Skip to main content
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is written for the benefit of project managers and engineers who might have the responsibility for the design and implementation of an FMS. It is not intended to provide all the necessary theory on how a full financial appraisal should be carried out, but more to ensure that if such an analysis is required, and is approached as suggested, it will prove to be both comprehensive and acceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • L. Weaver, ‘Investing in advanced manufacturing technology’, Production Engineer, October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Primrose, J. Hoey and R. Leonard, ‘A methodology for incorporating the company wide benefits of material requirements planning within a discounted cash flow analysis’, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.y Vol. 199, No. B4, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. A. Tipnis and A. C. Misal, ‘Economics of flexible manufacturing systems’, SME FMS 1985 Conference (MS85–154), March 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Sloggy, ‘How to justify the cost of an FMS’, Tooling and Production, December 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Shewchuk, ‘Justifying flexible automation’, American Machinist, October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Primrose and R. Leonard, ‘The use of a conceptual model to evaluate financially flexible manufacturing system projects’, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Vol. 199, No. Bl, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Adopt automation — but with some consideration’, Production Engineer (NP 40), May 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘How to justify installing FMS’, Production Engineer, April 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Adding up the real costs of factory automation’, Engineer, April 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. T. Klahorst, ‘How to justify multi-machine systems’, American Machinist, September 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Mills, ‘More effective use of NPV in investment appraisal’, Management Accounting, February 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. L. Inman, ‘Overhead absorption variance analysis — compounding the problem’, Management Accounting, September 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Elphick, ‘Cost allocation: a new approach’, Management Accounting, December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Primrose and R. Leonard, ‘Conditions under which flexible manufacturing is financially viable’, 3rd Int. FMS Conf, September 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Williams, ‘Understanding “just in time” manufacturing’, Production Engineer, July/August 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Jelink and J. D. Goldhar, ‘Economics in the factory of the future’, CIM Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Browne, ‘Understanding CIM and making it work’, Production Engineer, December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Palframan, ‘A glimpse of the CIM future’, New Technology, May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. W. Nicols, ‘Understanding the impact of CIM’, Chartered Mechanical Engineer, May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. B. Davis, ‘Renaissance on the factory floor’, High Technology, May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Nigel R. Greenwood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenwood, N.R. (1988). Financial Justification. In: Implementing Flexible Manufacturing Systems. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07959-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07959-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07961-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07959-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics