Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Text and Performance ((TEPE))

  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

Like Death of a Salesman, The Crucible aspires to tragedy, Frank Granville Barker remarks on its atmosphere of‘tragic horror’and its ‘Hellenic inevitability’ (Plays and Players, May 1954). Bernard Levin puns on Aristotle’s Poetics: it ‘tells with terror and pitilessness the story of one of the most terrible and pitiless aberrations mankind has ever suffered’ (Daily Mail, 20 Jan. 1965). To John Gassner, Proctor has greater tragic stature than Willy Loman, and his death ‘is on an obviously higher level of tragic sacrifice than Willy’s suicide’ (in Ferres). Even John Simon, who repeatedly savages Death of a Salesman, applauds the later play, accepting as psychologically and dramatically valid the relationship between Proctor’s self-recognised guilt in ‘a minor, expiated transgression’ and his innocence in ‘a major, social context’, the former making him vulnerable to attacks concerning the latter, and he calls Proctor ‘both an Aristotelian hero complete with hamartia and a Freudian hero made incomplete by a nagging sense of guilt’ (New York, 15 May 1972).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Bernard F. Dukore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dukore, B.F. (1989). Tragedy?. In: Death of a Salesman and The Crucible. Text and Performance. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08599-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics