Skip to main content

Moral Responsibility and Agricultural Research (1)

  • Chapter
Agriculture and International Relations
  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

The productivity of modern agriculture is the result of a remarkable fusion of technology and science (White, 1968; Asimov, 1979). In the West this fusion was built on ideological foundations that, from the early Middle Ages, has valued both the improvement of material well being and the advancement of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asimov, I, (1979), ‘Pure and Impure: The Interplay of Science and Technology’, Saturday Review, Vol. 6, 9 June, pp. 22–24 and 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazelon, D. L. (1979), ‘Risk and Responsibility’, Science, Vol. 205, 20 July, pp. 277–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1977), The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture (San Francisco: Sierra Club Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kruif, P. (1928), Hunger Fighters (New York: Harcourt Brace).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberstad, N. (1980), ‘Malthusians, Marxists and Missionaries’, Society, Vol. 17, September/ October, pp. 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florman, S. C. (1976), The Existential Pleasure of Engineering (New York: St. Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, W. H. and A. E. Barton (1975), Destalking the Wily Tomato: a Case Study in Social Consequences in California (Davis: Department of Applied Behavioral Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (1977), How the Other Half Dies: the Real Reasons for World Hunger (Montclair: Allanheld Osman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, C. M. (1976), Freedom in Agricultural Education (New York: Arno Press), reprinted from the 1955 edition published by the University of Chicago Press, pp. 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, C. M., (1979), ‘Feeding the World: Conflicting Views on Policy’, Agricultural History. Vol. 53, October, pp. 787–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hightower, J. (1973), Hard Tomatoes, Hard Times (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. L. and J. L. Brown (1980), ‘An Evaluation of the Normative and Prescriptive Content of the Department of Energy Mid-term Energy Forecasting System and the Texas National Energy Modeling Project’, in: M. C. Holloway (ed.), Texas National Energy Modeling Project. Part III (Austin, Texas: Texas Energy and Natural Resources Advisory Council, 1980), pp. 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, R. E., A. Schmitz and D. Zilberman (1979), ‘Technological Change in Agriculture’, Science, Vol. 206, October, pp. 1277–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappé, R. M. and J. Collins, with G. Fowler (1977), Food First: Beyond the Myth of Scarcity (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. (1980), ‘Bergland Opposed on Farm Machinery Policy’, Science, Vol. 208, 9 May, pp. 578–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, H. (1979), ‘The Ethics of Science’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 4, March, pp. 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V. W. (1982a), ‘Agricultural Scientists as Reluctant Revolutionaries’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 7, September, pp. 170–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V. W. (1982b), Agricultural Research Policy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 331–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, W. D. (1968), ‘Advances in American Agriculture: the Mechanical Tomato Harvester as a Case Study’, Technology and Culture, October, pp. 531–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, A. and D. Seckler (1970), ‘Mechanised Agriculture and Social Welfare: the Case of the Tomato Harvester’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 52, November, pp. 569–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. (1974), ‘Faith, Utility and the Legitimacy Science’, Daedalus, Vol. 103, Summer, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (1980), ‘Letter’, June 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stakman, E. C., R. Bradfield and P. C. Mangelsdorf (1968), Campaigns Against Hunger (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, C. and C. Whipple (1980), ‘Risk of Risk Decision’, Science, Vol. 208, 6 June, pp. 1114–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, P. 0. (1969), ‘The Public Sector and the Public Interest’, in: R. H. Havemann (ed.), The Analyses and Evaluation Expenditures: the PPB System, edited for the Subcommittee on Economy in Government, Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (Washington: US Government Printing Office), pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Public Health Service (1980), Smoking and Health, a Report of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, DHEW Publication Number (PHS) 79–500066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valliantos, E. G. (1977), Fear in the Countryside: the Control of Agricultural Resources in Poor Countries (Cambridge: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. Jr. (1968), Machina Ex Deo: Essays in the Dynamism of Western Culture (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1985 Hartwig de Haen and Stefan Tangermann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruttan, V.W. (1985). Moral Responsibility and Agricultural Research (1). In: de Haen, H., Johnson, G.L., Tangermann, S. (eds) Agriculture and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07981-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics