Skip to main content

The Free Market Argument

  • Chapter
Free Market Economics
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

It is important to point out at the beginning that what I call the “free market argument” differs from what has come to be known as the “conservative argument.” This is because the latter is a composite of moral, economic, and political arguments that present a multi-faceted perspective on social issues. George Nash in The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945 divides conservatives into three groups—the “libertarians” or classical liberals, the “traditionalists,” and the “evangelical anti-communists.” He claims that a full characterization of the conservative argument must take all of these groups into account. My characterization of the free market argument is closest to the libertarian view, concentrating on the classical liberal value of individual rights and avoiding the emotional and moralistic concerns of the “traditionalists” and “evangelical anti-communists.” I will separate the free market argument from the conservative argument and investigate it in isolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Howard Margolis, Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality: A Theory of Social Choice, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See William F. Baxter, People or Penguins: The Case for Optimal Pollution, New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See James Buchanan, “A Contractarian Paradise for Applying Economic Theory,” American Economic Review, 65 (2), May 1975, pp. 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948. For a view similar to Hayek’s, see Andrew Schotter, The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. A. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Locke, Two Essays on Government, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1960, pp. 418–419.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeremy Bentham, Principles of Morals and Legislation Oxford: Wilfred Harrison, 1948, Chapter 3, Section i.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Kaldor, “Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Economic Journal, 49, 1939, pp. 549–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. See William Baumol, Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State, London: Longmans Green, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Gerard Debreu, The Theory of Value, New York: Wiley, 1959; and Kenneth Arrow and Frank Hahn, General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco: Holden Day, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 St. Martin’s Press, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schotter, A. (1985). The Free Market Argument. In: Free Market Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08128-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics