Abstract
It is important to point out at the beginning that what I call the “free market argument” differs from what has come to be known as the “conservative argument.” This is because the latter is a composite of moral, economic, and political arguments that present a multi-faceted perspective on social issues. George Nash in The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945 divides conservatives into three groups—the “libertarians” or classical liberals, the “traditionalists,” and the “evangelical anti-communists.” He claims that a full characterization of the conservative argument must take all of these groups into account. My characterization of the free market argument is closest to the libertarian view, concentrating on the classical liberal value of individual rights and avoiding the emotional and moralistic concerns of the “traditionalists” and “evangelical anti-communists.” I will separate the free market argument from the conservative argument and investigate it in isolation.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1981.
See Howard Margolis, Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality: A Theory of Social Choice, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
See William F. Baxter, People or Penguins: The Case for Optimal Pollution, New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.
See James Buchanan, “A Contractarian Paradise for Applying Economic Theory,” American Economic Review, 65 (2), May 1975, pp. 225–231.
Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books, 1976.
See John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
F. A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948. For a view similar to Hayek’s, see Andrew Schotter, The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
F. A. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
John Locke, Two Essays on Government, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1960, pp. 418–419.
Jeremy Bentham, Principles of Morals and Legislation Oxford: Wilfred Harrison, 1948, Chapter 3, Section i.
N. Kaldor, “Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Economic Journal, 49, 1939, pp. 549–552.
See William Baumol, Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State, London: Longmans Green, 1952.
Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.
See Gerard Debreu, The Theory of Value, New York: Wiley, 1959; and Kenneth Arrow and Frank Hahn, General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco: Holden Day, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1985 St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schotter, A. (1985). The Free Market Argument. In: Free Market Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08128-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08128-8_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08130-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08128-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)