Abstract
In the late 1940s and 1950s South Africa obtained the cooperation of Britain and America in the development of her nuclear science and technology and the exploitation of her uranium resources.1 This was in exchange for a South African agreement to supply Britain and America with uranium for their nuclear weapons programmes. In an arrangement agreed with South African Prime Minister Smuts at the end of the Second World War and implemented by the Nationalist government which came to power after the 1948 general election, the wartime allies, through their jointly-owned Combined Development Agency (CDA), supplied money and expertise for the exploitation of South Africa’s uranium resources. As explained in Chapter 2, after the passage of the 1946 US Atomic Energy Act (the McMahon Act), the CDA represented the only major continuation of the wartime collaboration in nuclear development between Britain and America, who otherwise pursued their separate nuclear courses. Fallowing the war, both countries were keen to obtain as much uranium as possible. Although uranium is now recognised to be widespread in its abundance in the earth’s crust, it was considered at the time a scarce resource. (Recent official estimates of Western world uranium resources, including those of South Africa, are shown in Table 4.1.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
The first two paragraphs of this chapter are based on: Marian Radetzki, Uranium: A Strategic Source of Energy (London: Croom Helm, 1981) pp. 37, 39;
Margaret Gowing, Independence and Deterrence: Britain and Atomic Energy, 1945–1952, vol. 1, ‘Policy-making’ (London: Macmillan, 1974) pp. 146, 383, 391;
Zdenek Červenka and Barbara Rogers, The Nuclear Axis: Secret Collaboration between West Germany and South Africa (London: Julian Friedmann, 1978) pp. 110–11, 240.
Geoff Berridge, Economic Power in Anglo-South African Diplomacy: Simonstown, Sharpeville and After (London: Macmillan, 1981) pp. 52–7.
C. S. McLean and T. K. Prentice, ‘The South African Uranium Industry’, paper submitted to the First International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 1956, quoted in Červenka and Rogers, The Nuclear Axis, p. 111.
A. R. Newby-Fraser, Chain Reaction: Twenty Years of Nuclear Research and Development in South Africa (Pretoria: Atomic Energy Board, 1979) p. 65;
European Nuclear Energy Agency and International Atomic Energy Agency, Uranium Production and Short Term Demand (Paris: OECD, 1969) p. 11; US Congress, House, Committee on International Relations, Subcommittee on International Resources, Food and Energy, Resource Development in South Africa and US Policy, Hearings, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, 8 June 1976, Appendix 6, Responses by the Energy Research and Development Administration to Additional Questions submitted in Writing by Congressman Diggs (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1976) p. 297.
Manfred Stephany, ‘Influence of Stockpiles on the Market for Natural Uranium’, in: The Uranium Institute, Uranium and Nuclear Energy: 1981 (London: Butterworth, 1982) p. 107.
Robert I. Rotberg and Norma Kriger, ‘Uranium and the Nuclear Industry’, in Robert I. Rotberg, Suffer the Future: Policy Choices in Southern Africa (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980) p. 143.
The best analysis of the cartel affair can be found in: Radetzki, Uranium: A Strategic Source of Energy. See, in particular, pp. 117–22, 137. See also: Thomas L. Neff, The International Uranium Market (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1984) pp. 45, 48–52.
Aldo Cassuto, ‘Can Uranium Enrichment Enrich South Africa?’, The World Today, 26 (1970) 424; Rotberg and Kriger, ‘Uranium and the Nuclear Industry’, p. 147; Stauffer, ‘Uranium Exporters: Who They Are and How They Work’, p. 28.
Colin Legum (ed.), Africa Contemporary Record, Annual Survey and Documents, XV, 1982–3 (New York: Africana Publishing Co., 1984) p. B769.
Le Monde, 23 July 1977, cited in Richard E. Bissell, South Africa and the United States: The Erosion of an Influence Relationship (New York: Praeger, 1982) p. 115.
William M. Raiford, The European Role in Africa and US Interests, Congressional Research Service Report no. 81–202F (Washington DC: The Library of Congress, 1981) p. 71; Nuclear Engineering International, February 1979, p. 7.
Mining Annual Review 1981, p. 474; International Institute for Strategic Studies, Strategic Survey 1981–1982 (London: IISS, 1982) p. 21.
The Uranium Institute, Uranium Supply and Demand: Perspectives to 1995 (London: The Uranium Institute, 1984) p. 7; Neff, The International Uranium Market, pp. 262–5; Nuclear News, October 1984, pp. 59–60. It should be noted however that the instrument used in the 1960s and 1970s to impose the uranium embargo, namely its enrichment monopoly, is no longer available to the US government.
Nuclear Engineering International, July 1978, p. 11; Steven J. Warnecke, Uranium, Nonproliferation and Energy Security, Atlantic Paper no. 37 (Paris: Atlantic Institute for International Affairs, 1979) pp. 87–8.
Peter Pringle and James Spigelman, The Nuclear Barons (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1981) pp. 294, 526.
South Africa’s sales of uranium to Israel are also discussed in: William Epstein, The Last Chance: Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control. (New York: Macmillan, 1976) p. 156;
George Quester, The Politics of Nuclear Proliferation (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973) p. 98.
Bertrand Goldschmidt, The Atomic Complex: A Worldwide Political History of Nuclear Energy (La Grange Park, Ill.: American Nuclear Society, 1982) p. 287.
See: Ashok Kapur, International Nuclear Proliferation: Multilateral Diplomacy and Regional Aspects (London: Praeger, 1979) pp. 234, 240;
J. E. Spence, ‘The Republic of South Africa: Proliferation and the Politics of “Outward Movement”’, in Robert M. Lawrence and Joel Larus (eds), Nuclear Proliferation PHASE II (Lawrence: University of Kansas, 1974) p. 221n;
Denis Venter, ‘South Africa and the International Controversy surrounding its Nuclear Capability’, Politikon, 5 (1978) 24–5.
Mason Willrich, ‘A Workable International Nuclear Energy Regime’, The Washington Quarterly, 2 (1979) p. 29n; Venter, ‘South Africa and the International Controversy surrounding its Nuclear Capability’, p. 25;
The Uranium Institute, The Uranium Equation: The Balance of Supply and Demand 1980–1995 (London: Mining Journal Books, 1981) p. 32.
Copyright information
© 1987 J. D. L. Moore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moore, J.D.L. (1987). Uranium Mining in Southern Africa. In: South Africa and Nuclear Proliferation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07828-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07828-8_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07830-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07828-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)