The Postwar UNESCO Debate on Regulation of Education

  • Clare Wells

Abstract

As was shown in Chapter 3, promotion of international understanding as a means to peace, and the improvement of education to that end, were regarded by UNESCO’s founders as central to the new Agency’s tasks; and ‘education for international understanding’ was in fact to serve as the guiding framework for a number of UNESCO-wide projects.

Keywords

Europe Assure Egypt Dispatch Ecuador 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    For attendance records, see UNESCO 1 C/Proceedings, pp. 7–10; 2 C/Proceedings, pp. 7–12; 3 C/Proceedings, pp. 7–12; 4 C/Proceedings, pp. 9–14; 5 C/Proceedings, pp. 9–15; and 6 C/Proceedings, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.g. Armstrong, ‘The Soviet Attitude toward UNESCO’ and Dexter ‘Yardstick for UNESCO’, op. cit.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    For elections to the Executive Board for the first term and debate thereon, see UNESCO 1 C/Proceedings, pp. 66–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    UNESCO 2 C/Proceedings, pp. 347 and 483.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doc. ECO/CONF./29 (1946) p. 50.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid., p.60.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid., pp.31 and 103–4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doc. UNESCO/Prep.Comm./5th sess./PV 7(1) (7 July 1946) p. 4.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ‘CAME proposals’ in Doc. ECO/CONF./29 (1946) p. 1, Art. II, paras. 3–4.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    See ‘French proposals’ in Doc. ECO/CONF./29 (1946) p. 6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doc. ECO/CONF./29, p. 100.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doc. ECO/CONF./Com.I/18 in Doc. ECO/CONF./29, pp. 107–8; and summary of meeting, Doc. ECO/CONF./29, p. 101.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Compare ‘CAME proposals’ op. cit. (no explicit mention of domestic jurisdiction) and ‘French proposals’ op. cit., Art. 1 para. 2, with UNESCO Constitution, op. cit., Art. I para. 3.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    UNESCO 1 C/Proceedings, p. 152.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibid., and p. 55Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid., p. 152Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    UNESCO 2 C/Proceedings, pp. 59, 110 and 438–4; 3 C/Proceedings, pp. 249, 254 and 311–16; and 4 C/Proceedings, esp. p. 275.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    UNESCO 1 C/Proceedings, p. 152.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    See Shuster, UNESCO: Assessment and Promise, op. cit., pp. 71–2.1 am grateful to Mr Behrstock, former US official of UNESCO, for insights on this point.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    See exchange of letters between Senator Benton and Luther Evans, cited in Laves & Thomson, UNESCO: Purpose, Progress, Prospects, op. cit., p.230.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    UNESCO 1 C/Proceedings, p. 152.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid., p. 153.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    UNESCO 1 C/Proceedings p. 224: Annex I, Section III, para. 3.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibid., Section III, para. 9.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ibid., p.221.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    E.g. UNESCO 2 C/Proceedings, pp. 60, 84, 89–90 and 103; and 4 C/Proceedings, p. 64.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    See UNESCO 1 C/Proceedings, pp. 271–2.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    UNESCO 5 C/Proceedings, esp. 350; and 6 C/Proceedings, p. 284.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    UNESCO 3 C/Res. 2.3 of 11 December 1948 (UNESCO 3 C/Resolutions at 18) and 4 C/Res. 2.3 of 5 October 1949 (UNESCO 4 C/Resolutions at 15).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    UNESCO 6 C/Res. 1.316 of 10 July 1951 (UNESCO 6 C/Resolutions at 20).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    UNESCO 7 C/Res. 1.331 of 11 December 1952 (UNESCO 7 C/Resolutions at 20).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Handbook for the Improvement of Textbooks and Teaching Materials (Paris: UNESCO, Publication No. 368, 1949).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    UNESCO Doc. 4 C/3 (1949) p. 36.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    UNESCO 5 C/Res. 1.324 of 17 June 1950 (UNESCO 5 C/Resolutions) and 6 C/Res. 1.315 of 10 July 1951 (UNESCO 6 C/Resolutions at 20).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    See e.g. UNESCO series Towards World Understanding (1949–52);Google Scholar
  38. and Cyril Bibby, Race, Prejudice and Education (Paris: UNESCO, 1959).Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    UNESCO Doc. 2 C/102 (13 November 1947).Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    Ibid., p. 2, last paragraph.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    UNESCO 2 C/Proceedings, pp. 483–4.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    UNESCO Doc. 2 C/109 (19 November 1947).Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    Ibid., para. 1 ; and UNESCO 2 C/Res. 3.13 (UNESCO 2 C/Resolutions at 21). For debates see UNESCO 2 C/Proceedings, pp. 483–5.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    UNESCO Doc. EX/4CP/SR.3 (27 April 1948) pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
  46. 45.
    UNESCO 3 C/Res. 2.514 of 11 December 1948 (UNESCO 3 C/Resolutions at 19).Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    See Memo. IU/105 of 19 May 1949 from C. E. Beeby to Director-General, UNESCO C.R. File 327.6.371.214A 182/064 (44) “49”.Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    UNESCO Docs. 4 C/5 (1949) and 4 C/Res. 2.513 of 5 October 1949 (UNESCO 4 C/Resolutions at 16).Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    For Minutes of the meeting, see UNESCO Doc. 19 EX/12 (1950).Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    Ibid., p. 2.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    Ibid., pp. 6–7, Section XI.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    For text, ibid., pp. 8–12.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    See letter ED 136.632 of 3 January 1950 from W. Laves to I. Kabbany Bey, Chairman of the expert meeting, UNESCO C.R. File cited in note 46 above.Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    See revised text in UNESCO Doc. 6 C/PRG/6 (1951) Part I, paras 1–2.Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    UNESCO Docs. 19 EX/SR.24 (25 February 1950) p. 9, and 19 EX/Dec. 5(g) (i) of same date.Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    For text of replies, see UNESCO Doc. 6 C/PRG/6 (1951).Google Scholar
  57. 56.
  58. 57.
    Ibid., p.3.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    Letter ref. U.N.7 (7)/11 of 7 October 1949 from UK National Commission for UNESCO to the Director-General, in UNESCO File cited in note 46 above.Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    On this point see Thomas Buergenthal and Judith Torney, International Human Rights and International Education (Washington, D.C.: Dept of State, 1976), ch. 5.Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    UNESCO Doc. 6. C/PRG/6 (1951) p. 7, last para. For debate in Programme Committee of the Executive Board, see UNESCO Doc. 25 EX/CP/SR.1 and 2 (19–20 January 1951).Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    UNESCO Doc. 6 C/1/Rev. Annex I (1951) p. 4: item 8.7.1.3.Google Scholar
  63. 62.
    UNESCO 6 C/Proceedings, p. 284 paras 9–11.1 am grateful to Mr Guiton, former official of the UNESCO Education Sector, for information provided during interview in November 1978.Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    For relevant UNESCO file, see note 46 above.Google Scholar
  65. 64.
    See UNESCO Doc. Cons.Exec./S.R.6 (9 December 1946) p. 7.Google Scholar
  66. 65.
    E.g. John Gimbel, A German Community under American Occupation (Stanford University Press, 1961) ch.13;Google Scholar
  67. and Harold Zink, The US in Germany, 1944–1945 (Princeton, N.J.: van Nostrand, 1957) ch.13.Google Scholar
  68. 66.
    See UNESCO Docs. 6 EX/19 (1948) and 6 EX/SR.8 rev. (15 February 1948) pp. 2–6; 7 EX/5 (1948) and 7 EX/SR.2 to 4 rev. (2–4 April 1948); 10 EX/SR.2 prov. (14 September 1948) pp. 2–15; EX/5CP/SR.1 and 2 (16 September 1948) pp. 4–7 and 1–17 resp.; 11 EX/14 (1948) and 11 EX/SR.2 and 3 rev. (13–14 October 1948) pp. 3–7 and 2–18 resp. ; and 16 EX/SR.11 rev. (15 June 1949) pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  69. 67.
    See UNESCO Docs. 2 C/87 and 2 C/104 and Annex (1947); 2 C/Proceedings, pp. 171–6, 193–6 and 599–600; 3 C/Proceedings, pp. 415–6; and 4 C/Proceedings, pp. 185–201 and 413–8.Google Scholar
  70. 68.
    E.g. Records of the UNESCO Preparatory Commission, Education Committee, meetings of 24–5 May 1946, pp. 21 and 25 and pp. 3–4 resp; UNESCO Docs. 2 C/C2/9 (1947); 2 C/Proceedings, p. 599; 6 EX/SR.8 rev. (1948) statement by Mr Stoddard, p. 3; and 7 EX/SR.2 rev. (1948), statements by Messrs Hardman & Holland, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  71. 69.
    UNESCO 2 C/Proceedings, p. 599; and Docs. 6 EX/SR.8 rev (1948) p. 2 and 16 EX/SR.11 rev. (1949), statement by Mr Birecki (Poland) p. 5.Google Scholar
  72. 70.
    UNESCO Doc. 6 EX/SR.8 rev. (1948), statements by Messrs Birecki (Poland) and Opocensky (Czechoslovakia), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  73. 71.
    E.g. UNESCO 2 C/Proceedings, statement by Czechoslovakia, p. 196; 4 C/Proceedings, pp. 413–7; and UNESCO Docs. 7 EX/SR.2 & 4 rev. (1948), statements by Mr Birecki (Poland), pp. 4–6 and p. 4 resp.; EX/4CP/SR.4 (27 April 1948), statement by Mr Birecki, p. 15; 11 EX/SR.3 rev. (1948) statement by Prof. Arnold (Poland), p. 3; EX/5CP/SR.1 rev. (1948), statement by Mr Birecki, pp. 5–6; and 16 EX/23 (1949) Ann. III, statement by Mr Mencel (Poland), pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  74. 72.
    Laves & Thomson, UNESCO: Purpose, Progress, Prospects, op. cit., p.237.Google Scholar
  75. 73.
    See UNESCO 2 C/Proceedings, p. 599; and UNESCO Docs. 6 EX/SR.8 rev. (1948), statements by Messrs Stoddard, Cowell and Seydoux, p. 3, and by Director-General, p. 4; 7 EX/SR.2 rev. (1948), statements by Messrs Laves, Hardman, Holland and Huxley, pp. 2–3, 7–8 and 9–10; 11 EX/SR.2 rev. (1948), statement by Sir John Maud, p. 5 and 16 EX/SR.11 rev. (1948) statement by Mr de Blonay, p. 6.Google Scholar
  76. 74.
    See UNESCO Docs 9 EX/13 (1948) and 10 EX/SR.2 (prov.) (14 September 1948).Google Scholar
  77. 75.
    See UNESCO Doc. 11 EX/15 (1948) p. 5.Google Scholar
  78. 76.
    For programme resolutions, see UNESCO Docs 2 C/Res. IX. Ann. VII(6) of 3 December 1947 (UNESCO 2 C/Resolutions at 55); 7 EX/17 (1948); EX/CP/SC.1/3 (1948); 3 C/Res. XI Ann.V (I and II) of 6 December 1948 (UNESCO 3 C/Resolutions at 63); and 4 C/Res. 35 to 35.39 of 4 October 1949 (UNESCO 4 C/Resolutions at 75).Google Scholar
  79. 77.
    See e.g. UNESCO Docs. 10 EX/SR.2 (prov.) pp. 6–7; and 11 EX/SR.3 rev. (1948) pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  80. 78.
    As note 76 above.Google Scholar
  81. 79.

Copyright information

© Clare Wells 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clare Wells

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations