The ABM Treaty — its Evolution, Interpretation and Grey Areas, and an Official Attempt at Reinterpretation

  • John B. Rhinelander


This chapter draws on the experience of the author as the legal advisor of the American SALT I delegation from 1971 to 1972. The official United States SALT I negotiating record is massive but still classified. The author has not had access to it since 1972 and he has never seen the official ACDA history of SALT I, which is also classified. This chapter is consistent with a chapter the author wrote in 1973 which has until recently been the standard unclassified reference in government on the interpretation of the ABM Treaty.2 In analysing the most recent efforts of the Reagan Administration to reinterpret the ABM Treaty this chapter employs statements the author made before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 12 November 1985 and responses the author made on 11 January 1986 to written questions submitted to him by the House Foreign Affairs Committee.3


Agree Statement Ballistic Missile Article Versus United States Government Printing Strategic Defense Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    John B. Rhinelander, ‘The SALT I Agreements’, in Mason Willrich and John B. Rhinelander eds, SALT The Moscow Agreements and Beyond (New York: The Free Press: 1974) pp. 125–59.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Gerard Smith, Doubletalk — The Story of the First Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (New York: Doubleday, 1980);Google Scholar
  3. John Newhouse, Cold Dawn. The Story of SALT (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973);Google Scholar
  4. Raymond L. Garthoff, Détente and Confrontation — American-Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1985).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Thomas W. Wolfe, The SALT Experience (Cambridge: Ballinger, 1979);Google Scholar
  6. Strobe Talbot, Endgame. The Inside Story of SALT II (New York: Knopf, 1979).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hans-Henrik Holm and Nikolaj Petersen (eds), The European Missiles Crisis. Nuclear Weapons and Security Policy (London: Frances Pinter, 1983).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    For details see Raymond L. Garthoff, ‘BMD and East-West Relations’, in Ashton B. Carter and David N. Schwartz (eds), Ballistic Missile Defense (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1984) pp. 275–329.Google Scholar
  9. 35.
    Paul B. Stares, Space Weapons & US Strategy: Origins and Developments (London: Croom Helm, 1985).Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    Keith Payne, ‘Introduction and Overview of Policy Issues’, in Keith B. Payne (ed.), Laser Weapons in Space, Policy and Doctrine (Boulder, Co.: Westview Press, 1983) pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
  11. 38.
    Hans Günter Brauch, Antitactical Missile Defense — Will the European Version of SDI Undermine the ABM-Treaty? AFES Papier 1, (Stuttgart: AG Friedensforschung und Europäische Sicherheitspolitik, Institut für Politikwissenschaft, July 1985).Google Scholar
  12. 41.
    Fred S. Hoffman, Ballistic Missile Defenses and US National Security. Summary Report. Prepared for the Future Security Strategy Study (FSSS), (Washington, DC: Department of Defense, October 1983) p. 2.Google Scholar
  13. 45.
    US Department of Defense, Defense against Ballistic Missiles: An Assessment of Technologies and Policy Implications (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, April 1984).Google Scholar
  14. 46.
    US Department of Defense, Strategic Defense Initiative — Defense Technologies Study (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, March 1984).Google Scholar
  15. 47.
    Caspar Weinberger, as reported in ABC’s ‘This Week with David Brinkley’ (Washington, DC: ABC, 8 April 1984).Google Scholar
  16. 50.
    Richard Perle, as quoted in US Congress, Senate, Armed Services Committee, Hearings, Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriation for Fiscal Year 1983, part 7, (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1982) p. 5001.Google Scholar
  17. 59.
    Department of State, ‘Analysis of US Post-Negotiation Public Statements Interpreting the ABM Treaty’s Application of Future Systems’ (Washington, DC: Department of State, 29 October 1985. This document will be quoted as State analysis in the subsequent text with the pages given in brackets.Google Scholar
  18. 90.
    Committee of Soviet Scientists for Peace Against the Nuclear Threat, Space-Strike Arms and International Security (Moscow: Novosti, October 1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hans Günter Brauch 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • John B. Rhinelander

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations