Skip to main content

The UNCTAD Secretariat after Two Decades of Groups

  • Chapter
Multilateral Development Diplomacy in Unctad

Abstract

This chapter isolates the impact of the group system of negotiations on the UNCTAD secretariat’s activities, on its ability to act and to produce results. We discuss only the international secretariat of UNCTAD, not its member governments. Observers have argued, although not effectively, that the failure of multilateral negotiations, and UNCTAD more generally, can be directly attributed to the lack of any desire by elites in these governments to effect change-those from the North because they wish to prevent change in general and protect their own standing in the international hierarchy, and those from the South whose privileged status within their own societies would be challenged by any significant success in constructing a NIEO.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 5

  1. see: Karl P. Sauvant, The Group of 77 ( New York, Oceana Publications, 1981 ), pp. 27–99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gamani Corea, Need for Change: Towards the New International Economic Order ( Oxford, Pergamon, 1980 ), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charles A. Jones, The North-South Dialogue: A Brief History ( London, Pinter, 1983 ), p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a discussion of this historical development, see: Thomas G. Weiss, International Bureaucracy ( Lexington, Mass., Heath, 1975 ), pp. 33–86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. S. Walters, ‘International Organizations and Political Communications: The Use of UNCTAD by Less Developed Countries’, International Organization, vol. XXV, no. 4, Autumn 1971, p. 821.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joseph S. Nye, ‘UNCTAD: Poor Nations’ Pressure Group’, in Robert W. Cox and Harold K. Jacobson (eds), The Anatomy of Influence: Decision-Making in International Organizations (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1973) pp. 334–70;

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a good discussion of this period, see: Branislav Gosovic, UNCTAD: Compromise and Conflict (Leiden, Sijthoff, 1972), pp. 198–217 and pp. 304–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See: P. T. Bauer, Dissent on Development ( London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See: Johan Galtung, ‘Power and Global Planning and Resource Management’ in Anthony J. Dolman (ed.), Global Planning and Resource Management: Toward International Decision Making in a Divided World ( Oxford, Pergamon, 1980 ), pp. 119–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert L. Rothstein, ‘Is the North—South Dialogue Worth Saving?’ Third World Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 4, January 1984, p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Thomas G. Weiss

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiss, T.G. (1986). The UNCTAD Secretariat after Two Decades of Groups. In: Multilateral Development Diplomacy in Unctad. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08149-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics