Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper reports on a study into comparisons of different methods of tool wear assessment in turning. There is still a great deal of controversy about the usefulness and sensitivity of the different types of device which are commercially available.

The work reported here describes the possible methods of measuring wear for in-process applications, and defines those which have been commercialised. It then goes on to discuss the sensitivity of the useful methods and tabulates them for increasing sensitivity. This is based upon logical argument and the experience of other researchers. The paper then describes actual testing carried out by one of the authors and gives results for vibration, tool force and power sensing of wear.

The results of the tests supported the sensitivity tabulation already noted which places power, vibration and tool force sensing in an ascending order of sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. PROJECT DEFINITION STUDY(1985) Sensor Based Machine Tool Management System, Dept. of Engineering, University of Warwick, and Dept. of Mechanical & Manufacturing Systems Engineering, UWIST Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  2. N.H. COOK(1980) Tool Wear Sensors, Wear 62, p.49–57

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.F. MICHELETTI, W. KOENIG and H.R. VICTOR(1976) In-Process Tool Wear Sensors for Cutting Operations, Annals of the CIRP Vol 25/2, p.483–496

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. SPUR and F. LEONARDS (1973) Sensoren zur Erfassung von Prozesskenngrossen bei der Krehbearbeitung, Annals of the CIRP Vol 24/1

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. ESSEL and W. HANSEL(1975) Development of Sensors for Process Control Systems in the Field of Production Engineering, PDV-Rep KFK-PDV 41, Gesellschaft fur Kernforschung mbH, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.M. ARSORSKI (1983) Wear Sensors in the adaptive control of machine tools, Int. J. Prod. Research V21 n 3, p.347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.J. WILKINSON (1971) Constriction-Resistance Concept Applied to Wear Measurement of Metal Cutting Tools, Proc.IEE Vol 118, n 2

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. SAKAI, N. YODA and K. OGURA(1974) Research on Tool Wear Sensing, JSMR No 740–15, p.209–212

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. UEHARA(1973) New Attempts for Short Time Tool Life Testing, Annals of the CIRP 22(1)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. NOVAK(1983) Monitoring of the Tool Conditions by Means of Photodiode Arrays, Manuf. Systems Vol 12 n 3, p.245–255

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. ESSEL, F. OTTO and W. KIRCHNER(1974) Sensor zum Erfassen des Frei-flachenverschleises an Drehwerkzeugen, VDI-Z 116 n 17, p.1427–29

    Google Scholar 

  12. N.F. SHILLMAN(1971) The On-line Control of Cutting Conditions Using Direct Feedback, Proc.12th Int.MTDR Conference

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. SOLAJA and VUKELJA (1973) Identification of Tool Wear Rate by Temperature Variation of a Carbide Tip, Annals of the CIRP 22, 1 p.117–119

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.F. MICHELETTI (1966) Relationship Between Cutting Forces and Tool Wear in Steel Turning, 7th Int.MTDR Conference Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. TARAMAN, R. SWANDO and W. YAMAUCHI (1974) Relationship Between Tool Forces and Flank Wear, SME Tech Paper No MR74, p.704

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. TLUSTY and G.C. ANDREWS (1983) A Critical Review of Sensors for Unmanned Machining, Annals of CIRP Vol 32 n 2, p.563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. SCHAFFER(1983) Sensors: the Eyes and Ears of CIM, Am Mach. Vol 127 n 7, p.109–124

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. TAKEYAMA(1975) Automation Developments in Japan, 3rd North American Metalworking Research Conference, p.672–85

    Google Scholar 

  19. L.V. COLWELL, J.C. MAZUR and J. ANGELL(1975) Progress REport, Diagnostic Sensing in Machining Operations, Project 320357, University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  20. W.K. AACHEN(1984) In-process Monitoring of Cutting Tool Forces, 2nd Biennial Intl. Mach. Tool Tech. Conference V11, p.83–99

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. MARTIN, B. MUTELS and J.P. DRAPIER(1974) Influence of Lathe Tool Wear on the Vibrations Sustained in Cutting, Proc. of the 15th MTDR Conf, p.251–257

    Google Scholar 

  22. T.H. HINGLE and J.H. RAKELS(1983) The Practical Application of Diffraction Techniques to Assess Surface Finnish of Diamond Turned Parts, Annals of CIRP Vol 32 n 1, p.499–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. UENO (1972) In Process Measurement in Europe and US, JSPE No 10, p.803–807

    Google Scholar 

  24. G.F. KINDL (1983) Automatic In-Process Gauging with Laser Optics, Conf. Proc.20th Ann. Meeting Num. Control Soc, p.135–137

    Google Scholar 

  25. E.J. WELLER, H.M. SCHRIER and B. WELCHBRODT(1969) What Sound can be expected from a Worn Tool?, Trans ASME J Eng. Ind Vol 91 n 3, p.525–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Y. MORIWAKI(1980) Detecting for Cutting Tool Fracture by Acoustic Emission Measurement, Annals of CIRP Vol 29 n 1 p.35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. SANDVIK AB Sandviken, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. WERNER, TI Rockwell Ltd, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  29. CINCINNATI MILACRON (UK) LTD, Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  30. MACOTECH CORPORATION, Seattle, Wa, USA

    Google Scholar 

  31. VALENITE MODCO (UK) LTD, Milton Keynes, UK

    Google Scholar 

  32. OSAKA KIKO CO, Osaka, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. GEE et A1 (1984) Automatic Detection of Cutting Tool Failure, 2nd Biennial Int. Machine Tool Tech Conf, p.4–129 to 4–143

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.W. POWELL et al (1984) Cutting Tool Sensors, 2nd Biennial Int. Machine Tool Tech Conf, p.4–145 to 4–161

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. OWEN(1985) An Investigation into Techniques suitable for the Detection of In-Process Cutting Tool Wear of a Lathe Tool, M. Eng Project, Department of Mechanical & Manufacturing Systems Engineering, UWIST, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1986 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, K.F., Brandon, J.A., Grosvenor, R.I., Owen, A. (1986). A Comparison of in-Process Tool Wear Measurement Methods in Turning. In: Davies, B.J. (eds) Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08114-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08114-1_37

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08116-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08114-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics