Skip to main content

British Military Intelligence Following World War I

  • Chapter
Book cover British and American Approaches to Intelligence

Part of the book series: RUSI Defence Studies ((RUSIDS))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to examine the military dimension of British intelligence in the aftermath of World War I and to draw out a number of general observations concerning the practice of intelligence.1 After a survey of the structure and scope of military intelligence during the period in question, three case-studies are taken to illustrate different aspects of the topic. The first deals with senior war office involvement in and reaction to specific political intelligence-gathering: the intercept operation against the Russian Trade Delegation in 1920. The second looks at a local military intelligence operation — so far as the evidence allows — and assesses the influence (if any) exerted on British policy by intelligence collected in Constantinople. The third case-study investigates the military role in domestic intelligence work — both in Great Britain and Ireland. Finally, military intelligence during the 1920s is briefly examined in terms of the specific functions of collection, analysis, counter-intelligence and covert action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. F. S. G. Piggott, Broken Thread (Aldershot, 1950) p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. H. Hinsley et al., British Intelligence in the Second World War, vol. I (London, 1979) p. 14, wrongly states that the Intelligence Corps was abolished in 1918. It would be more correct to say that it faded away (suitably) after the war. Elements of the Corps survived 1918. Isaac, ‘History’, p. 24, notes an Intelligence Corps at Constantinople represented in the January 1922 Monthly Army List.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. C. Temperley, The Whispering Gallery of Europe (London, 1938) p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lord Ironside (ed.), High Road to Command: the Diaries of Major General Sir Edmund Ironside 1920–22 (London, 1972) p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christopher Andrew ‘The British Secret Service and Anglo-Soviet Relations in the 1920s Part I: From the Trade Negotiations to the Zinoviev Letter’, The Historical Journal, vol. 20, no. 3 (1977) p. 683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. This subject is dealt with extensively in Keith Jeffery and Peter Hennessy, States of Emergency: British Governments and Strikebreaking since 1919 (London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. The best account of the negotiations is in Richard H. Ullman, Anglo-Soviet Relations, 1917–1921, III: the Anglo-Soviet Accord, (Princeton University Press, 1972) passim.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Churchill to Thwaites, 20 August 1920, Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill, vol. IV, Companion, part 2, (London, 1977) p. 1175.

    Google Scholar 

  9. This divergence in military and political opinion is discussed in Keith Jeffery, The British Army and the Crisis of Empire 1918–1922, (Manchester, 1984) pp. 40–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This topic is covered in Keith Jeffery, ‘The British Army and Internal Security, 1919–39’ The Historical Journal, vol. 24, no. 2 (1981) pp. 377–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The best account of security policy in Ireland during this period is Charles Townshend, The British Campaign in Ireland 1919–1921 (Oxford, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Eunan O’Halpin, ‘British Intelligence in Ireland, 1914–1921’, in Christopher Andrew and David Dilks (eds), The Missing Dimension: Governments and Intelligence Communities in the Twentieth Century (London, 1984) pp. 54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sir Tom Bridges, Alarms and Excursions, (London, 1938) pp. 203, 207.

    Google Scholar 

  14. William Y. Darling, So It Looks to Me (London, 1953) p. 280.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For the Irish Bulletin affair, and the propaganda war generally see D. G. Boyce, Englishmen and Irish Troubles: British Public Opinion and the Making of Irish Policy 1918–22 (London, 1972) pp. 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See also C. J. C. Street, Ireland in 1921 (London, 1922) p. 303, and Winters Tale, pp. 307–8, where Winter names Darling as responsible for the bogus Bulletin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, for example, David Neligan, The Spy in the Castle (London, 1968), and

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leon O Broin, ‘Dave Neligan, “The Spy in the Castle”’, The Irish Sword, vol. XV, no. 61 (1983) pp. 271–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. These elements are as developed by Roy Godson, especially in his (editor), Intelligence Requirements for the 1980s: Elements of Intelligence (Washington DC, rev. edn 1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 Royal United Services Institute

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jeffery, K. (1987). British Military Intelligence Following World War I. In: Robertson, K.G. (eds) British and American Approaches to Intelligence. RUSI Defence Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08418-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics