Abstract
In writing this chapter I have been moved by the charisma of two men. No one who has come under the spell of Professor Lucas Beltrán can wonder at my joy in being asked to write in his honour. In choosing Richard Cantillon as my subject, I look back to the man who first perceived the need and possibility of our discipline as a distinct, coherent whole, and who saw its theme as the history-making operation of human nature. In years long after his, economics put on a very different mask. It saw itself as the science of a calculable, determinate world, and later still as a manipulable world. In this vision of itself, its Narcissism has denied the nature of man. At the end of the nineteenth century, only a very few, such as Philip Wicksteed, saw business as essentially conditioned by uncertainty, a lesson so long since taught by Cantillon.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Coddington, Varieties of Keynesianism. Thames Papers in Political Economy, Spring 1976 (London: Thames Polytechnic).
J. R. Hicks, ‘A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money’ Economica new series, vol. 2, no. 5, February 1935, pp. 1–19.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1988 G. L. S. Shackle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frowen, S.F. (1988). Cantillon Far Ahead of his Time. In: Frowen, S.F. (eds) Business, Time and Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08100-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08100-4_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08102-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08100-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)