Advertisement

Joint Decision-Making Processes in Present-Day Agriculture

  • Sidney Hoos
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

The architects of the Conference have assigned to me a broad subject, but with constraints of time and space. Within such limitations, I sketch a limited number of market-structure situations in which joint decision-making processes prevail in present-day agriculture. They apply to the United States, although they are not limited to it; broadly similar joint decision-making processes operate in other countries. A caveat is that my experience and views are flavoured, likely biased, by my observation and study of developments in my own country.

Keywords

Bargaining Power Market Structure Vertical Integration Monopoly Power Target Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Dale E. Hathaway, Government and Agriculture, New York, Macmillan Co., 1963, p. 412.Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    Sidney Hoos, ‘Cooperative Canneries’, California Agriculture, Vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. 1960, pp. 4 and 6.Google Scholar
  3. 1.
    Michel Labonne, ‘Prix et contrats de production en agriculture’, Économie rurale, Vol. 61, July–Sept., 1964, pp. 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 1.
    M. R. Benedict and O. C. Stine, The Agricultural Commodity Programs: Two Decades of Experience, New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1956, p. 510.Google Scholar
  5. 1.
    R. A. Gordon, Business Leadership in the Large Corporation, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1945, p. 369.Google Scholar
  6. 2.
    A. P. Lerner, ‘The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power’, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. i, No. 3, June 1934, pp. 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Joe S. Bain, ‘The Profit Rate as a Measure of Monopoly Power’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 55, No. 2, Feb. 1941, pp. 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 1.
    John T. Dunlop and Benjamin Higgins, ‘Bargaining Power and Market Structures’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 50, No. 1, Feb., 1942, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 3.
    R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1957, p. 509.Google Scholar
  10. H. A. Simon, ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economic and Behavioral Science’, American Economic Review, Vol. xlix, No. 3, June 1959, pp. 253–283.Google Scholar
  11. Robert L. Bishop, ‘Game-Theoretic Analyses of Bargaining’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 77, No. 4, Nov., 1963, pp. 559–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sidney Hoos
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations