Skip to main content

Capital Theory Paradoxes: Anything Goes

  • Chapter
Joan Robinson and Modern Economic Theory

Abstract

A first approximation to the study of the intertemporal aspects of resource allocation (capital theory from now on), consists of concentrating on the steady states (the rest points) of associated dynamical systems. Provided one does not lose sight from the fact that this is not an end in itself, there is much useful information to be gleaned from steady-state analysis — indeed, one of the prime tools of economics. No doubt, the pervasiveness of the notion of the stationary state in classical economics and the fact that there is so much one can do without invoking powerful mathematics, have also added to its popularity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. and F. Hahn (1971) General Competitive Analysis (San Francisco: Holden-Day).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C. (1975) Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, E. (1980) Capital Theory and Dynamics (Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D. (1973) ‘On the Theory of Interest’, American Mathematical Monthly, 80: 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G. C. (1972) Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1953) ‘Capital Accumulation and Efficient Allocation of Resources’, Econometrica, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. von (1945–6) ‘A Model of General Economic Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1953–4) ‘The Production Functions and the Theory of Capital’, Reviewof Economic Studies, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. and H. Sonnenschein (1982) ‘Market Demand and Excess Demand Functions’, ch.14 in Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. II, K. Arrow and M. Intriligator (eds) (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, C. C. von (1971) Steady State Capital Theory (New York: Springer-Verlag).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 George R. Feiwel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mas-Colell, A. (1989). Capital Theory Paradoxes: Anything Goes. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Joan Robinson and Modern Economic Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08633-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics