Skip to main content

Earth Station Antennas

  • Chapter
Satellites International
  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

A satellite communication system integrates a satellite and an earth station. Technically, it is analogous to a terrestrial microwave relay system. Both systems send signals from a transmitting site to a relay station in the middle, where the signals are then amplified and relayed to a remote receiving site. The main feature of the satellite system is that the terrestrial repeater in the middle is replaced by a satellite in space which circles around the Earth at varying altitudes from more than several hundred kilometres to several tens of thousands of kilometres above the ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. While the ITU is mainly concerned with maintaining the efficiency of satellite communications, both the United Nations and UNESCO are involved to a certain extent with the content of the information that is carried by communication satellites. (The UN is also involved in issues dealing with the placement of objects in space.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Portions of this chapter are an adaptation of the authors contribution to Donna A. Demac, George A. Codding Jr, Heather E. Hudson and Ram S. Jakhu, Equity in Orbit: The 1985 Space WARC, International Institute of Communications (IIC), London, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See International Telecommunication Convention, Nairobi, 1982, ITU, Geneva, 1983, Annex 2, paragraph 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See George A. Codding Jr and Anthony M. Rutkowski, The International Telecommunication Union in a Changing World, Artech House, Dedham, MA, 1982, Chapter One. For additional information on the older history of the ITU see the authors International Telecommunication Union, E.J. Brill, Leiden, 1952 (reprinted in 1972 by Arno Press).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The only exception to the simple majority vote involves the admittance of new members to the ITU. If the applicant is not already a member of the United Nations it must receive the approval of two-thirds of the ITUs membership.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For the details of the ITUs structure, see the International Telecommunication Convention, Nairobi, 1982, Articles 5 through 12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., Article 7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., Article 8, 4. (4).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., Article 9, 1. (3).

    Google Scholar 

  10. In 1984, the IFRB had 137 in its secretariat, the CCITT 43, and the CCIR 26. See ITU, Report on the activities of the International Telecommunication Union in 1984, Geneva, 1985, p.125.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The work of the ITU is financed mainly by contributions from the member countries. The amount that each member contributes depends on the contributory class that it chooses, ranging from a high of 40 units down to a minimum of 1/8 unit.

    Google Scholar 

  12. As quoted in Codding The International Telecommunication Union, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Radio Regulations, Edition of 1982, ITU, Geneva, 1982, Article 12, paragraph 1, (1) c.

    Google Scholar 

  15. In the case of an unfavourable finding, there are a number of provisional and appellate procedures which could result in an eventual entry of that notification in the Master Register with full or secondary rights.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Codding and Rutkowski, pp. 262265.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The first plan, the Geneva Plan, allotted frequencies to European broadcasting stations on the basis of: 1) existing services; 2) size of country; 3) population density; and 4) economic development. See Codding and Rutkowski, pp. 26768.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Other regions followed the lead of the Europeans and allotment plans were created for a number of additional terrestrial radio services, including both aeronautical and maritime mobile, but an attempt to do the same for all other frequencies that make them likely to cause international harmful interference was unsuccessful. Such a plan was suggested by the United States at the ITUs first post-war conference held in Atlantic City in 1947, but for a number of reasons, inlcuding international politics, it did not become a reality. See Codding and Rutkowski, pp. 3135.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Radio Regulations, ITU, Geneva, 1959, Article 5 and Recommendation No. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See E.D. Ducharme, R.R. Bowen and M.J.R Irwin, The Genesis of the 1985/1987 ITU World Administrative Radio Conference on the Use of the Geostationary Satellite Orbit and the Planning of Space Services Utilizing It, in Annals of Space Law, Volume VII, 1982, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  21. As quoted in Milton S. Smith III, Space WARC 1985 Legal Issues and Implications, LL.M. thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research at the Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The official title being the World Administrative Radio Conference for Space Communications, Geneva, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For details of the procedure, see Radio Regulations, Edition of 1982, Articles 11 and 13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Final Acts of the World Administrative Radio Conference for Space Communications, ITU, Geneva, 1971, Resolution Spa 2–1 and Recommendation Spa 2–1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Radio Regulations, Edition of 1982, Article 30, Section II.

    Google Scholar 

  26. DuCharme, Bowen and Irwin, p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  27. International Telecommunication Convention, Nairobi, 1982, ITU, Geneva, 1982, Article 33 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Anthony M. Rutkowskis account of the discussions in Six Ad-Hoc Two: The Third World Speaks its Mind, in Satellite Communications, Volume 4, March 1981, p.23.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Radio Regulations, Edition of 1982, Resolution No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  30. For frequency management purposes, the ITU divides the world into three regions: Region 1 includes Europe, Africa and the USSR; Region 2, the Western hemisphere; and Region 3, Asia and Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Final Acts of the World Administrative Radio Conference for the Planning of the Broadcasting Satellite Service in Frequency Bands 11.7 to 12.2 GHz (in Regions 2 and 3) and 11.7 to 12.5 (in Region 1), ITU, Geneva, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Milton S. Smith III, pp. 12829.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Report of the United States Delegation to the ITU Region 2 Administrative Radio Conference on the Broadcasting Satellite Service, Geneva, Switzerland, 13 June to 17 July 1983, US Department of State, Washington, DC, 1983, p. 2 (mimeo). Nevertheless, the US did make reservations to the plan concerning polarization in its downlink and feeder-link channel assignment and the coverage area power flux density, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Radio Regulations, Edition of 1982, Resolution No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See Report of the CCIR Conference Preparatory Meeting (CPM) for the WARC ORB (1) Joint Meeting, Study Groups 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Geneva, 25 June to 20 July 1984, Part III, ITU, CCIR, Administrative Supplement, Document B/180-F/E/S, 19 July 1984, pp. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  37. The ITU has used various acronyms for this conference including ORB WARC (1), WARC-ORB (1), or WARC ORB-85. In this discussion we will use the term 1985 Space WARC.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See World Administrative Radio Conference on the Use of the Geostationary-Satellite Orbit and the Planning of Space Services Utilizing It, First Session, Geneva, 1985, Final Acts, WARC ORB-85, ITU, Geneva, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See, for instance, Third Notice of Inquiry [in General Document No. 80741], US Federal Communication Commission, FCC 83452 (adopted 6 October 1983), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See 1985 Space WARC Document 18-E (13 June 1985), Document 30-E (27 June 1985) and Document 31-E (1 July 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  41. It should be noted that a quorum was not present when the conference accepted the provisions setting the duration of the plan at ten years, requiring existing systems to make adjustments to accommodate new systems, and describing the meaning of the principle of guarantee of access. See Addendum to Report to the Second Session of the Conference, Document 324 (Rev. 1), 15 September 1985 and Corrigendum 1.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See Report to the Second Session of the Conference. For an account of the accomplishments of the 1985 Space WARC, see R.E. Butler, Opening Statement, a speech delivered at the Annenberg School Program, 25 October 1985 and D. Withers, Equitable Access to Satellite Communication, in Electronics and Wireless World, December 1985, pp. 65, 66, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  44. The US delegation made a declaration to the effect that the US did not feel it was appropriate to use as much space for the allotment plan as was proposed. Nevertheless, after the conference the head of the US delegation was willing to say that under the circumstances the US came out of the conference very well. See Briefing by Dean Burch, US Representative to the World Administrative Radio Conference (WARC) on Space Communications at the State Department, a mimeograph distributed at the Second Circle Congressional Study Group, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, 4 October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nosaka, K., Yamada, M. (1987). Earth Station Antennas. In: Satellites International. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08103-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08103-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08105-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08103-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics