The Foundations of Growth Theory

  • Jerzy Osiatyński

Abstract

The doctrine of the faster rate of growth of Department I (producing means of production) than of Department II (producing means of consumption), had its origins at the end of the nineteenth century in the debates around the Marxian schemes of reproduction, and the conditions derived from them for balanced expanded reproduction. In these discussions an important role was played by Rosa Luxemburg, with her critique of Bulgakov, Tugan-Baranovski and Lenin, who thought that the faster growth of Department I was a feature only of capitalism, and of Kautsky, who considered that in the long run it was impossible. Rosa Luxemburg argued that the faster growth rate of Department I was a general economic law, operating in all expanding socio-economic formations. Furthermore, she stated that in the socialist economy, the gap between the growth rate of Department I and that of Department II must be even greater than under capitalism. For many years after this assertion provided an unquestioned theoretical justification of the policy of forced industrialisation in the Soviet Union.

Keywords

Entropy Economic Crisis Income Omic Univer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    This appeared in O. Lange (ed.), Zagadnienia ekonomii politycznej socjalizmu (Problems of the Political Economy of Socialism) (Warsaw: Ksiąz ka i Wiedza, 1958) A later version of this appears in M. Kalecki, Dzieła, vol. III, pp. 171–84 and in English in M. Kalecki Selected Essays on Economic Planning.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    O. Lange, Theory of Reproduction and Accumulation (Oxford/Warsaw, 1977).Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Fel’dman’s model is described in E. Domar, ‘A Soviet Model of Growth’, in Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth (Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    R. F. Harrod, The Trade Cycle (Oxford, 1936);Google Scholar
  5. E. Domar, ‘Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth and Employment’, Econometrica (1946), no. 1.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    M. Kalecki, ‘A Theory of the Business Cycle’ Review of Economic Studies, London 1936–1937 vol. iv No. 2 pp 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. A Bródy Proportions, Prices and Planning: A Mathematical Restatement of the Labour Theory of Value (Akadémia Kiadò, Budapest, 1970).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Kalecki, ‘Three Ways to Full Employment’, in The Economics of Full Employment (Oxford University Institute of Statistics/Basil Blackwell, 1947), p. 47.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    United Nations World Economic Report 1952–1953 (1954), p. 44.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    See M. Kalecki, Selected Essays on the Economic Growth of the Socialist and the Mixed Economy (Cambridge University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    A. Zauberman, ‘A Few Remarks on Kalecki’s Theory of Growth under Socialism’, Kyklos (1966), no. 3, p. 422.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    See J. Pajestka, Zatrudnienie i inwestycje a wzrost gospodarczy (Employment, Investment and Economic Growth) (Warsaw, 1961), pp. 33–4.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    C Józefiak, ‘Problematyka wzrostu gospodarczego’ (‘Problems of Economic Growth’), in ‘Stan i zadania nauk ekonomicznych’ (‘The Condition and Tasks of Economics’), Ekonomista (1981), no. 6, p. 1144.Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    J. Pajestka, ‘Na nowym etapie postępu’ (‘At a New Stage of Progress’), Zycie Gospodarcze (1968), no. 22.Google Scholar
  15. 25.
    J Górski, ‘Teoria wzrostu gospodarki socjalistycznej’ (‘The Theory of Growth in a Socialist Economy’), Polityka (1966), no. 8.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    See, for example, Z. Rurarz, ‘Przesłanki przyspieszenia rozwoju kraju’ (‘The Conditions for Accelerating the Country’s Development’), Nowe Drogi (1972), no. 10,Google Scholar
  17. and the same author’s ‘Jeszcze pół procenta’ (Half a Percent More’), Życie Gospodarcze (1974), no. 12.Google Scholar
  18. 33.
    A. Krawczewski, ‘Błędy teorii — korekta praktyki’ (‘The Errors of Theory and the Corrections of Practice’), Życie Gospodarcze (1972) no. 49,Google Scholar
  19. and ‘Modele a historia’ (‘Models and History’), Życie Gospodarcze (1973), no. 43.Google Scholar
  20. Similar criticism of Kalecki’s theory was advanced by W. Iskra, ‘Teoria wzrostu gospodarczego w podręcznikach ekonomii’ (‘The Theory of Economic Growth in Economics Textbooks’), Nowe Drogi (1972), no. 12, pp. 88–9.Google Scholar
  21. Krawczewski was criticised by M. Nasiłowski in ‘O rzekomych blędach teorii socjalistycznej akumulacji’ (‘On Alleged Errors in the Theory of Socialist Accumulation’), Życie Gospodarcze (1973), no. 2,Google Scholar
  22. and J. Osiatyński in ‘Sprzeczności między inwestycjami a konsumpcja’ (‘The Contradictions Between Investment and Consumption’), Życie Gospodarcze (1974), no. 13Google Scholar
  23. 34.
    W. Iskra, ‘Czynniki surowcowo-energetyczne’ (‘Raw Materials and Energy Factors’), Życie Gospodarcze (1973), no. 13.Google Scholar
  24. This was criticised by C. Józefiak in ‘Czynniki surowcowe a teoria’ (‘Raw Materials Factors and Theory’), Życie Gospodarcze (1973), no. 26.Google Scholar
  25. 35.
    W. Iskra, ‘Czynnik ludzki w rozwoju gospodarczym krajów socjalistycznych’ (‘The Human Factor in the Economic Development of the Socialist Countries’) (Warsaw, 1974).Google Scholar
  26. See also M. Nasiłowski, ‘Zastosowanie formuły M Kaleckiego do analizy wzrostu gospodarczego’ (‘The Use of Kalecki’s Formula in the Analysis of Economic Growth’), Ekonomista (1975), no. 5, p. 1031.Google Scholar
  27. 36.
    K. Secomski, Elementy ekonomii politycznej (Elements of Political Economy) (Warsaw, 1972);Google Scholar
  28. ‘Nowoczesny rozwój społeczno-ekonomiczny a klasyczny model wzrostu gospodarczego’ (‘Modern Socio-Economic Development and the Classical Model of Economic Growth’), Ekonomista, (1975), no. 5;Google Scholar
  29. Polityka spokczna-ekonomiczna — Zarys teorii (Socio-Economic Policy: An Outline of Theory) (Warsaw, 1978)Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    J. Pajestka, Determinanty postępu: Czynniki i współzalez ności rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego (The Determinants of Progress: The Factors and Interrelationships of Socio-Economic Development) (Warsaw, 1975);Google Scholar
  31. and ‘Na marginesie “teorii wzrostu gospodarczego”’ (‘On the Margins of “The Theory of Economic Growth”’), Życie Gospodarcze (1976), no. 1.Google Scholar
  32. 38.
    For a criticism of this part of Pajestka’s analysis and his reply to it, see W. Herer and W. Sadowski, ‘Teoria wzrostu gospodarki socjalistycznej w obliczu nowych problemów’ (‘The Theory of Economic Growth in a Socialist Economy Faces New Problems’), Życie Gospodarcze (1976), no. 1.Google Scholar
  33. 40.
    J. Pajestka, Polski kryzys lat 1980–1981: Jak do niego doszło i co rokuje (The Polish Crisis of 1980–1981: Its Causes and Consequences) (Warsaw, 1981), p. 90.Google Scholar
  34. 41.
    C. Józefiak, ‘Uwagi o związkach między wzrostem gospodarczym i systemem funkcjonowania gospodarki socjalistycznej’ (‘Observations on the Connections between Economic Growth and the Functioning of the Socialist Economy’), duplicated typescript 1975;Google Scholar
  35. ‘Warunki pobudzania pozainwestycyjnych czynników wzrostu gospodarczego’ (‘The Conditions for Stimulating Non-investment Factors of Economic Growth’), Ekonomista (1976), no. 5;Google Scholar
  36. C. Józefiak ‘Funkcjonowanie a wzrost’ (‘Functioning and Growth’), Życie Gospodarcze (1977), no. 27.Google Scholar
  37. 42.
    C. Józefiak, ‘Opłacalność inwestycyjnych kredytów zagranicznych’ (‘The Profitability of Foreign Investment Credits’), Ekonomista (1979), no. 3.Google Scholar
  38. 43.
    C. Józefiak and J. Mujzel, Reprodukcja w gospodarce socjalistycznej (Reproduction in a Socialist Economy) (Warsaw, 1974).Google Scholar
  39. 44.
    K łaski, The Rate of Growth and the Rate of Interest in the Socialist Economy (Vienna-New York, 1972).Google Scholar
  40. ‘Les importations de capitaux et d’equipements et la croissance dans les pays socialistes’, Revue d’Études Comparatives Est-Oeust (1979), no. 4;Google Scholar
  41. ‘Uber das Wachstumstempo der Abteilung I und II’, in Sozializmus, Geschichte und Wirtschaft: Festschrift für Eduard Marz (Vienna, 1973).Google Scholar
  42. 45.
    S Gomułka, ‘Inventive Activity, Diffusion and Stages of Economic Growth’, Monographs of the Institute of Economics (Aarhus, 1971), no. 24;Google Scholar
  43. ‘Do New Factories Embody Best Practice Technology? New Evidence’, Economic Journal (1976), no. 4;Google Scholar
  44. ‘Growth and the Import of Technology: Poland 1971–1980’, Cambridge Journal of Economics (1978), no. 2.Google Scholar
  45. 46.
    J. Goldman and J. Flek, ‘Model hospodářského růstu za socialismu a kritérium efektivonostii soustavy planovitého řizeni’, Plânowné Hospodářstvi (1966), no. 3;Google Scholar
  46. ‘Economic Growth in Czechoslovakia: Experimental Application of Kalecki’s Model to Czechoslovak Statistical Data’, Economics of Planning (1966), no. 2.Google Scholar
  47. See also J. Goldman, ‘System planowania i zarządzania a wzrost gospodarczy’ (‘The System of Planning and Management and Economic Growth’), Życie Gospodarcze (1965), no. 7.Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    V. Nachtigal, ‘Modifikace základni rovnice v Kaleckého růstovém modelu socialisticke ekonomiky rozloženim koeficientu µ’, Politická Ekonomie (1966), no. 8.Google Scholar
  49. 50.
    For a criticism of Denison’s method and a defence of Kalecki’s see W. Herer and W. Sadowski, ‘Kapitałochlonność i postęp technicznoorganizacyjny’ (‘Capital-intensity and Technical and Organisational Progress’), Życie Gospodarcze (1970), no. 19Google Scholar
  50. and J. Osiatyński, ‘Ile i dlaczego’ (‘How Much and Why’), Życie Gospodarcze (1970), no. 18Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    M. Nasiłowski, ‘Rozwinięta formuła M. Kaleckiego a idea modelu pracy’ (‘Kalecki’s Formula Expanded and the Idea of a Labour Model’), Ekonomista (1973), no. 4;Google Scholar
  52. Analiza czynników wzrostu gospodarczego PRL (An Analysis of the Factors of Economic Growth in the Polish People’s Republic) (Warsaw, 1974);Google Scholar
  53. ‘Zastosowanie formuły M Kaleckiego do analizy wzrostu gospodarczego’ (‘The Application of Kalecki’s Formula to the Analysis of Economic Development’), Ekonomista (1975), no. 5Google Scholar
  54. 52.
    J. Goldman, ‘The Rate of Investment in the Context of the Kalecki Model of Economic Growth under Socialism’, in Economic Growth and Resources, Trends and Factors, Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress of the International Economic Association, Tokyo 29 August–3 September 1977, vol. II (London, 1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jerzy Osiatyński 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerzy Osiatyński

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations