Skip to main content

Abstract

New developments in science and technology very often have a profound impact on society. Especially in our age, in which the systematic use of scientific knowledge for societal objectives has become an organised endeavour, a pervasive influence of science and technology in many areas and aspects of life, has come about. This holds very definitively for the domain of peace and security: scientific developments and related new military technologies induced fundamental changes in military doctrines and in the nature of international relations. The development of ‘deterrence’ and ‘flexible response’ and of a superpower dominated bipolar world1 can rightly be associated with the development of nuclear weapons and other military technology. Recently emerging military technologies tend to give rise to new adaptations in military doctrine and postures, and by consequence also to evoke changes in East-West relations2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See D. Senghaas, Abschreckung und Frieden: Studien zur Kritik organisierter Friedlosigkeit, Europäische Verlaganstalt, Frankfurt am Main, 3rd ed., 1981, for a theoretical analysis of the impact of deterrence on international relations and its relation with the introduction of weapons of mass destruction.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See also Donald R. Cotter, ‘Potential Future Roles for Conventional and Nuclear Forces in Defense of Western Europe’, supporting paper in ESECS: Strengthening Conventional Deterrence in Europe (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983) pp. 209–53.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See e.g. Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman (eds), The Social Shaping of Technology: (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1985) especially part iv, pp. 223–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Hans Günter Brauch and Lutz Unterseher, ‘Getting Rid of Nuclear Weapons: a Review of a Few Proposals for a Conventional Defense of Europe’, Journal of Peace Research, 21 (2), 1984, pp. 193–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See also Donald R. Cotter, ‘Potential Future Roles for Conventional and Nuclear Forces in Defense of Western Europe’, supporting paper in ESECS: Strengthening Conventional Deterrence in Europe (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983) pp. 209–53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See e.g. K. E. Weick: The Social Psychology of Organising (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 2nd ed., 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See also F. B. van der Meer, Organisatie als spel (The game of organising), Twente University of Technology, 1983. Within sociology the approach of Norbert Elias seems potentially very fruitful.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See e.g. Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman (eds), The Social Shaping of Technology: (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1985) especially part iv, pp. 223–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. Hans Günter Brauch and Lutz Unterseher, ‘Getting Rid of Nuclear Weapons: a Review of a Few Proposals for a Conventional Defense of Europe’, Journal of Peace Research, 21 (2), 1984, pp. 193–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1986 Frank Barnaby and Marlies ter Borg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boskma, P., van der Meer, FB. (1986). Trends in Military Technology. In: Barnaby, F., ter Borg, M. (eds) Emerging Technologies and Military Doctrine. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08505-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics