Skip to main content

The Union Militant: Roots of Union Activism

  • Chapter
  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

In beginning this analysis of CGT and CFDT militants I make an explicit assumption: to paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald’s famous saying about the rich, French union militants are different from the mass of workers and union rank-and-file members. They are different primarily in that they spend many hours in organisational activities that often will block, if not harm, their advancement as workers. Militants pass much of that time confronting management with workers’ problems and complaints. They do so reimbursed only for a specified number of work hours lost, and in many instances work beyond their ‘delegated’ hours, receiving no compensation at all. Theirs is not a life of glory, praise and comfort. What motivates them?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Stephen Bornstein, ‘From Social Christianity to Left Socialism: The Itinerary of the Catholic Labor Movement in France, 1930–1978’. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1979) p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dominique Labbé, ‘Le Discours CGT’, Que Faire Aujourd’hui, 19 (May 1982) p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Compare these figures to those of a national sample of workers questioned in 1969. Whereas none of the CGT members had ever been a member of the CFDT, 26 per cent of CFDT members had previously belonged to the CGT. See Gérard Adam et al., L’Ouvrier français en 1970 (Paris: Armand Colin, 1970) p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  4. George Ross, Workers and Communists in France (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1982) pp. 243–79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, ‘Revolutionary Trade Unionism in France: Goals and Constraints in the French Democratic Confederation of Labor in Grenoble’ (University of Michigan, 1975) pp. 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. William Spinrad, ‘Correlates of Trade Union Participation: A Summary of the Literature’, American Sociological Review, 25:2 (Apr 1960) p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patricia Fosh, The Active Trade Unionist (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981) pp. 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a good summary of this approach, see Arnold S. Tannenbaum, ‘Unions’ in James G. March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965), esp. pp. 746–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arnold S. Tannenbaum and Robert L. Kahn, Participation in Union Locals (Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson & Co., 1958) p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tannenbaum, op. cit. pp. 746–7. For other studies that support this position see Lois R. Dean, ‘Union Activity and Dual Loyalty’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 7 (July 1954) pp. 526–36;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eugene C. Hagburg, ‘Correlates of Organizational Participation: An Examination of Factors Affecting Union Membership Activity’, Pacific Sociological Review, 9 (Spring 1966) pp. 15–21;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin M. Perline and V. R. Lorenz, ‘Factors Influencing Member Participation in Trade Union Activities’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 29 (1970) pp. 425–38;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregory E. Huszczo, ‘Attitudinal and Behavioral Variables Related to Participation in Union Activities’, Journal of Labor Research, 4:3 (Summer 1983) pp. 289–97. See also the numerous studies reported in Fosh, op. cit., and Tannenbaum, op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michael Mann, Consciousness and Action among the Western Working Class (London: Macmillan, 1973) p. 36.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. The gamma statistic is an ordinal measure of relationships, varying between — 1.0 and 1.0. See William L. Hays, Statistics (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963) pp. 655–6. Union participation is measured by the number of hours per month spent on union activity, as reported by each respondent. These figures were collapsed into five categories: 1. 10–15 hours; 2. 16–25; 3. 26–35; 4. 36–50; 5. More than 50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 W. Rand Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, W.R. (1987). The Union Militant: Roots of Union Activism. In: Crisis in the French Labour Movement. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08556-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics