Abstract
Professor Lindahl introduced the paper by saying that it aimed to re-incorporate into modern, model-building capital theory some elements from the older classical theory. Professor Lutz had said in his paper, ‘What we require are growth models based on something like the old production function which took care of these flexibilities. It is a sign that this feeling is shared by others that some recent model-builders seem to be moving back in this direction.’ 1 Professor Lindahl sympathized with this approach. He thought it was very useful to study some parts of capital theory in a more simplified manner — as the classical economists had done — for that would clear up some of the controversy in modern discussions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Fisher ‘A Twin Dimensional Representation …’ Econometrica, October 1939.
J. Marchal et J. Lécaillon, La Répartition du revenu national (Paris, 1958), p. 291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1961 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hague, D.C. (1961). SUMMARY RECORD OF THE DEBATE. In: Hague, D.C. (eds) The Theory of Capital. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08452-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08452-4_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08454-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08452-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)