy’, Review of Economics and Statistics. 57.
FUSS, M. (1977) ‘The Structure of Technology Over Time’, Econometrica., 45.
GRIFFIN, J. and GREGORY, P. (1976) ‘An Intercountry Translog Model of Energy Substitution Responses’, American Economic Review. 66.
HAUSMAN, J. (1973) ‘Theoretical and empirical aspects of vintage capital models’, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University, unpublished.
INGHAM, A. (1984) ‘Comment on Aggregate Investment and Output in the UK’, Recherches Economiques de Louvain. 50.
INGHAM, A. WEISERBS, D. and MELESE, F. (1982) ‘Unemployment Equilibria in a Small Resource Importing Economy with a Vintage Production Structure’, in Eichorn, W. et al.. (eds) Economic Theory of Natural Resources. (Wurzburg: Physica Verlag).
JOHANSEN, L. (1972) Production Functions. (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
MALCOMSON, J. and PRIOR, M. (1979) ‘The Estimation of a Vintage Model of Production for UK Manufacturing’, Review of Economic Studies. 46.
MIZON, G. E. (1974) ‘The estimation of non-linear econometric equations: an application to the specification and estimation of an aggregate putty clay relation for the UK’ Review of Economic Studies., XLI.
MIZON, G. E. and NICKELL, S. T. (1983) ‘Vintage models of UK manufacturing industry’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 85.
SALTER, W. (1966) Productivity and Technical Change. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
WINSTON, G. and McCOY, T. (1974) ‘Investment and the Optimal Idleness of Capital’, Review of Economic Studies. XLI (3).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 Derek Bosworth and David F. Heathfield
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ansar, J., Ingham, A., Leon, H., Toker, M., Ulph, A. (1987). Capacity Utilisation in a Vintage Model of United Kingdom Manufacturing. In: Bosworth, D., Heathfield, D.F. (eds) Working Below Capacity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08649-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08649-8_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08651-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08649-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)