Skip to main content

Uranium, Plutonium and Decommissioning

  • Chapter
Sizewell B

Abstract

The nuclear fuel cycle is conventionally used to describe the life history of uranium fuel from mining to refining and enrichment, to fuel fabrication, fission, reprocessing and eventual disposal. We concentrate here on only four related areas, namely uranium mining, reprocessing and the alleged linkage between civil nuclear fuel use and its deployment or diversion into military weapons, the transportation of irradiated fuel, and the decommis-sioning of spent reactors. Figure 8.1 illustrates how these topics connect to the nuclear fuel cycle. The nature of the topics discussed in this chapter is significant. They raise profound moral and political issues. The Inquiry broke new grounds by dealing with such issues and the objecting groups undoubtedly used the Inquiry as a political forum. They also exploited the investigatory nature of the Inquiry to extract information and concessions from the Board. The pattern of evidence is illustrated in Figure 8.2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnott, D. (1984) Letter to The Guardian, 20 August, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnham, K. U. J., Hart, D., Nelson, J. and Stevens, R. A. (1985) ‘Production and Destination of British Civil Plutonium’, Nature, vol. 317, pp. 213–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. D., Cardile, F., Mattsen, C., Moore, E., Hale, V., Murphy, E. E. and Kiel, G. (1981) Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Decommissioning of Nuclear facilities; NUREG 0586 ( US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton Taylor, R. (1986) ‘America May Use British Plutonium for Weapons’, Guardian, 4 June, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. (1978) The Windscale Inquiry ( HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. (1984) Cost Benefit Analysis. 2nd edn. ( Macmillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1976) Nuclear Power and the Environment, Cmnd 6618 ( HMSO, London )

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1984) Tackling Pollution—Experience and Prospects, Cmnd 9149 ( HMSO, London ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rufford, N. (1986) ‘Get Out of That’, Guardian, 12 December, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott, M. and Taylor, P. (1980) The Nuclear Controversy: A Guide to the Issues of the Windscale Inquiry ( Town and Country Planning Association, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Town and Country Planning Association (1978) Planning and Plutonium (TCPA,London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Timothy O’Riordan, Ray Kemp and Michael Purdue

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Riordan, T., Kemp, R., Purdue, M. (1988). Uranium, Plutonium and Decommissioning. In: Sizewell B. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07904-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics