Abstract
Like Death of a Salesman, The Crucible aspires to tragedy, Frank Granville Barker remarks on its atmosphere of‘tragic horror’and its ‘Hellenic inevitability’ (Plays and Players, May 1954). Bernard Levin puns on Aristotle’s Poetics: it ‘tells with terror and pitilessness the story of one of the most terrible and pitiless aberrations mankind has ever suffered’ (Daily Mail, 20 Jan. 1965). To John Gassner, Proctor has greater tragic stature than Willy Loman, and his death ‘is on an obviously higher level of tragic sacrifice than Willy’s suicide’ (in Ferres). Even John Simon, who repeatedly savages Death of a Salesman, applauds the later play, accepting as psychologically and dramatically valid the relationship between Proctor’s self-recognised guilt in ‘a minor, expiated transgression’ and his innocence in ‘a major, social context’, the former making him vulnerable to attacks concerning the latter, and he calls Proctor ‘both an Aristotelian hero complete with hamartia and a Freudian hero made incomplete by a nagging sense of guilt’ (New York, 15 May 1972).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1989 Bernard F. Dukore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dukore, B.F. (1989). Tragedy?. In: Death of a Salesman and The Crucible. Text and Performance. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08599-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08599-6_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08601-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08599-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)