Relevance of Tool Life Testing for Tool Replacement Strategies

  • U. La Commare
  • G. Passannanti


Several analytical and simulation models have been proposed in order to select the optimal tool replacement strategies both in single and multi-tool machining operations. All of these models, however, assume as known the probability density function that describes the stochastic behaviour of tool life. The costly efforts required in order to achieve an accurate estimate of the p.d.f. limits the use in the shop practice of the above models.

The aim of the present paper is to set up a methodology for the determination of the number of tests that it is necessary to carry out in order to obtain a suitable estimate of the p.d.f. and of its parameters. An interesting result is that the number of tool life tests is relatively low and this should induce towards the implementation in shop practice of optimal tool replacement strategies.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. /1/.
    E. DOYLE (1973) Optimum Cutting Speed and Tool Replacement Policy with Variable Tool Life, SME Manufacturing Engineering Transactions, p. 1Google Scholar
  2. /2/.
    S. RAMALINGAM, N. BALASUBRAMANIAN and Y. PENG (1977) Tool Life Scatter, Tooling Cost and Replacement Schedules, Manufacturing Engineering Transactions, Proc. 5th NAMR Conf., p. 212Google Scholar
  3. /3/.
    G.L.RAVIGNANI, A. ZOMPI’ and R. LEVI (1978) Multi-Tool Machining Analysis. Part 2 Economic Evaluation in View of Tool Life Scatter, ASME paper No. 78-WA/PROD-25Google Scholar
  4. /4/.
    A.K. SHEIKH, L.A. KENDALL and S.M. PANDIT (1980) Probabilistic Optimization of Multi-tool Machining Operations, ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 102, p. 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. /5/.
    U. LA COMMARE, S. NOTO LA DIEGA and A. PASSANNANTI (1983) Optimum Tool Replacement Policies with Penalty Costs for Unforeseen Tool Failures, Int. Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research 23, p. 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. /6/.
    U. LA COMMARE, S. NOTO LA DIEGA and A. PASSANNANTI (1984) A Stochastic Approach to Optimum Tool Replacement Strategies in Multi-Tool Machining, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  7. /7/.
    U. LA COMMARE, S. NOTO LA DIEGA and A. PASSANNANTI (1986) Tool Replacement Strategies by Computer Simulation, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Production Control in the Metalworking IndustryGoogle Scholar
  8. /8/.
    C.P. QUESENBERRY and J. KENT (1982) Selecting among Probability Distributions used in Reliability, Technometrics 24, p. 59MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. /9/.
    J.G. WAGER and M.M. BARASH (1971) Study of the Distribution of the Life of HSS Tools, ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 93, p. 1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. /10/.
    L.A. KENDALL and A.K. SHEIKH (1979) Coefficient of Variation: An Index of Tool Reliability and its Significance in Automated Production, Proc. 7th NAMR Conf., p. 362Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. La Commare
    • 1
  • G. Passannanti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Technology and Production EngineeringUniversity of PalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations